Effects of linseed processing method (ground versus extruded) and dietary crude protein content on performance, digestibility, ruminal fermentation pattern, and rumen protozoa population in growing lambs
Thirty-six male lambs (averaging BW = 24.4 kg) were assigned in a completely randomised design with the factorial arrangement (nine lambs per each treatment) to assess the effects of linseed processing method (ground vs. extruded) and dietary crude protein content (12% vs. 15%, DM basis) on performa...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/5dc2ea8fe3a04a538653d9b0a8303a07 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:5dc2ea8fe3a04a538653d9b0a8303a07 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:5dc2ea8fe3a04a538653d9b0a8303a072021-11-11T14:23:42ZEffects of linseed processing method (ground versus extruded) and dietary crude protein content on performance, digestibility, ruminal fermentation pattern, and rumen protozoa population in growing lambs1594-40771828-051X10.1080/1828051X.2021.1984324https://doaj.org/article/5dc2ea8fe3a04a538653d9b0a8303a072021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2021.1984324https://doaj.org/toc/1594-4077https://doaj.org/toc/1828-051XThirty-six male lambs (averaging BW = 24.4 kg) were assigned in a completely randomised design with the factorial arrangement (nine lambs per each treatment) to assess the effects of linseed processing method (ground vs. extruded) and dietary crude protein content (12% vs. 15%, DM basis) on performance, digestibility, ruminal fermentation, and protozoa population. Treatments were; (1) ground linseed with 12% CP (GLS-12CP), (2) ground linseed with 15% CP (GLS-15CP), (3) extruded linseed with 12% CP (ELS-12CP), and (4) extruded linseed with 15% CP (ELS-15CP). The study lasted 84 d, and the lambs had free access to experimental diets and water. Outcomes showed that dry matter intake, digestibility of organic matter, and crude protein were increased in lambs fed ground linseed compared to extruded linseed. Feeding extruded linseed decreased urinary allantoin concentration, total purine derivatives (PD), the ruminal proportion of propionate, and blood concentration of glucose and HDL-cholesterol compared to ground linseed diets. Regarding dietary protein content, results showed that dry matter intake, urinary concentration of allantoin and total PD were increased in 15CP diets compared to 12CP diets. Considering the interaction, results showed that average daily gain was improved in GLS-15CP treatment compared to other experimental treatments. In conclusion, results show that grinding the linseed is more beneficial compared to its extrusion in lamb nutrition. Moreover, 15CP diets had a beneficial effect when fed with either ground or extruded linseed and seem to compensate, to some extent, the negative effects of extruded linseed on the gain of growing lambs.Highlights Linseed processing methods (ground vs. extruded) and dietary protein content (12 vs. 15%, DM basis) were evaluated in growing lambs Ground linseed increased average daily gain, improved digestibility, and microbial protein yield compared to extruded linseed Ground linseed was more favourable than extruded linseed and 15% CP diet has additional advantages either with the ground or extruded linseedElham AmirteymooriAmin KhezriOmid DayaniMohammadreza MohammadabadiSepideh KhorasaniAmir MousaieMehdi Kazemi-BonchenariTaylor & Francis Grouparticleoilseeds processinglinseedproteinruminal fermentationgrowing lambsAnimal cultureSF1-1100ENItalian Journal of Animal Science, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 1506-1517 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
oilseeds processing linseed protein ruminal fermentation growing lambs Animal culture SF1-1100 |
spellingShingle |
oilseeds processing linseed protein ruminal fermentation growing lambs Animal culture SF1-1100 Elham Amirteymoori Amin Khezri Omid Dayani Mohammadreza Mohammadabadi Sepideh Khorasani Amir Mousaie Mehdi Kazemi-Bonchenari Effects of linseed processing method (ground versus extruded) and dietary crude protein content on performance, digestibility, ruminal fermentation pattern, and rumen protozoa population in growing lambs |
description |
Thirty-six male lambs (averaging BW = 24.4 kg) were assigned in a completely randomised design with the factorial arrangement (nine lambs per each treatment) to assess the effects of linseed processing method (ground vs. extruded) and dietary crude protein content (12% vs. 15%, DM basis) on performance, digestibility, ruminal fermentation, and protozoa population. Treatments were; (1) ground linseed with 12% CP (GLS-12CP), (2) ground linseed with 15% CP (GLS-15CP), (3) extruded linseed with 12% CP (ELS-12CP), and (4) extruded linseed with 15% CP (ELS-15CP). The study lasted 84 d, and the lambs had free access to experimental diets and water. Outcomes showed that dry matter intake, digestibility of organic matter, and crude protein were increased in lambs fed ground linseed compared to extruded linseed. Feeding extruded linseed decreased urinary allantoin concentration, total purine derivatives (PD), the ruminal proportion of propionate, and blood concentration of glucose and HDL-cholesterol compared to ground linseed diets. Regarding dietary protein content, results showed that dry matter intake, urinary concentration of allantoin and total PD were increased in 15CP diets compared to 12CP diets. Considering the interaction, results showed that average daily gain was improved in GLS-15CP treatment compared to other experimental treatments. In conclusion, results show that grinding the linseed is more beneficial compared to its extrusion in lamb nutrition. Moreover, 15CP diets had a beneficial effect when fed with either ground or extruded linseed and seem to compensate, to some extent, the negative effects of extruded linseed on the gain of growing lambs.Highlights Linseed processing methods (ground vs. extruded) and dietary protein content (12 vs. 15%, DM basis) were evaluated in growing lambs Ground linseed increased average daily gain, improved digestibility, and microbial protein yield compared to extruded linseed Ground linseed was more favourable than extruded linseed and 15% CP diet has additional advantages either with the ground or extruded linseed |
format |
article |
author |
Elham Amirteymoori Amin Khezri Omid Dayani Mohammadreza Mohammadabadi Sepideh Khorasani Amir Mousaie Mehdi Kazemi-Bonchenari |
author_facet |
Elham Amirteymoori Amin Khezri Omid Dayani Mohammadreza Mohammadabadi Sepideh Khorasani Amir Mousaie Mehdi Kazemi-Bonchenari |
author_sort |
Elham Amirteymoori |
title |
Effects of linseed processing method (ground versus extruded) and dietary crude protein content on performance, digestibility, ruminal fermentation pattern, and rumen protozoa population in growing lambs |
title_short |
Effects of linseed processing method (ground versus extruded) and dietary crude protein content on performance, digestibility, ruminal fermentation pattern, and rumen protozoa population in growing lambs |
title_full |
Effects of linseed processing method (ground versus extruded) and dietary crude protein content on performance, digestibility, ruminal fermentation pattern, and rumen protozoa population in growing lambs |
title_fullStr |
Effects of linseed processing method (ground versus extruded) and dietary crude protein content on performance, digestibility, ruminal fermentation pattern, and rumen protozoa population in growing lambs |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effects of linseed processing method (ground versus extruded) and dietary crude protein content on performance, digestibility, ruminal fermentation pattern, and rumen protozoa population in growing lambs |
title_sort |
effects of linseed processing method (ground versus extruded) and dietary crude protein content on performance, digestibility, ruminal fermentation pattern, and rumen protozoa population in growing lambs |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/5dc2ea8fe3a04a538653d9b0a8303a07 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT elhamamirteymoori effectsoflinseedprocessingmethodgroundversusextrudedanddietarycrudeproteincontentonperformancedigestibilityruminalfermentationpatternandrumenprotozoapopulationingrowinglambs AT aminkhezri effectsoflinseedprocessingmethodgroundversusextrudedanddietarycrudeproteincontentonperformancedigestibilityruminalfermentationpatternandrumenprotozoapopulationingrowinglambs AT omiddayani effectsoflinseedprocessingmethodgroundversusextrudedanddietarycrudeproteincontentonperformancedigestibilityruminalfermentationpatternandrumenprotozoapopulationingrowinglambs AT mohammadrezamohammadabadi effectsoflinseedprocessingmethodgroundversusextrudedanddietarycrudeproteincontentonperformancedigestibilityruminalfermentationpatternandrumenprotozoapopulationingrowinglambs AT sepidehkhorasani effectsoflinseedprocessingmethodgroundversusextrudedanddietarycrudeproteincontentonperformancedigestibilityruminalfermentationpatternandrumenprotozoapopulationingrowinglambs AT amirmousaie effectsoflinseedprocessingmethodgroundversusextrudedanddietarycrudeproteincontentonperformancedigestibilityruminalfermentationpatternandrumenprotozoapopulationingrowinglambs AT mehdikazemibonchenari effectsoflinseedprocessingmethodgroundversusextrudedanddietarycrudeproteincontentonperformancedigestibilityruminalfermentationpatternandrumenprotozoapopulationingrowinglambs |
_version_ |
1718438938488602624 |