Applying a mathematical sense-making framework to student work and its potential for curriculum design

This paper extends prior work establishing an operationalized framework of mathematical sense making (MSM) in physics. The framework differentiates between the object being understood (either physical or mathematical) and various tools (physical or mathematical) used to mediate the sense-making proc...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Julian D. Gifford, Noah D. Finkelstein
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: American Physical Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8a27a8bf74cb4c8ba4bc33cb2adfff0e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8a27a8bf74cb4c8ba4bc33cb2adfff0e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8a27a8bf74cb4c8ba4bc33cb2adfff0e2021-12-02T14:57:16ZApplying a mathematical sense-making framework to student work and its potential for curriculum design10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.0101382469-9896https://doaj.org/article/8a27a8bf74cb4c8ba4bc33cb2adfff0e2021-05-01T00:00:00Zhttp://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010138http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010138https://doaj.org/toc/2469-9896This paper extends prior work establishing an operationalized framework of mathematical sense making (MSM) in physics. The framework differentiates between the object being understood (either physical or mathematical) and various tools (physical or mathematical) used to mediate the sense-making process. This results in four modes of MSM that can be coordinated and linked in various ways. Here, the framework is applied to novel modalities of student written work (both short answer and multiple choice). In detailed studies of student reasoning about the photoelectric effect, we associate these MSM modes with particular multiple choice answers, and substantiate this association by linking both the MSM modes and multiple choice answers with finer-grained reasoning elements that students use in solving a specific problem. Through the multiple associations between MSM mode, distributions of reasoning elements, and multiple-choice answers, we confirm the applicability of this framework to analyzing these sparser modalities of student work and its utility for analyzing larger-scale (N>100) datasets. The association between individual reasoning elements and both MSM modes and MC answers suggest that it is possible to cue particular modes of student reasoning and answer selection. Such findings suggest potential for this framework to be applicable to the analysis and design of curriculum.Julian D. GiffordNoah D. FinkelsteinAmerican Physical SocietyarticleSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691PhysicsQC1-999ENPhysical Review Physics Education Research, Vol 17, Iss 1, p 010138 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Physics
QC1-999
spellingShingle Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Physics
QC1-999
Julian D. Gifford
Noah D. Finkelstein
Applying a mathematical sense-making framework to student work and its potential for curriculum design
description This paper extends prior work establishing an operationalized framework of mathematical sense making (MSM) in physics. The framework differentiates between the object being understood (either physical or mathematical) and various tools (physical or mathematical) used to mediate the sense-making process. This results in four modes of MSM that can be coordinated and linked in various ways. Here, the framework is applied to novel modalities of student written work (both short answer and multiple choice). In detailed studies of student reasoning about the photoelectric effect, we associate these MSM modes with particular multiple choice answers, and substantiate this association by linking both the MSM modes and multiple choice answers with finer-grained reasoning elements that students use in solving a specific problem. Through the multiple associations between MSM mode, distributions of reasoning elements, and multiple-choice answers, we confirm the applicability of this framework to analyzing these sparser modalities of student work and its utility for analyzing larger-scale (N>100) datasets. The association between individual reasoning elements and both MSM modes and MC answers suggest that it is possible to cue particular modes of student reasoning and answer selection. Such findings suggest potential for this framework to be applicable to the analysis and design of curriculum.
format article
author Julian D. Gifford
Noah D. Finkelstein
author_facet Julian D. Gifford
Noah D. Finkelstein
author_sort Julian D. Gifford
title Applying a mathematical sense-making framework to student work and its potential for curriculum design
title_short Applying a mathematical sense-making framework to student work and its potential for curriculum design
title_full Applying a mathematical sense-making framework to student work and its potential for curriculum design
title_fullStr Applying a mathematical sense-making framework to student work and its potential for curriculum design
title_full_unstemmed Applying a mathematical sense-making framework to student work and its potential for curriculum design
title_sort applying a mathematical sense-making framework to student work and its potential for curriculum design
publisher American Physical Society
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/8a27a8bf74cb4c8ba4bc33cb2adfff0e
work_keys_str_mv AT juliandgifford applyingamathematicalsensemakingframeworktostudentworkanditspotentialforcurriculumdesign
AT noahdfinkelstein applyingamathematicalsensemakingframeworktostudentworkanditspotentialforcurriculumdesign
_version_ 1718389335178346496