“Claim vs. Reality”—A German Case Study on Modes and Functions of Sports-Pedagogical Communication

Academic sports pedagogy continuously assures itself of its disciplinary foundations and determines its position in the structure of modern sciences. While communication is based on differences, the distinction between claim and reality plays a crucial role in sports pedagogy. However, the forms and...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	David Jaitner, Swen Koerner, Esther Serwe-Pandrick
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:	systems theory sports pedagogy Germany disciplinary identity claim and reality academic culture Sports GV557-1198.995
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/8ff4a6a2a9ad4be4ab435d85b7c483cd
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:8ff4a6a2a9ad4be4ab435d85b7c483cd
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:8ff4a6a2a9ad4be4ab435d85b7c483cd2021-11-30T18:05:59Z“Claim vs. Reality”—A German Case Study on Modes and Functions of Sports-Pedagogical Communication2624-936710.3389/fspor.2021.775322https://doaj.org/article/8ff4a6a2a9ad4be4ab435d85b7c483cd2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fspor.2021.775322/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2624-9367Academic sports pedagogy continuously assures itself of its disciplinary foundations and determines its position in the structure of modern sciences. While communication is based on differences, the distinction between claim and reality plays a crucial role in sports pedagogy. However, the forms and functions in which the distinction appears have not been more closely investigated in sports pedagogic. This article starts with this in mind, exemplarily focusing on academic sports pedagogy in Germany. While analyzing 212 scientific texts of sports-pedagogical provenance, three central variations of the distinction could be identified, which persist until today and are present in the discipline's central discussion lines: (1) hierarchical demarcation, (2) unsystematic approach, (3) direct synthesis. From a functional point of view, the distinction between claim and reality continuously (re)organizes the relationship of sports pedagogy to other scientific disciplines, educational policy guidelines, and school practice expectations, thus proving to be a supporting pillar of disciplinary identity work.David JaitnerSwen KoernerEsther Serwe-PandrickFrontiers Media S.A.articlesystems theorysports pedagogyGermanydisciplinary identityclaim and realityacademic cultureSportsGV557-1198.995ENFrontiers in Sports and Active Living, Vol 3 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	systems theory sports pedagogy Germany disciplinary identity claim and reality academic culture Sports GV557-1198.995
spellingShingle	systems theory sports pedagogy Germany disciplinary identity claim and reality academic culture Sports GV557-1198.995 David Jaitner Swen Koerner Esther Serwe-Pandrick “Claim vs. Reality”—A German Case Study on Modes and Functions of Sports-Pedagogical Communication
description	Academic sports pedagogy continuously assures itself of its disciplinary foundations and determines its position in the structure of modern sciences. While communication is based on differences, the distinction between claim and reality plays a crucial role in sports pedagogy. However, the forms and functions in which the distinction appears have not been more closely investigated in sports pedagogic. This article starts with this in mind, exemplarily focusing on academic sports pedagogy in Germany. While analyzing 212 scientific texts of sports-pedagogical provenance, three central variations of the distinction could be identified, which persist until today and are present in the discipline's central discussion lines: (1) hierarchical demarcation, (2) unsystematic approach, (3) direct synthesis. From a functional point of view, the distinction between claim and reality continuously (re)organizes the relationship of sports pedagogy to other scientific disciplines, educational policy guidelines, and school practice expectations, thus proving to be a supporting pillar of disciplinary identity work.
format	article
author	David Jaitner Swen Koerner Esther Serwe-Pandrick
author_facet	David Jaitner Swen Koerner Esther Serwe-Pandrick
author_sort	David Jaitner
title	“Claim vs. Reality”—A German Case Study on Modes and Functions of Sports-Pedagogical Communication
title_short	“Claim vs. Reality”—A German Case Study on Modes and Functions of Sports-Pedagogical Communication
title_full	“Claim vs. Reality”—A German Case Study on Modes and Functions of Sports-Pedagogical Communication
title_fullStr	“Claim vs. Reality”—A German Case Study on Modes and Functions of Sports-Pedagogical Communication
title_full_unstemmed	“Claim vs. Reality”—A German Case Study on Modes and Functions of Sports-Pedagogical Communication
title_sort	“claim vs. reality”—a german case study on modes and functions of sports-pedagogical communication
publisher	Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/8ff4a6a2a9ad4be4ab435d85b7c483cd
work_keys_str_mv	AT davidjaitner claimvsrealityagermancasestudyonmodesandfunctionsofsportspedagogicalcommunication AT swenkoerner claimvsrealityagermancasestudyonmodesandfunctionsofsportspedagogicalcommunication AT estherserwepandrick claimvsrealityagermancasestudyonmodesandfunctionsofsportspedagogicalcommunication
_version_	1718406393495552000

“Claim vs. Reality”—A German Case Study on Modes and Functions of Sports-Pedagogical Communication

Ejemplares similares