Factitivity presupposition and the relativised predicate in Krio

After a brief review of the literature on factivity and presupposition, the paper examines a case of asymmetry in the interpretation of a construction known as the relativised predicate (RP). Whenever the main verb of the sentence with RP is mek (= 'make'), the sentence may be interpreted...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dudley K. Nylander
Format: article
Language:EN
FR
Published: LibraryPress@UF 1985
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doaj.org/article/7caae8b146f84bccbad71f00a1cf70b4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:After a brief review of the literature on factivity and presupposition, the paper examines a case of asymmetry in the interpretation of a construction known as the relativised predicate (RP). Whenever the main verb of the sentence with RP is mek (= 'make'), the sentence may be interpreted in two ways, including one with "the fact that". However, if the matrix verb is other than mek, there is only one interpretation possible-without "the fact that". It is concluded that the dual interpretation is possible because the relative particle (which is also a complementizer linked to factive verbs) associates with the factive mek.