Schelling, Cavell, and the Truth of Skepticism
This paper argues that (1) McDowell wrongly assumes that “terror”, Cavell’s reaction to the radical contingency of our shared modes of knowing or our “attunement”, expresses a skepticism that is antinomically bound to an equally unacceptable dogmatism because (2) Cavell rather regards terror as a m...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
MULPress
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/7c57a7268fc64c21bd7c6e7fe3569452 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:7c57a7268fc64c21bd7c6e7fe3569452 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:7c57a7268fc64c21bd7c6e7fe35694522021-11-07T13:00:14ZSchelling, Cavell, and the Truth of Skepticism10.15173/jhap.v9i9.49192159-0303https://doaj.org/article/7c57a7268fc64c21bd7c6e7fe35694522021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jhaponline.org/jhap/article/view/4919https://doaj.org/toc/2159-0303 This paper argues that (1) McDowell wrongly assumes that “terror”, Cavell’s reaction to the radical contingency of our shared modes of knowing or our “attunement”, expresses a skepticism that is antinomically bound to an equally unacceptable dogmatism because (2) Cavell rather regards terror as a mood that reveals the “truth of skepticism”, namely, that there is no conclusive evidence for necessary attunement on pain of a category error, and that (3) a precedent for McDowell’s misunderstanding is Hegel’s argument for necessary attunement in a system of knowing, whose refutation Schelling holds it is the “merit of skepticism” to provide. G. Anthony BrunoMULPressarticlePhilosophy (General)B1-5802ENJournal for the History of Analytical Philosophy, Vol 9, Iss 9 (2021) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN |
| topic |
Philosophy (General) B1-5802 |
| spellingShingle |
Philosophy (General) B1-5802 G. Anthony Bruno Schelling, Cavell, and the Truth of Skepticism |
| description |
This paper argues that (1) McDowell wrongly assumes that “terror”, Cavell’s reaction to the radical contingency of our shared modes of knowing or our “attunement”, expresses a skepticism that is antinomically bound to an equally unacceptable dogmatism because (2) Cavell rather regards terror as a mood that reveals the “truth of skepticism”, namely, that there is no conclusive evidence for necessary attunement on pain of a category error, and that (3) a precedent for McDowell’s misunderstanding is Hegel’s argument for necessary attunement in a system of knowing, whose refutation Schelling holds it is the “merit of skepticism” to provide.
|
| format |
article |
| author |
G. Anthony Bruno |
| author_facet |
G. Anthony Bruno |
| author_sort |
G. Anthony Bruno |
| title |
Schelling, Cavell, and the Truth of Skepticism |
| title_short |
Schelling, Cavell, and the Truth of Skepticism |
| title_full |
Schelling, Cavell, and the Truth of Skepticism |
| title_fullStr |
Schelling, Cavell, and the Truth of Skepticism |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Schelling, Cavell, and the Truth of Skepticism |
| title_sort |
schelling, cavell, and the truth of skepticism |
| publisher |
MULPress |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/7c57a7268fc64c21bd7c6e7fe3569452 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT ganthonybruno schellingcavellandthetruthofskepticism |
| _version_ |
1718443497797713920 |