The design and implementation of the Carolina Automated Reading Evaluation for reading deficit screening

This paper examines the design process and implementation of the Carolina Automated Reading Evaluation (CARE). Designed to automate the process of screening for reading deficits, CARE is an interactive computer-based tool that helps eliminate the need for one-on-one evaluations of pupils to detect d...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: William H. Hoskins, William I. Hobbs, Michael J. Eason, Scott Decker, Jijun Tang
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/719b547d0f8f4f38a0545740619d1d4e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:719b547d0f8f4f38a0545740619d1d4e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:719b547d0f8f4f38a0545740619d1d4e2021-12-01T05:04:30ZThe design and implementation of the Carolina Automated Reading Evaluation for reading deficit screening2451-958810.1016/j.chbr.2021.100123https://doaj.org/article/719b547d0f8f4f38a0545740619d1d4e2021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958821000713https://doaj.org/toc/2451-9588This paper examines the design process and implementation of the Carolina Automated Reading Evaluation (CARE). Designed to automate the process of screening for reading deficits, CARE is an interactive computer-based tool that helps eliminate the need for one-on-one evaluations of pupils to detect dyslexia and other reading deficits. While other tests collect specific data points in order to determine whether a pupil has dyslexia, they typically focus on only a few metrics for diagnosis, such as handwriting analysis or eye tracking. The CARE collects data across up to 16 different subtests, each built to test proficiency in various reading skills. These skills include reading fluency, phoneme manipulation, sound blending, and many other essential skills for reading. This wide variety of measurements allows for a more focused intervention to be created for the pupil. For this study, elementary school pupils were tested both with the CARE and with the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) test, a well-established screener for elementary school-level reading deficits. The data collected was used in a comparison of average scores, a gradient boosting tree classifier, and a convergence test to determine if there was any correlation between the CARE and DIBELS scores. Based on these comparisons, a correspondence was found between the two tests, showing that the CARE can detect reading deficits comparable to manually administered testing instruments. Based on these findings, the CARE could be used as a replacement for current tests, giving the users more detailed data at a faster rate. This paper reviews the technical development and preliminary analysis of the CARE. It also provides insights into key considerations when translating standard psychological screeners onto computerized platforms.William H. HoskinsWilliam I. HobbsMichael J. EasonScott DeckerJijun TangElsevierarticleApplied computingSocial and behavioral sciencesPsychologyEducation/learningReading assessmentDyslexiaElectronic computers. Computer scienceQA75.5-76.95PsychologyBF1-990ENComputers in Human Behavior Reports, Vol 4, Iss , Pp 100123- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Applied computing
Social and behavioral sciences
Psychology
Education/learning
Reading assessment
Dyslexia
Electronic computers. Computer science
QA75.5-76.95
Psychology
BF1-990
spellingShingle Applied computing
Social and behavioral sciences
Psychology
Education/learning
Reading assessment
Dyslexia
Electronic computers. Computer science
QA75.5-76.95
Psychology
BF1-990
William H. Hoskins
William I. Hobbs
Michael J. Eason
Scott Decker
Jijun Tang
The design and implementation of the Carolina Automated Reading Evaluation for reading deficit screening
description This paper examines the design process and implementation of the Carolina Automated Reading Evaluation (CARE). Designed to automate the process of screening for reading deficits, CARE is an interactive computer-based tool that helps eliminate the need for one-on-one evaluations of pupils to detect dyslexia and other reading deficits. While other tests collect specific data points in order to determine whether a pupil has dyslexia, they typically focus on only a few metrics for diagnosis, such as handwriting analysis or eye tracking. The CARE collects data across up to 16 different subtests, each built to test proficiency in various reading skills. These skills include reading fluency, phoneme manipulation, sound blending, and many other essential skills for reading. This wide variety of measurements allows for a more focused intervention to be created for the pupil. For this study, elementary school pupils were tested both with the CARE and with the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) test, a well-established screener for elementary school-level reading deficits. The data collected was used in a comparison of average scores, a gradient boosting tree classifier, and a convergence test to determine if there was any correlation between the CARE and DIBELS scores. Based on these comparisons, a correspondence was found between the two tests, showing that the CARE can detect reading deficits comparable to manually administered testing instruments. Based on these findings, the CARE could be used as a replacement for current tests, giving the users more detailed data at a faster rate. This paper reviews the technical development and preliminary analysis of the CARE. It also provides insights into key considerations when translating standard psychological screeners onto computerized platforms.
format article
author William H. Hoskins
William I. Hobbs
Michael J. Eason
Scott Decker
Jijun Tang
author_facet William H. Hoskins
William I. Hobbs
Michael J. Eason
Scott Decker
Jijun Tang
author_sort William H. Hoskins
title The design and implementation of the Carolina Automated Reading Evaluation for reading deficit screening
title_short The design and implementation of the Carolina Automated Reading Evaluation for reading deficit screening
title_full The design and implementation of the Carolina Automated Reading Evaluation for reading deficit screening
title_fullStr The design and implementation of the Carolina Automated Reading Evaluation for reading deficit screening
title_full_unstemmed The design and implementation of the Carolina Automated Reading Evaluation for reading deficit screening
title_sort design and implementation of the carolina automated reading evaluation for reading deficit screening
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/719b547d0f8f4f38a0545740619d1d4e
work_keys_str_mv AT williamhhoskins thedesignandimplementationofthecarolinaautomatedreadingevaluationforreadingdeficitscreening
AT williamihobbs thedesignandimplementationofthecarolinaautomatedreadingevaluationforreadingdeficitscreening
AT michaeljeason thedesignandimplementationofthecarolinaautomatedreadingevaluationforreadingdeficitscreening
AT scottdecker thedesignandimplementationofthecarolinaautomatedreadingevaluationforreadingdeficitscreening
AT jijuntang thedesignandimplementationofthecarolinaautomatedreadingevaluationforreadingdeficitscreening
AT williamhhoskins designandimplementationofthecarolinaautomatedreadingevaluationforreadingdeficitscreening
AT williamihobbs designandimplementationofthecarolinaautomatedreadingevaluationforreadingdeficitscreening
AT michaeljeason designandimplementationofthecarolinaautomatedreadingevaluationforreadingdeficitscreening
AT scottdecker designandimplementationofthecarolinaautomatedreadingevaluationforreadingdeficitscreening
AT jijuntang designandimplementationofthecarolinaautomatedreadingevaluationforreadingdeficitscreening
_version_ 1718405548088492032