Enhancing Scientific Literacy in the Undergraduate Cell Biology Laboratory Classroom

This paper describes the implementation of the Scientific Literacy in Cell Biology (SLCB) curriculum in an undergraduate biology laboratory course. The SLCB curriculum incorporated the reading and discussion of primary literature into hands-on and collaborative practical experiences. It was implemen...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hadiya Woodham, Gili Marbach-Ad, Gretchen Downey, Erika Tomei, Katerina Thompson
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8ef8e14b7d0642eda8369e89df45d76f
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8ef8e14b7d0642eda8369e89df45d76f
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8ef8e14b7d0642eda8369e89df45d76f2021-11-15T15:13:57ZEnhancing Scientific Literacy in the Undergraduate Cell Biology Laboratory Classroom10.1128/jmbe.v17i3.11621935-78851935-7877https://doaj.org/article/8ef8e14b7d0642eda8369e89df45d76f2016-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jmbe.v17i3.1162https://doaj.org/toc/1935-7877https://doaj.org/toc/1935-7885This paper describes the implementation of the Scientific Literacy in Cell Biology (SLCB) curriculum in an undergraduate biology laboratory course. The SLCB curriculum incorporated the reading and discussion of primary literature into hands-on and collaborative practical experiences. It was implemented in five stages over an 11-week period, during which students were also introduced to the theory and practice of common cell biology techniques. We report on the effectiveness of the course, as measured by pre- and post-course survey data probing students’ content knowledge and their level of familiarity, confidence, and experience with different skills pertaining to analyzing (reading, interpreting, and discussing) primary literature. In the spring 2015 semester, 287 (72%) of the 396 students who were enrolled in the laboratory completed both the pre- and post-course survey. The average score on the content questions of the post-course survey was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) than the average score on the pre-course survey. Students reported that they gained greater familiarity, experience, and confidence in the skills that were measured. Our findings may aid in reforming higher-education science laboratory courses to better promote writing, reading, data processing, and presentation skills. Journal of Microbiology & Biology EducationHadiya WoodhamGili Marbach-AdGretchen DowneyErika TomeiKaterina ThompsonAmerican Society for MicrobiologyarticleSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691Biology (General)QH301-705.5ENJournal of Microbiology & Biology Education, Vol 17, Iss 3, Pp 458-465 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
spellingShingle Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Hadiya Woodham
Gili Marbach-Ad
Gretchen Downey
Erika Tomei
Katerina Thompson
Enhancing Scientific Literacy in the Undergraduate Cell Biology Laboratory Classroom
description This paper describes the implementation of the Scientific Literacy in Cell Biology (SLCB) curriculum in an undergraduate biology laboratory course. The SLCB curriculum incorporated the reading and discussion of primary literature into hands-on and collaborative practical experiences. It was implemented in five stages over an 11-week period, during which students were also introduced to the theory and practice of common cell biology techniques. We report on the effectiveness of the course, as measured by pre- and post-course survey data probing students’ content knowledge and their level of familiarity, confidence, and experience with different skills pertaining to analyzing (reading, interpreting, and discussing) primary literature. In the spring 2015 semester, 287 (72%) of the 396 students who were enrolled in the laboratory completed both the pre- and post-course survey. The average score on the content questions of the post-course survey was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) than the average score on the pre-course survey. Students reported that they gained greater familiarity, experience, and confidence in the skills that were measured. Our findings may aid in reforming higher-education science laboratory courses to better promote writing, reading, data processing, and presentation skills. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
format article
author Hadiya Woodham
Gili Marbach-Ad
Gretchen Downey
Erika Tomei
Katerina Thompson
author_facet Hadiya Woodham
Gili Marbach-Ad
Gretchen Downey
Erika Tomei
Katerina Thompson
author_sort Hadiya Woodham
title Enhancing Scientific Literacy in the Undergraduate Cell Biology Laboratory Classroom
title_short Enhancing Scientific Literacy in the Undergraduate Cell Biology Laboratory Classroom
title_full Enhancing Scientific Literacy in the Undergraduate Cell Biology Laboratory Classroom
title_fullStr Enhancing Scientific Literacy in the Undergraduate Cell Biology Laboratory Classroom
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing Scientific Literacy in the Undergraduate Cell Biology Laboratory Classroom
title_sort enhancing scientific literacy in the undergraduate cell biology laboratory classroom
publisher American Society for Microbiology
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/8ef8e14b7d0642eda8369e89df45d76f
work_keys_str_mv AT hadiyawoodham enhancingscientificliteracyintheundergraduatecellbiologylaboratoryclassroom
AT gilimarbachad enhancingscientificliteracyintheundergraduatecellbiologylaboratoryclassroom
AT gretchendowney enhancingscientificliteracyintheundergraduatecellbiologylaboratoryclassroom
AT erikatomei enhancingscientificliteracyintheundergraduatecellbiologylaboratoryclassroom
AT katerinathompson enhancingscientificliteracyintheundergraduatecellbiologylaboratoryclassroom
_version_ 1718428203399249920