Student voices in academic writing: PsychLiverpool a community for meaning making
The practice and expectations of academic communication are changing, and blogging provides a socially liberating mechanism by which to support the development of student writing and literacy. The study reported here examines the impact of an academic–student partnership in supporting the developmen...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Association for Learning Development in Higher Education (ALDinHE)
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/56dd0214a87242e8b1f7c7f52ac7fc8b |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:56dd0214a87242e8b1f7c7f52ac7fc8b |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:56dd0214a87242e8b1f7c7f52ac7fc8b2021-11-29T14:02:26ZStudent voices in academic writing: PsychLiverpool a community for meaning making10.47408/jldhe.v0i16.5111759-667Xhttps://doaj.org/article/56dd0214a87242e8b1f7c7f52ac7fc8b2019-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://repl.gianfj.com/index.php/jldhe/article/view/511https://doaj.org/toc/1759-667XThe practice and expectations of academic communication are changing, and blogging provides a socially liberating mechanism by which to support the development of student writing and literacy. The study reported here examines the impact of an academic–student partnership in supporting the development of student discourse. Anonymous feedback gathered from both the contributors and readers of the student blog, PsychLiverpool was analysed using automated text analysis. The analysis identified that high levels of positive emotion were associated with PsychLiverpool. Students valued its capacity to trigger thinking and insight, and the social and networking relationships the blog offered. PsychLiverpool empowered students to expand their learning networks outside of their classroom and peer network by connecting them with like-minded students and academics. By providing students with safe opportunities to develop their skills and networks, it fulfilled their needs for affiliation and achievement, power and reward. The particular advantage of PsychLiverpool was that in operating outside of traditional university processes of assessment and feedback, students were more motivated to write about and engage with academic language on their own terms. Alexandra ForsytheEmir DemirbagJasmine WarrenAssociation for Learning Development in Higher Education (ALDinHE)articlepeer networkingbloggingstudent voicestudent partnershipTheory and practice of educationLB5-3640ENJournal of Learning Development in Higher Education, Iss 16 (2019) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
peer networking blogging student voice student partnership Theory and practice of education LB5-3640 |
spellingShingle |
peer networking blogging student voice student partnership Theory and practice of education LB5-3640 Alexandra Forsythe Emir Demirbag Jasmine Warren Student voices in academic writing: PsychLiverpool a community for meaning making |
description |
The practice and expectations of academic communication are changing, and blogging provides a socially liberating mechanism by which to support the development of student writing and literacy. The study reported here examines the impact of an academic–student partnership in supporting the development of student discourse. Anonymous feedback gathered from both the contributors and readers of the student blog, PsychLiverpool was analysed using automated text analysis. The analysis identified that high levels of positive emotion were associated with PsychLiverpool. Students valued its capacity to trigger thinking and insight, and the social and networking relationships the blog offered. PsychLiverpool empowered students to expand their learning networks outside of their classroom and peer network by connecting them with like-minded students and academics. By providing students with safe opportunities to develop their skills and networks, it fulfilled their needs for affiliation and achievement, power and reward. The particular advantage of PsychLiverpool was that in operating outside of traditional university processes of assessment and feedback, students were more motivated to write about and engage with academic language on their own terms.
|
format |
article |
author |
Alexandra Forsythe Emir Demirbag Jasmine Warren |
author_facet |
Alexandra Forsythe Emir Demirbag Jasmine Warren |
author_sort |
Alexandra Forsythe |
title |
Student voices in academic writing: PsychLiverpool a community for meaning making |
title_short |
Student voices in academic writing: PsychLiverpool a community for meaning making |
title_full |
Student voices in academic writing: PsychLiverpool a community for meaning making |
title_fullStr |
Student voices in academic writing: PsychLiverpool a community for meaning making |
title_full_unstemmed |
Student voices in academic writing: PsychLiverpool a community for meaning making |
title_sort |
student voices in academic writing: psychliverpool a community for meaning making |
publisher |
Association for Learning Development in Higher Education (ALDinHE) |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/56dd0214a87242e8b1f7c7f52ac7fc8b |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alexandraforsythe studentvoicesinacademicwritingpsychliverpoolacommunityformeaningmaking AT emirdemirbag studentvoicesinacademicwritingpsychliverpoolacommunityformeaningmaking AT jasminewarren studentvoicesinacademicwritingpsychliverpoolacommunityformeaningmaking |
_version_ |
1718407283438780416 |