Institutional level identity control strategies in the distance education environment: A survey of administrative staff

Physical separation of students and instructors creates the gap of anonymity and limited control over the remote learning environment. The ability of academic institutions to authenticate students and validate authorship of academic work at various points during a course is necessary for preserving...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Alexander Amigud
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Athabasca University Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/998b1679bf014254a99f639c6062a2e0
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:998b1679bf014254a99f639c6062a2e0
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:998b1679bf014254a99f639c6062a2e02021-12-02T19:20:43ZInstitutional level identity control strategies in the distance education environment: A survey of administrative staff10.19173/irrodl.v14i5.15411492-3831https://doaj.org/article/998b1679bf014254a99f639c6062a2e02013-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1541https://doaj.org/toc/1492-3831 Physical separation of students and instructors creates the gap of anonymity and limited control over the remote learning environment. The ability of academic institutions to authenticate students and validate authorship of academic work at various points during a course is necessary for preserving not only perceived credibility but also public safety. With the growing scope of distance education programs that permeate critical areas such as healthcare, airspace, water management, and food solutions, universities have a moral obligation to employ secure measures to verify learning outcomes. This study examines the measures universities with large distance education programs employ to align identity of learners with the academic work they do, as well as the effectiveness of and challenges and barriers to their implementation. The research was undertaken using a multiple case approach and examined survey responses from five academic administrators at five officially accredited post secondary institutions in three countries. The cases examined in the study include: Athabasca University, Open University UK, Penn State University World Campus, University of Maryland University College, and eConcordia,Concordia University's distance learning facility. This study is not an exhaustive attempt to examine all aspects of academic integrity, but rather to create awareness about various learner authentication strategies. This study confirms that secure learner authentication in the distance education environment is possible. However, with greater pressure to enhance security of learner authentication, the openness of open learning is challenged and may change as we know it. Alexander AmigudAthabasca University PressarticleAcademic IntegrityCheatingPlagiarism DetectionAccessibilityIdentity AssuranceSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691ENInternational Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Vol 14, Iss 5 (2013)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Academic Integrity
Cheating
Plagiarism Detection
Accessibility
Identity Assurance
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
spellingShingle Academic Integrity
Cheating
Plagiarism Detection
Accessibility
Identity Assurance
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Alexander Amigud
Institutional level identity control strategies in the distance education environment: A survey of administrative staff
description Physical separation of students and instructors creates the gap of anonymity and limited control over the remote learning environment. The ability of academic institutions to authenticate students and validate authorship of academic work at various points during a course is necessary for preserving not only perceived credibility but also public safety. With the growing scope of distance education programs that permeate critical areas such as healthcare, airspace, water management, and food solutions, universities have a moral obligation to employ secure measures to verify learning outcomes. This study examines the measures universities with large distance education programs employ to align identity of learners with the academic work they do, as well as the effectiveness of and challenges and barriers to their implementation. The research was undertaken using a multiple case approach and examined survey responses from five academic administrators at five officially accredited post secondary institutions in three countries. The cases examined in the study include: Athabasca University, Open University UK, Penn State University World Campus, University of Maryland University College, and eConcordia,Concordia University's distance learning facility. This study is not an exhaustive attempt to examine all aspects of academic integrity, but rather to create awareness about various learner authentication strategies. This study confirms that secure learner authentication in the distance education environment is possible. However, with greater pressure to enhance security of learner authentication, the openness of open learning is challenged and may change as we know it.
format article
author Alexander Amigud
author_facet Alexander Amigud
author_sort Alexander Amigud
title Institutional level identity control strategies in the distance education environment: A survey of administrative staff
title_short Institutional level identity control strategies in the distance education environment: A survey of administrative staff
title_full Institutional level identity control strategies in the distance education environment: A survey of administrative staff
title_fullStr Institutional level identity control strategies in the distance education environment: A survey of administrative staff
title_full_unstemmed Institutional level identity control strategies in the distance education environment: A survey of administrative staff
title_sort institutional level identity control strategies in the distance education environment: a survey of administrative staff
publisher Athabasca University Press
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/998b1679bf014254a99f639c6062a2e0
work_keys_str_mv AT alexanderamigud institutionallevelidentitycontrolstrategiesinthedistanceeducationenvironmentasurveyofadministrativestaff
_version_ 1718376809781788672