Effects of linseed processing method (ground versus extruded) and dietary crude protein content on performance, digestibility, ruminal fermentation pattern, and rumen protozoa population in growing lambs

Thirty-six male lambs (averaging BW = 24.4 kg) were assigned in a completely randomised design with the factorial arrangement (nine lambs per each treatment) to assess the effects of linseed processing method (ground vs. extruded) and dietary crude protein content (12% vs. 15%, DM basis) on performa...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elham Amirteymoori, Amin Khezri, Omid Dayani, Mohammadreza Mohammadabadi, Sepideh Khorasani, Amir Mousaie, Mehdi Kazemi-Bonchenari
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5dc2ea8fe3a04a538653d9b0a8303a07
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5dc2ea8fe3a04a538653d9b0a8303a07
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5dc2ea8fe3a04a538653d9b0a8303a072021-11-11T14:23:42ZEffects of linseed processing method (ground versus extruded) and dietary crude protein content on performance, digestibility, ruminal fermentation pattern, and rumen protozoa population in growing lambs1594-40771828-051X10.1080/1828051X.2021.1984324https://doaj.org/article/5dc2ea8fe3a04a538653d9b0a8303a072021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2021.1984324https://doaj.org/toc/1594-4077https://doaj.org/toc/1828-051XThirty-six male lambs (averaging BW = 24.4 kg) were assigned in a completely randomised design with the factorial arrangement (nine lambs per each treatment) to assess the effects of linseed processing method (ground vs. extruded) and dietary crude protein content (12% vs. 15%, DM basis) on performance, digestibility, ruminal fermentation, and protozoa population. Treatments were; (1) ground linseed with 12% CP (GLS-12CP), (2) ground linseed with 15% CP (GLS-15CP), (3) extruded linseed with 12% CP (ELS-12CP), and (4) extruded linseed with 15% CP (ELS-15CP). The study lasted 84 d, and the lambs had free access to experimental diets and water. Outcomes showed that dry matter intake, digestibility of organic matter, and crude protein were increased in lambs fed ground linseed compared to extruded linseed. Feeding extruded linseed decreased urinary allantoin concentration, total purine derivatives (PD), the ruminal proportion of propionate, and blood concentration of glucose and HDL-cholesterol compared to ground linseed diets. Regarding dietary protein content, results showed that dry matter intake, urinary concentration of allantoin and total PD were increased in 15CP diets compared to 12CP diets. Considering the interaction, results showed that average daily gain was improved in GLS-15CP treatment compared to other experimental treatments. In conclusion, results show that grinding the linseed is more beneficial compared to its extrusion in lamb nutrition. Moreover, 15CP diets had a beneficial effect when fed with either ground or extruded linseed and seem to compensate, to some extent, the negative effects of extruded linseed on the gain of growing lambs.Highlights Linseed processing methods (ground vs. extruded) and dietary protein content (12 vs. 15%, DM basis) were evaluated in growing lambs Ground linseed increased average daily gain, improved digestibility, and microbial protein yield compared to extruded linseed Ground linseed was more favourable than extruded linseed and 15% CP diet has additional advantages either with the ground or extruded linseedElham AmirteymooriAmin KhezriOmid DayaniMohammadreza MohammadabadiSepideh KhorasaniAmir MousaieMehdi Kazemi-BonchenariTaylor & Francis Grouparticleoilseeds processinglinseedproteinruminal fermentationgrowing lambsAnimal cultureSF1-1100ENItalian Journal of Animal Science, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 1506-1517 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic oilseeds processing
linseed
protein
ruminal fermentation
growing lambs
Animal culture
SF1-1100
spellingShingle oilseeds processing
linseed
protein
ruminal fermentation
growing lambs
Animal culture
SF1-1100
Elham Amirteymoori
Amin Khezri
Omid Dayani
Mohammadreza Mohammadabadi
Sepideh Khorasani
Amir Mousaie
Mehdi Kazemi-Bonchenari
Effects of linseed processing method (ground versus extruded) and dietary crude protein content on performance, digestibility, ruminal fermentation pattern, and rumen protozoa population in growing lambs
description Thirty-six male lambs (averaging BW = 24.4 kg) were assigned in a completely randomised design with the factorial arrangement (nine lambs per each treatment) to assess the effects of linseed processing method (ground vs. extruded) and dietary crude protein content (12% vs. 15%, DM basis) on performance, digestibility, ruminal fermentation, and protozoa population. Treatments were; (1) ground linseed with 12% CP (GLS-12CP), (2) ground linseed with 15% CP (GLS-15CP), (3) extruded linseed with 12% CP (ELS-12CP), and (4) extruded linseed with 15% CP (ELS-15CP). The study lasted 84 d, and the lambs had free access to experimental diets and water. Outcomes showed that dry matter intake, digestibility of organic matter, and crude protein were increased in lambs fed ground linseed compared to extruded linseed. Feeding extruded linseed decreased urinary allantoin concentration, total purine derivatives (PD), the ruminal proportion of propionate, and blood concentration of glucose and HDL-cholesterol compared to ground linseed diets. Regarding dietary protein content, results showed that dry matter intake, urinary concentration of allantoin and total PD were increased in 15CP diets compared to 12CP diets. Considering the interaction, results showed that average daily gain was improved in GLS-15CP treatment compared to other experimental treatments. In conclusion, results show that grinding the linseed is more beneficial compared to its extrusion in lamb nutrition. Moreover, 15CP diets had a beneficial effect when fed with either ground or extruded linseed and seem to compensate, to some extent, the negative effects of extruded linseed on the gain of growing lambs.Highlights Linseed processing methods (ground vs. extruded) and dietary protein content (12 vs. 15%, DM basis) were evaluated in growing lambs Ground linseed increased average daily gain, improved digestibility, and microbial protein yield compared to extruded linseed Ground linseed was more favourable than extruded linseed and 15% CP diet has additional advantages either with the ground or extruded linseed
format article
author Elham Amirteymoori
Amin Khezri
Omid Dayani
Mohammadreza Mohammadabadi
Sepideh Khorasani
Amir Mousaie
Mehdi Kazemi-Bonchenari
author_facet Elham Amirteymoori
Amin Khezri
Omid Dayani
Mohammadreza Mohammadabadi
Sepideh Khorasani
Amir Mousaie
Mehdi Kazemi-Bonchenari
author_sort Elham Amirteymoori
title Effects of linseed processing method (ground versus extruded) and dietary crude protein content on performance, digestibility, ruminal fermentation pattern, and rumen protozoa population in growing lambs
title_short Effects of linseed processing method (ground versus extruded) and dietary crude protein content on performance, digestibility, ruminal fermentation pattern, and rumen protozoa population in growing lambs
title_full Effects of linseed processing method (ground versus extruded) and dietary crude protein content on performance, digestibility, ruminal fermentation pattern, and rumen protozoa population in growing lambs
title_fullStr Effects of linseed processing method (ground versus extruded) and dietary crude protein content on performance, digestibility, ruminal fermentation pattern, and rumen protozoa population in growing lambs
title_full_unstemmed Effects of linseed processing method (ground versus extruded) and dietary crude protein content on performance, digestibility, ruminal fermentation pattern, and rumen protozoa population in growing lambs
title_sort effects of linseed processing method (ground versus extruded) and dietary crude protein content on performance, digestibility, ruminal fermentation pattern, and rumen protozoa population in growing lambs
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/5dc2ea8fe3a04a538653d9b0a8303a07
work_keys_str_mv AT elhamamirteymoori effectsoflinseedprocessingmethodgroundversusextrudedanddietarycrudeproteincontentonperformancedigestibilityruminalfermentationpatternandrumenprotozoapopulationingrowinglambs
AT aminkhezri effectsoflinseedprocessingmethodgroundversusextrudedanddietarycrudeproteincontentonperformancedigestibilityruminalfermentationpatternandrumenprotozoapopulationingrowinglambs
AT omiddayani effectsoflinseedprocessingmethodgroundversusextrudedanddietarycrudeproteincontentonperformancedigestibilityruminalfermentationpatternandrumenprotozoapopulationingrowinglambs
AT mohammadrezamohammadabadi effectsoflinseedprocessingmethodgroundversusextrudedanddietarycrudeproteincontentonperformancedigestibilityruminalfermentationpatternandrumenprotozoapopulationingrowinglambs
AT sepidehkhorasani effectsoflinseedprocessingmethodgroundversusextrudedanddietarycrudeproteincontentonperformancedigestibilityruminalfermentationpatternandrumenprotozoapopulationingrowinglambs
AT amirmousaie effectsoflinseedprocessingmethodgroundversusextrudedanddietarycrudeproteincontentonperformancedigestibilityruminalfermentationpatternandrumenprotozoapopulationingrowinglambs
AT mehdikazemibonchenari effectsoflinseedprocessingmethodgroundversusextrudedanddietarycrudeproteincontentonperformancedigestibilityruminalfermentationpatternandrumenprotozoapopulationingrowinglambs
_version_ 1718438938488602624