LOTS and HOTS Capabilities as Assessment Instruments Made by Elementary School Teachers in Jakarta

Background: Assessment is a crucial step for determining whether or not a learning process has been successful. High-order thinking skills are a requirement for learning achievement in the twenty-first century. The goal of this project is to put quantitative evaluation instruments created by Jakarta...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Puji Hartini, Ernawati Ernawati, Hari Setiadi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
ID
Publicado: Department of Biology Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah 2021
Materias:
L
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/4aa8c13d0418437493f69f71e4b7aa14
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:4aa8c13d0418437493f69f71e4b7aa14
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:4aa8c13d0418437493f69f71e4b7aa142021-11-22T13:46:54ZLOTS and HOTS Capabilities as Assessment Instruments Made by Elementary School Teachers in Jakarta2614-154X2614-155810.22236/j.bes/525886https://doaj.org/article/4aa8c13d0418437493f69f71e4b7aa142021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journal.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/bioeduscience/article/view/5886https://doaj.org/toc/2614-154Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2614-1558Background: Assessment is a crucial step for determining whether or not a learning process has been successful. High-order thinking skills are a requirement for learning achievement in the twenty-first century. The goal of this project is to put quantitative evaluation instruments created by Jakarta elementary school teachers to the test. Methods: A mix method is used, which combines descriptive qualitative research with document analysis and quantitative research with instrument testing on reproductive system material, which is then examined using Anates. The participants in this study were eight Jakarta-based grade VI primary school teachers. Results: It demonstrates that teachers' capacity to construct evaluation instruments varies widely. Testing using Anates shows 15% of the questions compiled are valid and 85% invalid, 1 school with strong reliability and 7 other schools are less reliable. The difference shows that 42.5% are accepted and 57.5% are rejected. The level of difficulty showed that as many as 8.75% of the questions were in the very easy category, 18.75% easy, 51.25% moderate, 7.5% difficult and 13.75 very difficult. These results form the basis of the importance of the hierarchy of teacher understanding in depth, especially in relation to the preparation of HOTS-based assessment instruments because the quality of learning success is largely determined by the assessment instrument used. Conclusions: The LOTS and HOTS-based capability instruments made by the teacher at 8 East Dijakarta Elementary Schools have not been maximized and need development by these teachers.Puji HartiniErnawati ErnawatiHari SetiadiDepartment of Biology Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyaharticlelotshotsassessment instrumentsEducationLBiology (General)QH301-705.5ENIDBioeduscience, Vol 5, Iss 2, Pp 109-115 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
ID
topic lots
hots
assessment instruments
Education
L
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
spellingShingle lots
hots
assessment instruments
Education
L
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Puji Hartini
Ernawati Ernawati
Hari Setiadi
LOTS and HOTS Capabilities as Assessment Instruments Made by Elementary School Teachers in Jakarta
description Background: Assessment is a crucial step for determining whether or not a learning process has been successful. High-order thinking skills are a requirement for learning achievement in the twenty-first century. The goal of this project is to put quantitative evaluation instruments created by Jakarta elementary school teachers to the test. Methods: A mix method is used, which combines descriptive qualitative research with document analysis and quantitative research with instrument testing on reproductive system material, which is then examined using Anates. The participants in this study were eight Jakarta-based grade VI primary school teachers. Results: It demonstrates that teachers' capacity to construct evaluation instruments varies widely. Testing using Anates shows 15% of the questions compiled are valid and 85% invalid, 1 school with strong reliability and 7 other schools are less reliable. The difference shows that 42.5% are accepted and 57.5% are rejected. The level of difficulty showed that as many as 8.75% of the questions were in the very easy category, 18.75% easy, 51.25% moderate, 7.5% difficult and 13.75 very difficult. These results form the basis of the importance of the hierarchy of teacher understanding in depth, especially in relation to the preparation of HOTS-based assessment instruments because the quality of learning success is largely determined by the assessment instrument used. Conclusions: The LOTS and HOTS-based capability instruments made by the teacher at 8 East Dijakarta Elementary Schools have not been maximized and need development by these teachers.
format article
author Puji Hartini
Ernawati Ernawati
Hari Setiadi
author_facet Puji Hartini
Ernawati Ernawati
Hari Setiadi
author_sort Puji Hartini
title LOTS and HOTS Capabilities as Assessment Instruments Made by Elementary School Teachers in Jakarta
title_short LOTS and HOTS Capabilities as Assessment Instruments Made by Elementary School Teachers in Jakarta
title_full LOTS and HOTS Capabilities as Assessment Instruments Made by Elementary School Teachers in Jakarta
title_fullStr LOTS and HOTS Capabilities as Assessment Instruments Made by Elementary School Teachers in Jakarta
title_full_unstemmed LOTS and HOTS Capabilities as Assessment Instruments Made by Elementary School Teachers in Jakarta
title_sort lots and hots capabilities as assessment instruments made by elementary school teachers in jakarta
publisher Department of Biology Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/4aa8c13d0418437493f69f71e4b7aa14
work_keys_str_mv AT pujihartini lotsandhotscapabilitiesasassessmentinstrumentsmadebyelementaryschoolteachersinjakarta
AT ernawatiernawati lotsandhotscapabilitiesasassessmentinstrumentsmadebyelementaryschoolteachersinjakarta
AT harisetiadi lotsandhotscapabilitiesasassessmentinstrumentsmadebyelementaryschoolteachersinjakarta
_version_ 1718417550833876992