Letter to the Editor
The authors respond to a previously published JMBE article, “The CREATE Method Does Not Result in Greater Gains in Critical Thinking than a More Traditional Method of Analyzing the Primary Literature” by M. Segura-Totten and N. Dalman (JMBE 14: 166–175, 2013).
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Sally G. Hoskins, Kristy L. Kenyon |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
American Society for Microbiology
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/6040167b01ec4a02b9542167efe51ae4 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
A Single, Narrowly Focused CREATE Primary Literature Module Evokes Gains in Genetics Students’ Self-Efficacy and Understanding of the Research Process
por: Alison Krufka, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
CREATE Two-Year/Four-Year Faculty Workshops: A Focus on Practice, Reflection, and Novel Curricular Design Leads to Diverse Gains for Faculty at Two-Year and Four-Year Institutions
por: Sally G. Hoskins, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Letter to the Editor
por: Pamela A. Marshall
Publicado: (2016) -
Letter to the Editor
por: Thomas K. Karikari
Publicado: (2015) -
Letter to the Editor
por: Elise N. Griswold, et al.
Publicado: (2015)