Dynamic Bayesian Networks for Evaluation of Granger Causal Relationships in Climate Reanalyses

Abstract We apply a Bayesian structure learning approach to study interactions between global climate modes, so illustrating its use as a framework for developing process‐based diagnostics with which to evaluate climate models. Homogeneous dynamic Bayesian network models are constructed for time ser...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dylan Harries, Terence J. O'Kane
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/720c584245b34176b886e6888ef0141d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:720c584245b34176b886e6888ef0141d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:720c584245b34176b886e6888ef0141d2021-11-24T08:11:41ZDynamic Bayesian Networks for Evaluation of Granger Causal Relationships in Climate Reanalyses1942-246610.1029/2020MS002442https://doaj.org/article/720c584245b34176b886e6888ef0141d2021-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002442https://doaj.org/toc/1942-2466Abstract We apply a Bayesian structure learning approach to study interactions between global climate modes, so illustrating its use as a framework for developing process‐based diagnostics with which to evaluate climate models. Homogeneous dynamic Bayesian network models are constructed for time series of empirical indices diagnosing the activity of major tropical, Northern and Southern Hemisphere modes of climate variability in the NCEP/NCAR and JRA‐55 reanalyses. The resulting probabilistic graphical models are comparable to Granger causal analyses that have recently been advocated. Reversible jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo is employed to provide a quantification of the uncertainty associated with the selection of a single network structure. In general, the models fitted from the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis and the JRA‐55 reanalysis are found to exhibit broad agreement in terms of associations for which there is high posterior confidence. Differences between the two reanalyses are found that involve modes for which known biases are present or that may be attributed to seasonal effects, as well as for features that, while present in point estimates, have low overall posterior mass. We argue that the ability to incorporate such measures of confidence in structural features is a significant advantage provided by the Bayesian approach, as point estimates alone may understate the relevant uncertainties and yield less informative measures of differences between products when network‐based approaches are used for model evaluation.Dylan HarriesTerence J. O'KaneAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)articleBayesiangraphical modelsteleconnectionsPhysical geographyGB3-5030OceanographyGC1-1581ENJournal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol 13, Iss 5, Pp n/a-n/a (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Bayesian
graphical models
teleconnections
Physical geography
GB3-5030
Oceanography
GC1-1581
spellingShingle Bayesian
graphical models
teleconnections
Physical geography
GB3-5030
Oceanography
GC1-1581
Dylan Harries
Terence J. O'Kane
Dynamic Bayesian Networks for Evaluation of Granger Causal Relationships in Climate Reanalyses
description Abstract We apply a Bayesian structure learning approach to study interactions between global climate modes, so illustrating its use as a framework for developing process‐based diagnostics with which to evaluate climate models. Homogeneous dynamic Bayesian network models are constructed for time series of empirical indices diagnosing the activity of major tropical, Northern and Southern Hemisphere modes of climate variability in the NCEP/NCAR and JRA‐55 reanalyses. The resulting probabilistic graphical models are comparable to Granger causal analyses that have recently been advocated. Reversible jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo is employed to provide a quantification of the uncertainty associated with the selection of a single network structure. In general, the models fitted from the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis and the JRA‐55 reanalysis are found to exhibit broad agreement in terms of associations for which there is high posterior confidence. Differences between the two reanalyses are found that involve modes for which known biases are present or that may be attributed to seasonal effects, as well as for features that, while present in point estimates, have low overall posterior mass. We argue that the ability to incorporate such measures of confidence in structural features is a significant advantage provided by the Bayesian approach, as point estimates alone may understate the relevant uncertainties and yield less informative measures of differences between products when network‐based approaches are used for model evaluation.
format article
author Dylan Harries
Terence J. O'Kane
author_facet Dylan Harries
Terence J. O'Kane
author_sort Dylan Harries
title Dynamic Bayesian Networks for Evaluation of Granger Causal Relationships in Climate Reanalyses
title_short Dynamic Bayesian Networks for Evaluation of Granger Causal Relationships in Climate Reanalyses
title_full Dynamic Bayesian Networks for Evaluation of Granger Causal Relationships in Climate Reanalyses
title_fullStr Dynamic Bayesian Networks for Evaluation of Granger Causal Relationships in Climate Reanalyses
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic Bayesian Networks for Evaluation of Granger Causal Relationships in Climate Reanalyses
title_sort dynamic bayesian networks for evaluation of granger causal relationships in climate reanalyses
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/720c584245b34176b886e6888ef0141d
work_keys_str_mv AT dylanharries dynamicbayesiannetworksforevaluationofgrangercausalrelationshipsinclimatereanalyses
AT terencejokane dynamicbayesiannetworksforevaluationofgrangercausalrelationshipsinclimatereanalyses
_version_ 1718415803204763648