Schelling, Cavell, and the Truth of Skepticism

This paper argues that (1) McDowell wrongly assumes that “terror”, Cavell’s reaction to the radical contingency of our shared modes of knowing or our “attunement”, expresses a skepticism that is antinomically bound to an equally unacceptable dogmatism because (2) Cavell rather regards terror as a m...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: G. Anthony Bruno
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MULPress 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7c57a7268fc64c21bd7c6e7fe3569452
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!