Analysis of Theories of Educational Jurisprudence and International Law Regarding the Cloned Child

Proponents of educational jurisprudence in Iran believe that the principles of jurisprudence can be used in various fields of educational sciences, including the process of childbirth. One of the new scientific phenomena and development is the birth of a simulated child and the explanation of behavi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fatemeh Hosseinabadi, Mohammad Gholam Alizadeh, Ali Akbar Ismaili
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Comparative Education Society of Iran ( CESIR) 2021
Materias:
L
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5c36f175ef5947e2bbc29524f60990df
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5c36f175ef5947e2bbc29524f60990df
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5c36f175ef5947e2bbc29524f60990df2021-11-14T15:55:18ZAnalysis of Theories of Educational Jurisprudence and International Law Regarding the Cloned Child2588-72702676-498910.22034/ijce.2021.269684.1276https://doaj.org/article/5c36f175ef5947e2bbc29524f60990df2021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journal.cesir.ir/article_137285_0737f8bfefb1b46744a3eaab83845202.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2588-7270https://doaj.org/toc/2676-4989Proponents of educational jurisprudence in Iran believe that the principles of jurisprudence can be used in various fields of educational sciences, including the process of childbirth. One of the new scientific phenomena and development is the birth of a simulated child and the explanation of behavioral and educational dimensions and challenges of this method of birth. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the perspectives of educational jurists and international law regarding the simulated child. The research method is a comparative qualitative using systematic review approach. The research population included all studies that were published in the period 2000-2020. Boolean strategy was used to select the research sample and systematic review method - Kitchenham & Charters approach - was used for data analysis. The first research finding reveals that there is a difference between the opinions of the two groups in eight components and similarities in five dimensions. The unpredictable consequences of human simulation, threat to the family system, attention to the rights of the simulated child, and the preference of therapeutic simulation over productive simulation form the common denominator of educational jurists with the laws of international organizations. Dimensions such as the ideological basis of human status, the origin of the right to human health, the ideological basis of human consent to participate in the simulation process or the religion of the simulated person are mainly indicative of theoretical differences between the two groups. The research findings also indicated that educational jurists in Iran are more controversial than the international community on issues such as attention to the role of parents, relationship with Mahrams or Non-mahrams, and the rights of the child simulated in terms of custody, inheritance and blood money. It seems that educational systems same as religious and legal systems, must inevitably prepare themselves for the reception of simulated children in educational settings.Fatemeh HosseinabadiMohammad Gholam AlizadehAli Akbar IsmailiComparative Education Society of Iran ( CESIR)articlehuman simulationeducational jurisprudenceinternational lawtherapeutic simulationproductive simulationEducationLENIranian Journal of Comparative Education, Vol 4, Iss 3, Pp 1367-1385 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic human simulation
educational jurisprudence
international law
therapeutic simulation
productive simulation
Education
L
spellingShingle human simulation
educational jurisprudence
international law
therapeutic simulation
productive simulation
Education
L
Fatemeh Hosseinabadi
Mohammad Gholam Alizadeh
Ali Akbar Ismaili
Analysis of Theories of Educational Jurisprudence and International Law Regarding the Cloned Child
description Proponents of educational jurisprudence in Iran believe that the principles of jurisprudence can be used in various fields of educational sciences, including the process of childbirth. One of the new scientific phenomena and development is the birth of a simulated child and the explanation of behavioral and educational dimensions and challenges of this method of birth. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the perspectives of educational jurists and international law regarding the simulated child. The research method is a comparative qualitative using systematic review approach. The research population included all studies that were published in the period 2000-2020. Boolean strategy was used to select the research sample and systematic review method - Kitchenham & Charters approach - was used for data analysis. The first research finding reveals that there is a difference between the opinions of the two groups in eight components and similarities in five dimensions. The unpredictable consequences of human simulation, threat to the family system, attention to the rights of the simulated child, and the preference of therapeutic simulation over productive simulation form the common denominator of educational jurists with the laws of international organizations. Dimensions such as the ideological basis of human status, the origin of the right to human health, the ideological basis of human consent to participate in the simulation process or the religion of the simulated person are mainly indicative of theoretical differences between the two groups. The research findings also indicated that educational jurists in Iran are more controversial than the international community on issues such as attention to the role of parents, relationship with Mahrams or Non-mahrams, and the rights of the child simulated in terms of custody, inheritance and blood money. It seems that educational systems same as religious and legal systems, must inevitably prepare themselves for the reception of simulated children in educational settings.
format article
author Fatemeh Hosseinabadi
Mohammad Gholam Alizadeh
Ali Akbar Ismaili
author_facet Fatemeh Hosseinabadi
Mohammad Gholam Alizadeh
Ali Akbar Ismaili
author_sort Fatemeh Hosseinabadi
title Analysis of Theories of Educational Jurisprudence and International Law Regarding the Cloned Child
title_short Analysis of Theories of Educational Jurisprudence and International Law Regarding the Cloned Child
title_full Analysis of Theories of Educational Jurisprudence and International Law Regarding the Cloned Child
title_fullStr Analysis of Theories of Educational Jurisprudence and International Law Regarding the Cloned Child
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Theories of Educational Jurisprudence and International Law Regarding the Cloned Child
title_sort analysis of theories of educational jurisprudence and international law regarding the cloned child
publisher Comparative Education Society of Iran ( CESIR)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/5c36f175ef5947e2bbc29524f60990df
work_keys_str_mv AT fatemehhosseinabadi analysisoftheoriesofeducationaljurisprudenceandinternationallawregardingtheclonedchild
AT mohammadgholamalizadeh analysisoftheoriesofeducationaljurisprudenceandinternationallawregardingtheclonedchild
AT aliakbarismaili analysisoftheoriesofeducationaljurisprudenceandinternationallawregardingtheclonedchild
_version_ 1718429049764708352