Next-generation sequence analysis of cancer xenograft models.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) studies in cancer are limited by the amount, quality and purity of tissue samples. In this situation, primary xenografts have proven useful preclinical models. However, the presence of mouse-derived stromal cells represents a technical challenge to their use in NGS s...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fernando J Rossello, Richard W Tothill, Kara Britt, Kieren D Marini, Jeanette Falzon, David M Thomas, Craig D Peacock, Luigi Marchionni, Jason Li, Samara Bennett, Erwin Tantoso, Tracey Brown, Philip Chan, Luciano G Martelotto, D Neil Watkins
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/728a70be11b74d5e9bfec58d72aeeeed
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:728a70be11b74d5e9bfec58d72aeeeed
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:728a70be11b74d5e9bfec58d72aeeeed2021-11-18T08:53:35ZNext-generation sequence analysis of cancer xenograft models.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0074432https://doaj.org/article/728a70be11b74d5e9bfec58d72aeeeed2013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24086345/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Next-generation sequencing (NGS) studies in cancer are limited by the amount, quality and purity of tissue samples. In this situation, primary xenografts have proven useful preclinical models. However, the presence of mouse-derived stromal cells represents a technical challenge to their use in NGS studies. We examined this problem in an established primary xenograft model of small cell lung cancer (SCLC), a malignancy often diagnosed from small biopsy or needle aspirate samples. Using an in silico strategy that assign reads according to species-of-origin, we prospectively compared NGS data from primary xenograft models with matched cell lines and with published datasets. We show here that low-coverage whole-genome analysis demonstrated remarkable concordance between published genome data and internal controls, despite the presence of mouse genomic DNA. Exome capture sequencing revealed that this enrichment procedure was highly species-specific, with less than 4% of reads aligning to the mouse genome. Human-specific expression profiling with RNA-Seq replicated array-based gene expression experiments, whereas mouse-specific transcript profiles correlated with published datasets from human cancer stroma. We conclude that primary xenografts represent a useful platform for complex NGS analysis in cancer research for tumours with limited sample resources, or those with prominent stromal cell populations.Fernando J RosselloRichard W TothillKara BrittKieren D MariniJeanette FalzonDavid M ThomasCraig D PeacockLuigi MarchionniJason LiSamara BennettErwin TantosoTracey BrownPhilip ChanLuciano G MartelottoD Neil WatkinsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 9, p e74432 (2013)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Fernando J Rossello
Richard W Tothill
Kara Britt
Kieren D Marini
Jeanette Falzon
David M Thomas
Craig D Peacock
Luigi Marchionni
Jason Li
Samara Bennett
Erwin Tantoso
Tracey Brown
Philip Chan
Luciano G Martelotto
D Neil Watkins
Next-generation sequence analysis of cancer xenograft models.
description Next-generation sequencing (NGS) studies in cancer are limited by the amount, quality and purity of tissue samples. In this situation, primary xenografts have proven useful preclinical models. However, the presence of mouse-derived stromal cells represents a technical challenge to their use in NGS studies. We examined this problem in an established primary xenograft model of small cell lung cancer (SCLC), a malignancy often diagnosed from small biopsy or needle aspirate samples. Using an in silico strategy that assign reads according to species-of-origin, we prospectively compared NGS data from primary xenograft models with matched cell lines and with published datasets. We show here that low-coverage whole-genome analysis demonstrated remarkable concordance between published genome data and internal controls, despite the presence of mouse genomic DNA. Exome capture sequencing revealed that this enrichment procedure was highly species-specific, with less than 4% of reads aligning to the mouse genome. Human-specific expression profiling with RNA-Seq replicated array-based gene expression experiments, whereas mouse-specific transcript profiles correlated with published datasets from human cancer stroma. We conclude that primary xenografts represent a useful platform for complex NGS analysis in cancer research for tumours with limited sample resources, or those with prominent stromal cell populations.
format article
author Fernando J Rossello
Richard W Tothill
Kara Britt
Kieren D Marini
Jeanette Falzon
David M Thomas
Craig D Peacock
Luigi Marchionni
Jason Li
Samara Bennett
Erwin Tantoso
Tracey Brown
Philip Chan
Luciano G Martelotto
D Neil Watkins
author_facet Fernando J Rossello
Richard W Tothill
Kara Britt
Kieren D Marini
Jeanette Falzon
David M Thomas
Craig D Peacock
Luigi Marchionni
Jason Li
Samara Bennett
Erwin Tantoso
Tracey Brown
Philip Chan
Luciano G Martelotto
D Neil Watkins
author_sort Fernando J Rossello
title Next-generation sequence analysis of cancer xenograft models.
title_short Next-generation sequence analysis of cancer xenograft models.
title_full Next-generation sequence analysis of cancer xenograft models.
title_fullStr Next-generation sequence analysis of cancer xenograft models.
title_full_unstemmed Next-generation sequence analysis of cancer xenograft models.
title_sort next-generation sequence analysis of cancer xenograft models.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/728a70be11b74d5e9bfec58d72aeeeed
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandojrossello nextgenerationsequenceanalysisofcancerxenograftmodels
AT richardwtothill nextgenerationsequenceanalysisofcancerxenograftmodels
AT karabritt nextgenerationsequenceanalysisofcancerxenograftmodels
AT kierendmarini nextgenerationsequenceanalysisofcancerxenograftmodels
AT jeanettefalzon nextgenerationsequenceanalysisofcancerxenograftmodels
AT davidmthomas nextgenerationsequenceanalysisofcancerxenograftmodels
AT craigdpeacock nextgenerationsequenceanalysisofcancerxenograftmodels
AT luigimarchionni nextgenerationsequenceanalysisofcancerxenograftmodels
AT jasonli nextgenerationsequenceanalysisofcancerxenograftmodels
AT samarabennett nextgenerationsequenceanalysisofcancerxenograftmodels
AT erwintantoso nextgenerationsequenceanalysisofcancerxenograftmodels
AT traceybrown nextgenerationsequenceanalysisofcancerxenograftmodels
AT philipchan nextgenerationsequenceanalysisofcancerxenograftmodels
AT lucianogmartelotto nextgenerationsequenceanalysisofcancerxenograftmodels
AT dneilwatkins nextgenerationsequenceanalysisofcancerxenograftmodels
_version_ 1718421208176787456