A comparison of formic acid or monoglycerides to formaldehyde on production efficiency, nutrient absorption, and meat yield and quality of Cobb 700 broilers

ABSTRACT: After being banned by the European Commission in 2018, the use of formaldehyde as a feed amendment in the United States has come into question. Therefore, this study was conducted to explore alternatives to formaldehyde, such as formic acid and monoglycerides, and their effects on poultry...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	K.M. Feye, D.K. Dittoe, J.A. Jendza, J.P. Caldas-Cueva, B.A. Mallmann, B. Booher, G. Tellez-Isaias, C.M. Owens, M.T. Kidd, S.C. Ricke
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Elsevier 2021
Materias:	broiler Cobb 700 formaldehyde formic acid monoglyceride Animal culture SF1-1100
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/6c7ee874defd4f908140e257b26132b7
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:6c7ee874defd4f908140e257b26132b7
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:6c7ee874defd4f908140e257b26132b72021-11-24T04:21:56ZA comparison of formic acid or monoglycerides to formaldehyde on production efficiency, nutrient absorption, and meat yield and quality of Cobb 700 broilers0032-579110.1016/j.psj.2021.101476https://doaj.org/article/6c7ee874defd4f908140e257b26132b72021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579121004983https://doaj.org/toc/0032-5791ABSTRACT: After being banned by the European Commission in 2018, the use of formaldehyde as a feed amendment in the United States has come into question. Therefore, this study was conducted to explore alternatives to formaldehyde, such as formic acid and monoglycerides, and their effects on poultry production. In total, 1,728 Cobb 700 broilers were randomly assigned to 96-floor pens on day of hatch (18 birds/pen). Using a randomized complete block design (4 blocks), treatments were assigned to pens with blocking based on location within the barn, with the eastern half of the barn designated for digestibility and the western half designated for production (per experiment: 8 control pens and 10 pens per treatment). All diets were based on a negative control (NC), basal diet. Dietary treatments consisted of: NC, NC + 0.25% formalin (F), NC + 0.25 and 0.50% Amasil NA (AML and AMH; 61% formic acid and 20.5% Na-formate), and NC + SILO Health 104L (SILO; mixture of monoglycerides; 0.5% from 0 to 14 d, 0.4% from 14 to 28 d, and 0.2% from 28 to 42 d). Water and feed were provided ad libitum. Performance data were collected during feed changes on d 0, 14, 28, and 42, with digestibility data collected at d 14 (2 per pen) and carcass quality (6 per pen) assessed at d 46 with a randomly selected group of broilers. A one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison, where treatments were evaluated against F were conducted using JMP 14.0 (P ≤ 0.05). Main effect of treatment was significant for performance, nutrient digestibility, and carcass quality. Differences in body weight and ADG were observed from d 14 to d 28, resulting in a trending improvement in lysine digestibility on d 14 and carcass quality on d 46 of birds fed AML and AMH in comparison to those fed F (P < 0.05). Whereas birds fed SILO had reduced digestibility of methionine on d 14 and a decrease in meat quality on d 46 in comparison to those fed F (P < 0.05). Therefore, Amasil NA at 0.25 or 0.50% may be an effective alternative to formaldehyde as a feed amendment for poultry production.K.M. FeyeD.K. DittoeJ.A. JendzaJ.P. Caldas-CuevaB.A. MallmannB. BooherG. Tellez-IsaiasC.M. OwensM.T. KiddS.C. RickeElsevierarticlebroilerCobb 700formaldehydeformic acidmonoglycerideAnimal cultureSF1-1100ENPoultry Science, Vol 100, Iss 12, Pp 101476- (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	broiler Cobb 700 formaldehyde formic acid monoglyceride Animal culture SF1-1100
spellingShingle	broiler Cobb 700 formaldehyde formic acid monoglyceride Animal culture SF1-1100 K.M. Feye D.K. Dittoe J.A. Jendza J.P. Caldas-Cueva B.A. Mallmann B. Booher G. Tellez-Isaias C.M. Owens M.T. Kidd S.C. Ricke A comparison of formic acid or monoglycerides to formaldehyde on production efficiency, nutrient absorption, and meat yield and quality of Cobb 700 broilers
description	ABSTRACT: After being banned by the European Commission in 2018, the use of formaldehyde as a feed amendment in the United States has come into question. Therefore, this study was conducted to explore alternatives to formaldehyde, such as formic acid and monoglycerides, and their effects on poultry production. In total, 1,728 Cobb 700 broilers were randomly assigned to 96-floor pens on day of hatch (18 birds/pen). Using a randomized complete block design (4 blocks), treatments were assigned to pens with blocking based on location within the barn, with the eastern half of the barn designated for digestibility and the western half designated for production (per experiment: 8 control pens and 10 pens per treatment). All diets were based on a negative control (NC), basal diet. Dietary treatments consisted of: NC, NC + 0.25% formalin (F), NC + 0.25 and 0.50% Amasil NA (AML and AMH; 61% formic acid and 20.5% Na-formate), and NC + SILO Health 104L (SILO; mixture of monoglycerides; 0.5% from 0 to 14 d, 0.4% from 14 to 28 d, and 0.2% from 28 to 42 d). Water and feed were provided ad libitum. Performance data were collected during feed changes on d 0, 14, 28, and 42, with digestibility data collected at d 14 (2 per pen) and carcass quality (6 per pen) assessed at d 46 with a randomly selected group of broilers. A one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison, where treatments were evaluated against F were conducted using JMP 14.0 (P ≤ 0.05). Main effect of treatment was significant for performance, nutrient digestibility, and carcass quality. Differences in body weight and ADG were observed from d 14 to d 28, resulting in a trending improvement in lysine digestibility on d 14 and carcass quality on d 46 of birds fed AML and AMH in comparison to those fed F (P < 0.05). Whereas birds fed SILO had reduced digestibility of methionine on d 14 and a decrease in meat quality on d 46 in comparison to those fed F (P < 0.05). Therefore, Amasil NA at 0.25 or 0.50% may be an effective alternative to formaldehyde as a feed amendment for poultry production.
format	article
author	K.M. Feye D.K. Dittoe J.A. Jendza J.P. Caldas-Cueva B.A. Mallmann B. Booher G. Tellez-Isaias C.M. Owens M.T. Kidd S.C. Ricke
author_facet	K.M. Feye D.K. Dittoe J.A. Jendza J.P. Caldas-Cueva B.A. Mallmann B. Booher G. Tellez-Isaias C.M. Owens M.T. Kidd S.C. Ricke
author_sort	K.M. Feye
title	A comparison of formic acid or monoglycerides to formaldehyde on production efficiency, nutrient absorption, and meat yield and quality of Cobb 700 broilers
title_short	A comparison of formic acid or monoglycerides to formaldehyde on production efficiency, nutrient absorption, and meat yield and quality of Cobb 700 broilers
title_full	A comparison of formic acid or monoglycerides to formaldehyde on production efficiency, nutrient absorption, and meat yield and quality of Cobb 700 broilers
title_fullStr	A comparison of formic acid or monoglycerides to formaldehyde on production efficiency, nutrient absorption, and meat yield and quality of Cobb 700 broilers
title_full_unstemmed	A comparison of formic acid or monoglycerides to formaldehyde on production efficiency, nutrient absorption, and meat yield and quality of Cobb 700 broilers
title_sort	comparison of formic acid or monoglycerides to formaldehyde on production efficiency, nutrient absorption, and meat yield and quality of cobb 700 broilers
publisher	Elsevier
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/6c7ee874defd4f908140e257b26132b7
work_keys_str_mv	AT kmfeye acomparisonofformicacidormonoglyceridestoformaldehydeonproductionefficiencynutrientabsorptionandmeatyieldandqualityofcobb700broilers AT dkdittoe acomparisonofformicacidormonoglyceridestoformaldehydeonproductionefficiencynutrientabsorptionandmeatyieldandqualityofcobb700broilers AT jajendza acomparisonofformicacidormonoglyceridestoformaldehydeonproductionefficiencynutrientabsorptionandmeatyieldandqualityofcobb700broilers AT jpcaldascueva acomparisonofformicacidormonoglyceridestoformaldehydeonproductionefficiencynutrientabsorptionandmeatyieldandqualityofcobb700broilers AT bamallmann acomparisonofformicacidormonoglyceridestoformaldehydeonproductionefficiencynutrientabsorptionandmeatyieldandqualityofcobb700broilers AT bbooher acomparisonofformicacidormonoglyceridestoformaldehydeonproductionefficiencynutrientabsorptionandmeatyieldandqualityofcobb700broilers AT gtellezisaias acomparisonofformicacidormonoglyceridestoformaldehydeonproductionefficiencynutrientabsorptionandmeatyieldandqualityofcobb700broilers AT cmowens acomparisonofformicacidormonoglyceridestoformaldehydeonproductionefficiencynutrientabsorptionandmeatyieldandqualityofcobb700broilers AT mtkidd acomparisonofformicacidormonoglyceridestoformaldehydeonproductionefficiencynutrientabsorptionandmeatyieldandqualityofcobb700broilers AT scricke acomparisonofformicacidormonoglyceridestoformaldehydeonproductionefficiencynutrientabsorptionandmeatyieldandqualityofcobb700broilers AT kmfeye comparisonofformicacidormonoglyceridestoformaldehydeonproductionefficiencynutrientabsorptionandmeatyieldandqualityofcobb700broilers AT dkdittoe comparisonofformicacidormonoglyceridestoformaldehydeonproductionefficiencynutrientabsorptionandmeatyieldandqualityofcobb700broilers AT jajendza comparisonofformicacidormonoglyceridestoformaldehydeonproductionefficiencynutrientabsorptionandmeatyieldandqualityofcobb700broilers AT jpcaldascueva comparisonofformicacidormonoglyceridestoformaldehydeonproductionefficiencynutrientabsorptionandmeatyieldandqualityofcobb700broilers AT bamallmann comparisonofformicacidormonoglyceridestoformaldehydeonproductionefficiencynutrientabsorptionandmeatyieldandqualityofcobb700broilers AT bbooher comparisonofformicacidormonoglyceridestoformaldehydeonproductionefficiencynutrientabsorptionandmeatyieldandqualityofcobb700broilers AT gtellezisaias comparisonofformicacidormonoglyceridestoformaldehydeonproductionefficiencynutrientabsorptionandmeatyieldandqualityofcobb700broilers AT cmowens comparisonofformicacidormonoglyceridestoformaldehydeonproductionefficiencynutrientabsorptionandmeatyieldandqualityofcobb700broilers AT mtkidd comparisonofformicacidormonoglyceridestoformaldehydeonproductionefficiencynutrientabsorptionandmeatyieldandqualityofcobb700broilers AT scricke comparisonofformicacidormonoglyceridestoformaldehydeonproductionefficiencynutrientabsorptionandmeatyieldandqualityofcobb700broilers
_version_	1718416038463275008

A comparison of formic acid or monoglycerides to formaldehyde on production efficiency, nutrient absorption, and meat yield and quality of Cobb 700 broilers

Ejemplares similares