Futility, appropriate care, and orders not to resuscitate: Who makes decisions and how?
Ethical issues in resuscitation arose once life-prolonging interventions advanced to the point where short-term cardiac resuscitation became plausible in patients in cases where imminent death was irreversible. The authors argue that ethical dilemmas arise from disputes over continued treatment when...
Enregistré dans:
Auteurs principaux: | Christopher D. Lewis, Michael S. Ewer |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Langue: | EN |
Publié: |
South African Heart Association
2017
|
Sujets: | |
Accès en ligne: | https://doaj.org/article/4d51a8fe65374c31a145bee4b975b17e |
Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
Documents similaires
-
Comparison of Resuscitation Outcomes Between 2‐ or 3‐Stacked Defibrillation Strategies With Minimally Interrupted Chest Compression and the Single Defibrillation Strategy: A Swine Cardiac Arrest Model
par: Soyeong Kim, et autres
Publié: (2021) -
Porcelain aorta rupture after cardiopulmonary resuscitation
par: Iria Silva, et autres
Publié: (2021) -
Porcelain aorta rupture after cardiopulmonary resuscitation
par: Iria Silva, et autres
Publié: (2021) -
Catheter Interventions for Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis: Who, When and How
par: Catherine Go, et autres
Publié: (2020) -
Hyperoxia during extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory cardiac arrest is associated with severe circulatory failure and increased mortality
par: Jean Bonnemain, et autres
Publié: (2021)