ARGUMENTASI ILMIAH DAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS MELALUI METODE DEBAT

SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION AND CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS TROUGH DEBATE METHODS Abstract Lack of self-confidence and weak student reasoning in biology learning are related to scientific argumentation skills and critical thinking skills. This study aims to examine scientific argumentation and critical...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Suraya Suraya, Anandita Eka Setiadi, Nuri Dewi Muldayanti
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN ID
Publicado:	Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta 2019
Materias:	scientific argumentation skills critical thinking skills debate. Science (General) Q1-390
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/8d62ef58e7dc41c5982c0d1ed4852a56
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:8d62ef58e7dc41c5982c0d1ed4852a56
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:8d62ef58e7dc41c5982c0d1ed4852a562021-12-01T10:42:51ZARGUMENTASI ILMIAH DAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS MELALUI METODE DEBAT1979-72812443-128110.15408/es.v11i2.10479https://doaj.org/article/8d62ef58e7dc41c5982c0d1ed4852a562019-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/edusains/article/view/10479https://doaj.org/toc/1979-7281https://doaj.org/toc/2443-1281SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION AND CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS TROUGH DEBATE METHODS Abstract Lack of self-confidence and weak student reasoning in biology learning are related to scientific argumentation skills and critical thinking skills. This study aims to examine scientific argumentation and critical thinking skills of class X students in MAN 1 Natuna through debate methods on biodiversity material. This study uses a qualitative approach with descriptive methods. Data collection using observation, interviews, and documentation. Assessment of scientific argumentation and critical thinking was done oral and written. Scientific argumentation skills refer to Toulmin's Argument Pattern (TAP) and critical thinking skills are categorized in Strong, Acceptable, Unacceptable, & Weak. The results showed that student' scientific argumentation skills were at levels 2, 3, and 4. None of the students were at levels 1 and 5. Students' critical thinking skills were in the Unacceptable (62.06%) and Acceptable (37.94% ) category. Scientific arguments and critical thinking of class X students at MAN 1 Natuna are low. Abstrak Kurangnya kepercayaan diri serta lemahnya penalaran siswa pada pembelajaran biologi berkaitan dengan keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah dan keterampilan berpikir kritis. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah dan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa kelas X di MAN 1 Natuna melalui metode debat pada materi keanekaragaman hayati. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode deskriptif. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan observasi, wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Penilaian keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah dan berpikir kritis dilakukan secara lisan & tulisan. Keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah siswa mengacu pada Toulmin’s Argument Pattern (TAP), sedangkan keterampilan berpikir kritis dikategorikan dalam Strong, Acceptable, Unacceptable, & Weak. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah siswa berada pada level 2, 3, dan 4. Tidak ada satupun siswa yang berada pada level 1 dan 5. Keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa pada kategori Unacceptable (62.06%) dan Acceptable (37.94%). Argumentasi ilmiah dan berpikir kritis siswa kelas X di MAN 1 Natuna tergolong masih rendah.Suraya SurayaAnandita Eka SetiadiNuri Dewi MuldayantiUniversitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakartaarticlescientific argumentation skillscritical thinking skillsdebate.Science (General)Q1-390ENIDEDUSAINS, Vol 11, Iss 2, Pp 233-241 (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN ID
topic	scientific argumentation skills critical thinking skills debate. Science (General) Q1-390
spellingShingle	scientific argumentation skills critical thinking skills debate. Science (General) Q1-390 Suraya Suraya Anandita Eka Setiadi Nuri Dewi Muldayanti ARGUMENTASI ILMIAH DAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS MELALUI METODE DEBAT
description	SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION AND CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS TROUGH DEBATE METHODS Abstract Lack of self-confidence and weak student reasoning in biology learning are related to scientific argumentation skills and critical thinking skills. This study aims to examine scientific argumentation and critical thinking skills of class X students in MAN 1 Natuna through debate methods on biodiversity material. This study uses a qualitative approach with descriptive methods. Data collection using observation, interviews, and documentation. Assessment of scientific argumentation and critical thinking was done oral and written. Scientific argumentation skills refer to Toulmin's Argument Pattern (TAP) and critical thinking skills are categorized in Strong, Acceptable, Unacceptable, & Weak. The results showed that student' scientific argumentation skills were at levels 2, 3, and 4. None of the students were at levels 1 and 5. Students' critical thinking skills were in the Unacceptable (62.06%) and Acceptable (37.94% ) category. Scientific arguments and critical thinking of class X students at MAN 1 Natuna are low. Abstrak Kurangnya kepercayaan diri serta lemahnya penalaran siswa pada pembelajaran biologi berkaitan dengan keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah dan keterampilan berpikir kritis. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah dan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa kelas X di MAN 1 Natuna melalui metode debat pada materi keanekaragaman hayati. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode deskriptif. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan observasi, wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Penilaian keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah dan berpikir kritis dilakukan secara lisan & tulisan. Keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah siswa mengacu pada Toulmin’s Argument Pattern (TAP), sedangkan keterampilan berpikir kritis dikategorikan dalam Strong, Acceptable, Unacceptable, & Weak. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah siswa berada pada level 2, 3, dan 4. Tidak ada satupun siswa yang berada pada level 1 dan 5. Keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa pada kategori Unacceptable (62.06%) dan Acceptable (37.94%). Argumentasi ilmiah dan berpikir kritis siswa kelas X di MAN 1 Natuna tergolong masih rendah.
format	article
author	Suraya Suraya Anandita Eka Setiadi Nuri Dewi Muldayanti
author_facet	Suraya Suraya Anandita Eka Setiadi Nuri Dewi Muldayanti
author_sort	Suraya Suraya
title	ARGUMENTASI ILMIAH DAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS MELALUI METODE DEBAT
title_short	ARGUMENTASI ILMIAH DAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS MELALUI METODE DEBAT
title_full	ARGUMENTASI ILMIAH DAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS MELALUI METODE DEBAT
title_fullStr	ARGUMENTASI ILMIAH DAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS MELALUI METODE DEBAT
title_full_unstemmed	ARGUMENTASI ILMIAH DAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS MELALUI METODE DEBAT
title_sort	argumentasi ilmiah dan keterampilan berpikir kritis melalui metode debat
publisher	Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
publishDate	2019
url	https://doaj.org/article/8d62ef58e7dc41c5982c0d1ed4852a56
work_keys_str_mv	AT surayasuraya argumentasiilmiahdanketerampilanberpikirkritismelaluimetodedebat AT ananditaekasetiadi argumentasiilmiahdanketerampilanberpikirkritismelaluimetodedebat AT nuridewimuldayanti argumentasiilmiahdanketerampilanberpikirkritismelaluimetodedebat
_version_	1718405243488698368

ARGUMENTASI ILMIAH DAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS MELALUI METODE DEBAT

Ejemplares similares