Effects of whole-body cryotherapy vs. far-infrared vs. passive modalities on recovery from exercise-induced muscle damage in highly-trained runners.

Enhanced recovery following physical activity and exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD) has become a priority for athletes. Consequently, a number of post-exercise recovery strategies are used, often without scientific evidence of their benefits. Within this framework, the purpose of this study was...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christophe Hausswirth, Julien Louis, François Bieuzen, Hervé Pournot, Jean Fournier, Jean-Robert Filliard, Jeanick Brisswalter
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/60327d3759144839b9a1e66d37b56664
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:60327d3759144839b9a1e66d37b56664
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:60327d3759144839b9a1e66d37b566642021-11-18T07:32:53ZEffects of whole-body cryotherapy vs. far-infrared vs. passive modalities on recovery from exercise-induced muscle damage in highly-trained runners.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0027749https://doaj.org/article/60327d3759144839b9a1e66d37b566642011-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22163272/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Enhanced recovery following physical activity and exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD) has become a priority for athletes. Consequently, a number of post-exercise recovery strategies are used, often without scientific evidence of their benefits. Within this framework, the purpose of this study was to test the efficacy of whole body cryotherapy (WBC), far infrared (FIR) or passive (PAS) modalities in hastening muscular recovery within the 48 hours after a simulated trail running race. In 3 non-adjoining weeks, 9 well-trained runners performed 3 repetitions of a simulated trail run on a motorized treadmill, designed to induce muscle damage. Immediately (post), post 24 h, and post 48 h after exercise, all participants tested three different recovery modalities (WBC, FIR, PAS) in a random order over the three separate weeks. Markers of muscle damage (maximal isometric muscle strength, plasma creatine kinase [CK] activity and perceived sensations [i.e. pain, tiredness, well-being]) were recorded before, immediately after (post), post 1 h, post 24 h, and post 48 h after exercise. In all testing sessions, the simulated 48 min trail run induced a similar, significant amount of muscle damage. Maximal muscle strength and perceived sensations were recovered after the first WBC session (post 1 h), while recovery took 24 h with FIR, and was not attained through the PAS recovery modality. No differences in plasma CK activity were recorded between conditions. Three WBC sessions performed within the 48 hours after a damaging running exercise accelerate recovery from EIMD to a greater extent than FIR or PAS modalities.Christophe HausswirthJulien LouisFrançois BieuzenFrançois BieuzenHervé PournotJean FournierJean-Robert FilliardJeanick BrisswalterPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 6, Iss 12, p e27749 (2011)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Christophe Hausswirth
Julien Louis
François Bieuzen
François Bieuzen
Hervé Pournot
Jean Fournier
Jean-Robert Filliard
Jeanick Brisswalter
Effects of whole-body cryotherapy vs. far-infrared vs. passive modalities on recovery from exercise-induced muscle damage in highly-trained runners.
description Enhanced recovery following physical activity and exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD) has become a priority for athletes. Consequently, a number of post-exercise recovery strategies are used, often without scientific evidence of their benefits. Within this framework, the purpose of this study was to test the efficacy of whole body cryotherapy (WBC), far infrared (FIR) or passive (PAS) modalities in hastening muscular recovery within the 48 hours after a simulated trail running race. In 3 non-adjoining weeks, 9 well-trained runners performed 3 repetitions of a simulated trail run on a motorized treadmill, designed to induce muscle damage. Immediately (post), post 24 h, and post 48 h after exercise, all participants tested three different recovery modalities (WBC, FIR, PAS) in a random order over the three separate weeks. Markers of muscle damage (maximal isometric muscle strength, plasma creatine kinase [CK] activity and perceived sensations [i.e. pain, tiredness, well-being]) were recorded before, immediately after (post), post 1 h, post 24 h, and post 48 h after exercise. In all testing sessions, the simulated 48 min trail run induced a similar, significant amount of muscle damage. Maximal muscle strength and perceived sensations were recovered after the first WBC session (post 1 h), while recovery took 24 h with FIR, and was not attained through the PAS recovery modality. No differences in plasma CK activity were recorded between conditions. Three WBC sessions performed within the 48 hours after a damaging running exercise accelerate recovery from EIMD to a greater extent than FIR or PAS modalities.
format article
author Christophe Hausswirth
Julien Louis
François Bieuzen
François Bieuzen
Hervé Pournot
Jean Fournier
Jean-Robert Filliard
Jeanick Brisswalter
author_facet Christophe Hausswirth
Julien Louis
François Bieuzen
François Bieuzen
Hervé Pournot
Jean Fournier
Jean-Robert Filliard
Jeanick Brisswalter
author_sort Christophe Hausswirth
title Effects of whole-body cryotherapy vs. far-infrared vs. passive modalities on recovery from exercise-induced muscle damage in highly-trained runners.
title_short Effects of whole-body cryotherapy vs. far-infrared vs. passive modalities on recovery from exercise-induced muscle damage in highly-trained runners.
title_full Effects of whole-body cryotherapy vs. far-infrared vs. passive modalities on recovery from exercise-induced muscle damage in highly-trained runners.
title_fullStr Effects of whole-body cryotherapy vs. far-infrared vs. passive modalities on recovery from exercise-induced muscle damage in highly-trained runners.
title_full_unstemmed Effects of whole-body cryotherapy vs. far-infrared vs. passive modalities on recovery from exercise-induced muscle damage in highly-trained runners.
title_sort effects of whole-body cryotherapy vs. far-infrared vs. passive modalities on recovery from exercise-induced muscle damage in highly-trained runners.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2011
url https://doaj.org/article/60327d3759144839b9a1e66d37b56664
work_keys_str_mv AT christophehausswirth effectsofwholebodycryotherapyvsfarinfraredvspassivemodalitiesonrecoveryfromexerciseinducedmuscledamageinhighlytrainedrunners
AT julienlouis effectsofwholebodycryotherapyvsfarinfraredvspassivemodalitiesonrecoveryfromexerciseinducedmuscledamageinhighlytrainedrunners
AT francoisbieuzen effectsofwholebodycryotherapyvsfarinfraredvspassivemodalitiesonrecoveryfromexerciseinducedmuscledamageinhighlytrainedrunners
AT francoisbieuzen effectsofwholebodycryotherapyvsfarinfraredvspassivemodalitiesonrecoveryfromexerciseinducedmuscledamageinhighlytrainedrunners
AT hervepournot effectsofwholebodycryotherapyvsfarinfraredvspassivemodalitiesonrecoveryfromexerciseinducedmuscledamageinhighlytrainedrunners
AT jeanfournier effectsofwholebodycryotherapyvsfarinfraredvspassivemodalitiesonrecoveryfromexerciseinducedmuscledamageinhighlytrainedrunners
AT jeanrobertfilliard effectsofwholebodycryotherapyvsfarinfraredvspassivemodalitiesonrecoveryfromexerciseinducedmuscledamageinhighlytrainedrunners
AT jeanickbrisswalter effectsofwholebodycryotherapyvsfarinfraredvspassivemodalitiesonrecoveryfromexerciseinducedmuscledamageinhighlytrainedrunners
_version_ 1718423287138091008