The Influence of Design and Technological Parameters on the MAF Process

Abstract  Experimental work from Magnetic Abrasive Finishing (MAF) tests was carried out design parameters (amplitude, and number of cycle which are formed the shape of electromagnetic pole), and technological parameters (current, cutting speed, working gap, and finishing time) all have an influ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Saad kariem Shather, Shakir M. Mousa
Format: article
Language:EN
Published: Al-Khwarizmi College of Engineering – University of Baghdad 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doaj.org/article/9636303f085442dd9890bd31f86d2815
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9636303f085442dd9890bd31f86d2815
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9636303f085442dd9890bd31f86d28152021-12-02T07:16:40ZThe Influence of Design and Technological Parameters on the MAF Process1818-11712312-0789https://doaj.org/article/9636303f085442dd9890bd31f86d28152015-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://alkej.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/alkej/article/view/267https://doaj.org/toc/1818-1171https://doaj.org/toc/2312-0789 Abstract  Experimental work from Magnetic Abrasive Finishing (MAF) tests was carried out design parameters (amplitude, and number of cycle which are formed the shape of electromagnetic pole), and technological parameters (current, cutting speed, working gap, and finishing time) all have an influence on the mechanical properties of the surface layer in MAF process. This research has made to study the effect of design and technological parameters on the surface roughness (Ra), micro hardness (Hv) and material removal (MR) in working zone. A set of experimental tests has been planned using response surface methodology according to Taguchi matrix (36) with three levels and six factors. The analysis of variance and instruction curves indicate some significant. X1; X4; X6 have a significant effect on the surface roughness Ra for steel, X2 has mildly significant, while X3 and X5 have insignificant effect. The results showed that roughness of workpiece decreased from 0.3 to 0.15 µm that means improved the roughness to 100%. Keywords: Design and technological parameters, micro-hardness, surface roughness, material of removal, MINITAB software. Saad kariem ShatherShakir M. MousaAl-Khwarizmi College of Engineering – University of BaghdadarticleDesign and technological parameters, micro-hardness, surface roughness, material of removal, MINITAB software.Chemical engineeringTP155-156Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040ENAl-Khawarizmi Engineering Journal, Vol 11, Iss 4 (2015)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Design and technological parameters, micro-hardness, surface roughness, material of removal, MINITAB software.
Chemical engineering
TP155-156
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
spellingShingle Design and technological parameters, micro-hardness, surface roughness, material of removal, MINITAB software.
Chemical engineering
TP155-156
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Saad kariem Shather
Shakir M. Mousa
The Influence of Design and Technological Parameters on the MAF Process
description Abstract  Experimental work from Magnetic Abrasive Finishing (MAF) tests was carried out design parameters (amplitude, and number of cycle which are formed the shape of electromagnetic pole), and technological parameters (current, cutting speed, working gap, and finishing time) all have an influence on the mechanical properties of the surface layer in MAF process. This research has made to study the effect of design and technological parameters on the surface roughness (Ra), micro hardness (Hv) and material removal (MR) in working zone. A set of experimental tests has been planned using response surface methodology according to Taguchi matrix (36) with three levels and six factors. The analysis of variance and instruction curves indicate some significant. X1; X4; X6 have a significant effect on the surface roughness Ra for steel, X2 has mildly significant, while X3 and X5 have insignificant effect. The results showed that roughness of workpiece decreased from 0.3 to 0.15 µm that means improved the roughness to 100%. Keywords: Design and technological parameters, micro-hardness, surface roughness, material of removal, MINITAB software.
format article
author Saad kariem Shather
Shakir M. Mousa
author_facet Saad kariem Shather
Shakir M. Mousa
author_sort Saad kariem Shather
title The Influence of Design and Technological Parameters on the MAF Process
title_short The Influence of Design and Technological Parameters on the MAF Process
title_full The Influence of Design and Technological Parameters on the MAF Process
title_fullStr The Influence of Design and Technological Parameters on the MAF Process
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Design and Technological Parameters on the MAF Process
title_sort influence of design and technological parameters on the maf process
publisher Al-Khwarizmi College of Engineering – University of Baghdad
publishDate 2015
url https://doaj.org/article/9636303f085442dd9890bd31f86d2815
work_keys_str_mv AT saadkariemshather theinfluenceofdesignandtechnologicalparametersonthemafprocess
AT shakirmmousa theinfluenceofdesignandtechnologicalparametersonthemafprocess
AT saadkariemshather influenceofdesignandtechnologicalparametersonthemafprocess
AT shakirmmousa influenceofdesignandtechnologicalparametersonthemafprocess
_version_ 1718399527795294208