Mechanistically informed non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial

Abstract Background Induction of long-term synaptic depression (LTD) is proposed as a treatment mechanism for chronic pain but remains untested in clinical populations. Two interlinked studies; (1) A patient-assessor blinded, randomised, sham-controlled clinical trial and (2) an open-label mechanist...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Selina Johnson, Anne Marshall, Dyfrig Hughes, Emily Holmes, Florian Henrich, Turo Nurmikko, Manohar Sharma, Bernhard Frank, Paul Bassett, Andrew Marshall, Walter Magerl, Andreas Goebel
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/86be584b4caf43d598f28508c0bc0b20
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:86be584b4caf43d598f28508c0bc0b20
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:86be584b4caf43d598f28508c0bc0b202021-11-07T12:08:23ZMechanistically informed non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial10.1186/s12967-021-03128-21479-5876https://doaj.org/article/86be584b4caf43d598f28508c0bc0b202021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-03128-2https://doaj.org/toc/1479-5876Abstract Background Induction of long-term synaptic depression (LTD) is proposed as a treatment mechanism for chronic pain but remains untested in clinical populations. Two interlinked studies; (1) A patient-assessor blinded, randomised, sham-controlled clinical trial and (2) an open-label mechanistic study, sought to examine therapeutic LTD for persons with chronic peripheral nerve injury pain. Methods (1) Patients were randomised using a concealed, computer-generated schedule to either active or sham non-invasive low-frequency nerve stimulation (LFS), for 3 months (minimum 10 min/day). The primary outcome was average pain intensity (0–10 Likert scale) recorded over 1 week, at 3 months, compared between study groups. (2) On trial completion, consenting subjects entered a mechanistic study assessing somatosensory changes in response to LFS. Results (1) 76 patients were randomised (38 per group), with 65 (31 active, 34 sham) included in the intention to treat analysis. The primary outcome was not significant, pain scores were 0.3 units lower in active group (95% CI − 1.0, 0.3; p = 0.30) giving an effect size of 0.19 (Cohen’s D). Two non-device related serious adverse events were reported. (2) In the mechanistic study (n = 19) primary outcomes of mechanical pain sensitivity (p = 0.006) and dynamic mechanical allodynia (p = 0.043) significantly improved indicating reduced mechanical hyperalgesia. Conclusions Results from the RCT failed to reach significance. Results from the mechanistic study provide new evidence for effective induction of LTD in a clinical population. Taken together results add to mechanistic understanding of LTD and help inform future study design and approaches to treatment. Trial registration ISRCTN53432663.Selina JohnsonAnne MarshallDyfrig HughesEmily HolmesFlorian HenrichTuro NurmikkoManohar SharmaBernhard FrankPaul BassettAndrew MarshallWalter MagerlAndreas GoebelBMCarticlePeripheral nerve stimulationPeripheral neuropathic painLong term depressionChronic painLow frequencyMedicineRENJournal of Translational Medicine, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-15 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Peripheral nerve stimulation
Peripheral neuropathic pain
Long term depression
Chronic pain
Low frequency
Medicine
R
spellingShingle Peripheral nerve stimulation
Peripheral neuropathic pain
Long term depression
Chronic pain
Low frequency
Medicine
R
Selina Johnson
Anne Marshall
Dyfrig Hughes
Emily Holmes
Florian Henrich
Turo Nurmikko
Manohar Sharma
Bernhard Frank
Paul Bassett
Andrew Marshall
Walter Magerl
Andreas Goebel
Mechanistically informed non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial
description Abstract Background Induction of long-term synaptic depression (LTD) is proposed as a treatment mechanism for chronic pain but remains untested in clinical populations. Two interlinked studies; (1) A patient-assessor blinded, randomised, sham-controlled clinical trial and (2) an open-label mechanistic study, sought to examine therapeutic LTD for persons with chronic peripheral nerve injury pain. Methods (1) Patients were randomised using a concealed, computer-generated schedule to either active or sham non-invasive low-frequency nerve stimulation (LFS), for 3 months (minimum 10 min/day). The primary outcome was average pain intensity (0–10 Likert scale) recorded over 1 week, at 3 months, compared between study groups. (2) On trial completion, consenting subjects entered a mechanistic study assessing somatosensory changes in response to LFS. Results (1) 76 patients were randomised (38 per group), with 65 (31 active, 34 sham) included in the intention to treat analysis. The primary outcome was not significant, pain scores were 0.3 units lower in active group (95% CI − 1.0, 0.3; p = 0.30) giving an effect size of 0.19 (Cohen’s D). Two non-device related serious adverse events were reported. (2) In the mechanistic study (n = 19) primary outcomes of mechanical pain sensitivity (p = 0.006) and dynamic mechanical allodynia (p = 0.043) significantly improved indicating reduced mechanical hyperalgesia. Conclusions Results from the RCT failed to reach significance. Results from the mechanistic study provide new evidence for effective induction of LTD in a clinical population. Taken together results add to mechanistic understanding of LTD and help inform future study design and approaches to treatment. Trial registration ISRCTN53432663.
format article
author Selina Johnson
Anne Marshall
Dyfrig Hughes
Emily Holmes
Florian Henrich
Turo Nurmikko
Manohar Sharma
Bernhard Frank
Paul Bassett
Andrew Marshall
Walter Magerl
Andreas Goebel
author_facet Selina Johnson
Anne Marshall
Dyfrig Hughes
Emily Holmes
Florian Henrich
Turo Nurmikko
Manohar Sharma
Bernhard Frank
Paul Bassett
Andrew Marshall
Walter Magerl
Andreas Goebel
author_sort Selina Johnson
title Mechanistically informed non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial
title_short Mechanistically informed non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial
title_full Mechanistically informed non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial
title_fullStr Mechanistically informed non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Mechanistically informed non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial
title_sort mechanistically informed non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/86be584b4caf43d598f28508c0bc0b20
work_keys_str_mv AT selinajohnson mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT annemarshall mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT dyfrighughes mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT emilyholmes mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT florianhenrich mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT turonurmikko mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT manoharsharma mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT bernhardfrank mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT paulbassett mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT andrewmarshall mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT waltermagerl mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT andreasgoebel mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1718443558832177152