Comparing Two Stages of Teacher Assessment From Students Prospective

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Having students' opinions is an appropriate method for teachers' educational development. Accomplishment of evaluation and acquired scores always have been challenged, so the aim of the present study was to compare two stages of teacher evaluation from st...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohammad . Taghipour-Darzi, man Jahanian, holamreza Bineshpajooh
Formato: article
Lenguaje:FA
Publicado: Babol University of Medical Sciences 2013
Materias:
R
L
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5e8fd855afb34270891122dad795c9af
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5e8fd855afb34270891122dad795c9af
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5e8fd855afb34270891122dad795c9af2021-11-24T09:04:15ZComparing Two Stages of Teacher Assessment From Students Prospective2322-49402345-5497https://doaj.org/article/5e8fd855afb34270891122dad795c9af2013-03-01T00:00:00Zhttp://mededj.ir/article-1-27-en.htmlhttps://doaj.org/toc/2322-4940https://doaj.org/toc/2345-5497ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Having students' opinions is an appropriate method for teachers' educational development. Accomplishment of evaluation and acquired scores always have been challenged, so the aim of the present study was to compare two stages of teacher evaluation from students' opinion. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 110 students during the second term of educational year 1388-1389 to 1389-1390 participated. Assessment was done by form No.3 of Educational Development Center (EDC) which contained 13 questions. First evaluation was done by EDC. The second evaluation was done in the last session by the teacher. Data analyzed by paired t-test and wilcoxon with SPSS version 15. FINDINGS: Results of paired t-test showed that there was no significant difference between two evaluation (p=0.46). Wilcoxon test was used to compare each question of questionnaire for lack of normal distribution and results did not show significant differences for all the 13 questions. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated no differences according to the time of evaluation. Besides, no differences were seen between evaluations done by the teacher and another evaluator. If results are going to be used for any decision making about the teacher, it is recommended to perform evaluation in several terms, so, the teachers can be informed about their ranking in comparison with other colleagues.Mohammad . Taghipour-Darziman Jahanianholamreza BineshpajoohBabol University of Medical SciencesarticleteacherevaluationstudentsMedicineREducationLFAآموزش پزشکی, Vol 1, Iss 1, Pp 40-44 (2013)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language FA
topic teacher
evaluation
students
Medicine
R
Education
L
spellingShingle teacher
evaluation
students
Medicine
R
Education
L
Mohammad . Taghipour-Darzi
man Jahanian
holamreza Bineshpajooh
Comparing Two Stages of Teacher Assessment From Students Prospective
description ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Having students' opinions is an appropriate method for teachers' educational development. Accomplishment of evaluation and acquired scores always have been challenged, so the aim of the present study was to compare two stages of teacher evaluation from students' opinion. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 110 students during the second term of educational year 1388-1389 to 1389-1390 participated. Assessment was done by form No.3 of Educational Development Center (EDC) which contained 13 questions. First evaluation was done by EDC. The second evaluation was done in the last session by the teacher. Data analyzed by paired t-test and wilcoxon with SPSS version 15. FINDINGS: Results of paired t-test showed that there was no significant difference between two evaluation (p=0.46). Wilcoxon test was used to compare each question of questionnaire for lack of normal distribution and results did not show significant differences for all the 13 questions. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated no differences according to the time of evaluation. Besides, no differences were seen between evaluations done by the teacher and another evaluator. If results are going to be used for any decision making about the teacher, it is recommended to perform evaluation in several terms, so, the teachers can be informed about their ranking in comparison with other colleagues.
format article
author Mohammad . Taghipour-Darzi
man Jahanian
holamreza Bineshpajooh
author_facet Mohammad . Taghipour-Darzi
man Jahanian
holamreza Bineshpajooh
author_sort Mohammad . Taghipour-Darzi
title Comparing Two Stages of Teacher Assessment From Students Prospective
title_short Comparing Two Stages of Teacher Assessment From Students Prospective
title_full Comparing Two Stages of Teacher Assessment From Students Prospective
title_fullStr Comparing Two Stages of Teacher Assessment From Students Prospective
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Two Stages of Teacher Assessment From Students Prospective
title_sort comparing two stages of teacher assessment from students prospective
publisher Babol University of Medical Sciences
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/5e8fd855afb34270891122dad795c9af
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadtaghipourdarzi comparingtwostagesofteacherassessmentfromstudentsprospective
AT manjahanian comparingtwostagesofteacherassessmentfromstudentsprospective
AT holamrezabineshpajooh comparingtwostagesofteacherassessmentfromstudentsprospective
_version_ 1718415799448764416