Patient involvement in resident assessment within the Competence by Design context: a mixed-methods study

Background: Patients can contribute to resident assessment in Competence by Design (CBD). This study explored the extent, nature, as well as the facilitators and hindrances of patient involvement in resident assessment within and across Canadian specialty/sub-specialty/special programs that are tran...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Katherine Moreau, Kaylee Eady, Mona Jabbour
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Canadian Medical Education Journal 2019
Materias:	patients assessment Competence by Design Education (General) L7-991 Medicine (General) R5-920
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/621cd49b10894eeabd600aa0d891500b
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:621cd49b10894eeabd600aa0d891500b
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:621cd49b10894eeabd600aa0d891500b2021-12-01T22:43:59ZPatient involvement in resident assessment within the Competence by Design context: a mixed-methods study10.36834/cmej.568811923-1202https://doaj.org/article/621cd49b10894eeabd600aa0d891500b2019-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cmej/article/view/56881https://doaj.org/toc/1923-1202Background: Patients can contribute to resident assessment in Competence by Design (CBD). This study explored the extent, nature, as well as the facilitators and hindrances of patient involvement in resident assessment within and across Canadian specialty/sub-specialty/special programs that are transitioning or have transitioned to CBD. Methods: We used a two-phase sequential explanatory mixed-methods design. In Phase 1, we surveyed program directors (PDs). In Phase 2, we interviewed PDs from Phase 1. Results: In Phase 1, 63 (62.4%) respondents in the CBD preparation stage, do not know if patients will be involved in resident assessment, 21 (20.8%) will involve patients, and 17 (16.8%) will not involve patients. Of those in the field-testing or implementation stages, 24 (72.7%) do not involve patients in resident assessment, five (15.2%) do involve patients, and four (12.1%) do not know if they involve patients. In Phase 2, 12 interviewees raised nine factors that facilitate or hinder patient involvement including, patients’ interests/abilities, guidelines/processes for patient involvement, type of Entrustable Professional Activities, type of patient interactions in programs, and support from healthcare organizations. Conclusion: Patient involvement in resident assessment is limited. We need to engage in discussions on how to support such involvement within CBD. Katherine MoreauKaylee EadyMona JabbourCanadian Medical Education JournalarticlepatientsassessmentCompetence by DesignEducation (General)L7-991Medicine (General)R5-920ENCanadian Medical Education Journal, Vol 10, Iss 1 (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	patients assessment Competence by Design Education (General) L7-991 Medicine (General) R5-920
spellingShingle	patients assessment Competence by Design Education (General) L7-991 Medicine (General) R5-920 Katherine Moreau Kaylee Eady Mona Jabbour Patient involvement in resident assessment within the Competence by Design context: a mixed-methods study
description	Background: Patients can contribute to resident assessment in Competence by Design (CBD). This study explored the extent, nature, as well as the facilitators and hindrances of patient involvement in resident assessment within and across Canadian specialty/sub-specialty/special programs that are transitioning or have transitioned to CBD. Methods: We used a two-phase sequential explanatory mixed-methods design. In Phase 1, we surveyed program directors (PDs). In Phase 2, we interviewed PDs from Phase 1. Results: In Phase 1, 63 (62.4%) respondents in the CBD preparation stage, do not know if patients will be involved in resident assessment, 21 (20.8%) will involve patients, and 17 (16.8%) will not involve patients. Of those in the field-testing or implementation stages, 24 (72.7%) do not involve patients in resident assessment, five (15.2%) do involve patients, and four (12.1%) do not know if they involve patients. In Phase 2, 12 interviewees raised nine factors that facilitate or hinder patient involvement including, patients’ interests/abilities, guidelines/processes for patient involvement, type of Entrustable Professional Activities, type of patient interactions in programs, and support from healthcare organizations. Conclusion: Patient involvement in resident assessment is limited. We need to engage in discussions on how to support such involvement within CBD.
format	article
author	Katherine Moreau Kaylee Eady Mona Jabbour
author_facet	Katherine Moreau Kaylee Eady Mona Jabbour
author_sort	Katherine Moreau
title	Patient involvement in resident assessment within the Competence by Design context: a mixed-methods study
title_short	Patient involvement in resident assessment within the Competence by Design context: a mixed-methods study
title_full	Patient involvement in resident assessment within the Competence by Design context: a mixed-methods study
title_fullStr	Patient involvement in resident assessment within the Competence by Design context: a mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed	Patient involvement in resident assessment within the Competence by Design context: a mixed-methods study
title_sort	patient involvement in resident assessment within the competence by design context: a mixed-methods study
publisher	Canadian Medical Education Journal
publishDate	2019
url	https://doaj.org/article/621cd49b10894eeabd600aa0d891500b
work_keys_str_mv	AT katherinemoreau patientinvolvementinresidentassessmentwithinthecompetencebydesigncontextamixedmethodsstudy AT kayleeeady patientinvolvementinresidentassessmentwithinthecompetencebydesigncontextamixedmethodsstudy AT monajabbour patientinvolvementinresidentassessmentwithinthecompetencebydesigncontextamixedmethodsstudy
_version_	1718404042924752896

Patient involvement in resident assessment within the Competence by Design context: a mixed-methods study

Ejemplares similares