Student voices in academic writing: PsychLiverpool a community for meaning making

The practice and expectations of academic communication are changing, and blogging provides a socially liberating mechanism by which to support the development of student writing and literacy. The study reported here examines the impact of an academic–student partnership in supporting the developmen...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alexandra Forsythe, Emir Demirbag, Jasmine Warren
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Association for Learning Development in Higher Education (ALDinHE) 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/56dd0214a87242e8b1f7c7f52ac7fc8b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:56dd0214a87242e8b1f7c7f52ac7fc8b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:56dd0214a87242e8b1f7c7f52ac7fc8b2021-11-29T14:02:26ZStudent voices in academic writing: PsychLiverpool a community for meaning making10.47408/jldhe.v0i16.5111759-667Xhttps://doaj.org/article/56dd0214a87242e8b1f7c7f52ac7fc8b2019-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://repl.gianfj.com/index.php/jldhe/article/view/511https://doaj.org/toc/1759-667XThe practice and expectations of academic communication are changing, and blogging provides a socially liberating mechanism by which to support the development of student writing and literacy. The study reported here examines the impact of an academic–student partnership in supporting the development of student discourse. Anonymous feedback gathered from both the contributors and readers of the student blog, PsychLiverpool was analysed using automated text analysis. The analysis identified that high levels of positive emotion were associated with PsychLiverpool. Students valued its capacity to trigger thinking and insight, and the social and networking relationships the blog offered. PsychLiverpool empowered students to expand their learning networks outside of their classroom and peer network by connecting them with like-minded students and academics.  By providing students with safe opportunities to develop their skills and networks, it fulfilled their needs for affiliation and achievement, power and reward. The particular advantage of PsychLiverpool was that in operating outside of traditional university processes of assessment and feedback, students were more motivated to write about and engage with academic language on their own terms. Alexandra ForsytheEmir DemirbagJasmine WarrenAssociation for Learning Development in Higher Education (ALDinHE)articlepeer networkingbloggingstudent voicestudent partnershipTheory and practice of educationLB5-3640ENJournal of Learning Development in Higher Education, Iss 16 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic peer networking
blogging
student voice
student partnership
Theory and practice of education
LB5-3640
spellingShingle peer networking
blogging
student voice
student partnership
Theory and practice of education
LB5-3640
Alexandra Forsythe
Emir Demirbag
Jasmine Warren
Student voices in academic writing: PsychLiverpool a community for meaning making
description The practice and expectations of academic communication are changing, and blogging provides a socially liberating mechanism by which to support the development of student writing and literacy. The study reported here examines the impact of an academic–student partnership in supporting the development of student discourse. Anonymous feedback gathered from both the contributors and readers of the student blog, PsychLiverpool was analysed using automated text analysis. The analysis identified that high levels of positive emotion were associated with PsychLiverpool. Students valued its capacity to trigger thinking and insight, and the social and networking relationships the blog offered. PsychLiverpool empowered students to expand their learning networks outside of their classroom and peer network by connecting them with like-minded students and academics.  By providing students with safe opportunities to develop their skills and networks, it fulfilled their needs for affiliation and achievement, power and reward. The particular advantage of PsychLiverpool was that in operating outside of traditional university processes of assessment and feedback, students were more motivated to write about and engage with academic language on their own terms.
format article
author Alexandra Forsythe
Emir Demirbag
Jasmine Warren
author_facet Alexandra Forsythe
Emir Demirbag
Jasmine Warren
author_sort Alexandra Forsythe
title Student voices in academic writing: PsychLiverpool a community for meaning making
title_short Student voices in academic writing: PsychLiverpool a community for meaning making
title_full Student voices in academic writing: PsychLiverpool a community for meaning making
title_fullStr Student voices in academic writing: PsychLiverpool a community for meaning making
title_full_unstemmed Student voices in academic writing: PsychLiverpool a community for meaning making
title_sort student voices in academic writing: psychliverpool a community for meaning making
publisher Association for Learning Development in Higher Education (ALDinHE)
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/56dd0214a87242e8b1f7c7f52ac7fc8b
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandraforsythe studentvoicesinacademicwritingpsychliverpoolacommunityformeaningmaking
AT emirdemirbag studentvoicesinacademicwritingpsychliverpoolacommunityformeaningmaking
AT jasminewarren studentvoicesinacademicwritingpsychliverpoolacommunityformeaningmaking
_version_ 1718407283438780416