The role of response elements organization in transcription factor selectivity: the IFN-β enhanceosome example.

What is the mechanism through which transcription factors (TFs) assemble specifically along the enhancer DNA? The IFN-β enhanceosome provides a good model system: it is small; its components' crystal structures are available; and there are biochemical and cellular data. In the IFN-β enhanceosom...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yongping Pan, Ruth Nussinov
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/95d76da77b504d7cbae0c9da211536a4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:95d76da77b504d7cbae0c9da211536a4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:95d76da77b504d7cbae0c9da211536a42021-11-18T05:50:29ZThe role of response elements organization in transcription factor selectivity: the IFN-β enhanceosome example.1553-734X1553-735810.1371/journal.pcbi.1002077https://doaj.org/article/95d76da77b504d7cbae0c9da211536a42011-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/21698143/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1553-734Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/1553-7358What is the mechanism through which transcription factors (TFs) assemble specifically along the enhancer DNA? The IFN-β enhanceosome provides a good model system: it is small; its components' crystal structures are available; and there are biochemical and cellular data. In the IFN-β enhanceosome, there are few protein-protein interactions even though consecutive DNA response elements (REs) overlap. Our molecular dynamics (MD) simulations on different motif combinations from the enhanceosome illustrate that cooperativity is achieved via unique organization of the REs: specific binding of one TF can enhance the binding of another TF to a neighboring RE and restrict others, through overlap of REs; the order of the REs can determine which complexes will form; and the alternation of consensus and non-consensus REs can regulate binding specificity by optimizing the interactions among partners. Our observations offer an explanation of how specificity and cooperativity can be attained despite the limited interactions between neighboring TFs on the enhancer DNA. To date, when addressing selective TF binding, attention has largely focused on RE sequences. Yet, the order of the REs on the DNA and the length of the spacers between them can be a key factor in specific combinatorial assembly of the TFs on the enhancer and thus in function. Our results emphasize cooperativity via RE binding sites organization.Yongping PanRuth NussinovPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleBiology (General)QH301-705.5ENPLoS Computational Biology, Vol 7, Iss 6, p e1002077 (2011)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
spellingShingle Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Yongping Pan
Ruth Nussinov
The role of response elements organization in transcription factor selectivity: the IFN-β enhanceosome example.
description What is the mechanism through which transcription factors (TFs) assemble specifically along the enhancer DNA? The IFN-β enhanceosome provides a good model system: it is small; its components' crystal structures are available; and there are biochemical and cellular data. In the IFN-β enhanceosome, there are few protein-protein interactions even though consecutive DNA response elements (REs) overlap. Our molecular dynamics (MD) simulations on different motif combinations from the enhanceosome illustrate that cooperativity is achieved via unique organization of the REs: specific binding of one TF can enhance the binding of another TF to a neighboring RE and restrict others, through overlap of REs; the order of the REs can determine which complexes will form; and the alternation of consensus and non-consensus REs can regulate binding specificity by optimizing the interactions among partners. Our observations offer an explanation of how specificity and cooperativity can be attained despite the limited interactions between neighboring TFs on the enhancer DNA. To date, when addressing selective TF binding, attention has largely focused on RE sequences. Yet, the order of the REs on the DNA and the length of the spacers between them can be a key factor in specific combinatorial assembly of the TFs on the enhancer and thus in function. Our results emphasize cooperativity via RE binding sites organization.
format article
author Yongping Pan
Ruth Nussinov
author_facet Yongping Pan
Ruth Nussinov
author_sort Yongping Pan
title The role of response elements organization in transcription factor selectivity: the IFN-β enhanceosome example.
title_short The role of response elements organization in transcription factor selectivity: the IFN-β enhanceosome example.
title_full The role of response elements organization in transcription factor selectivity: the IFN-β enhanceosome example.
title_fullStr The role of response elements organization in transcription factor selectivity: the IFN-β enhanceosome example.
title_full_unstemmed The role of response elements organization in transcription factor selectivity: the IFN-β enhanceosome example.
title_sort role of response elements organization in transcription factor selectivity: the ifn-β enhanceosome example.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2011
url https://doaj.org/article/95d76da77b504d7cbae0c9da211536a4
work_keys_str_mv AT yongpingpan theroleofresponseelementsorganizationintranscriptionfactorselectivitytheifnbenhanceosomeexample
AT ruthnussinov theroleofresponseelementsorganizationintranscriptionfactorselectivitytheifnbenhanceosomeexample
AT yongpingpan roleofresponseelementsorganizationintranscriptionfactorselectivitytheifnbenhanceosomeexample
AT ruthnussinov roleofresponseelementsorganizationintranscriptionfactorselectivitytheifnbenhanceosomeexample
_version_ 1718424801005010944