Learners' Perspectives on what is Missing from Online Learning: Interpretations through the Community of Inquiry Framework

Despite the success that instructors and learners often enjoy with online university courses, learners have also reported that they miss face-to-face contact when learning online. The purpose of this inquiry was to identify learners’ perceptions of what is missing from online learning and provide re...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Emma J. Stodel, Terrie Lynn Thompson, Colla J. MacDonald
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Athabasca University Press 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a1c80eaad66e473cbd21f88edbefa688
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a1c80eaad66e473cbd21f88edbefa688
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a1c80eaad66e473cbd21f88edbefa6882021-12-02T19:25:29ZLearners' Perspectives on what is Missing from Online Learning: Interpretations through the Community of Inquiry Framework10.19173/irrodl.v7i3.3251492-3831https://doaj.org/article/a1c80eaad66e473cbd21f88edbefa6882006-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/325https://doaj.org/toc/1492-3831Despite the success that instructors and learners often enjoy with online university courses, learners have also reported that they miss face-to-face contact when learning online. The purpose of this inquiry was to identify learners’ perceptions of what is missing from online learning and provide recommendations for how we can continue to innovate and improve the online learning experience. The inquiry was qualitative in nature and conducted from a constructivist perspective. Ten learners who had indicated that they missed and/or would have liked more face-to-face contact following their participation in an online course were interviewed to elicit responses that would provide insights into what it is they miss about face-to-face contact when learning online. Five themes emerged: robustness of online dialogue, spontaneity and improvisation, perceiving and being perceived by the other, getting to know others, and learning to be an online learner. Garrison and colleagues’ (Garrison, Anderson, & Archer, 2000) community of inquiry framework was used to interpret the findings.Emma J. StodelTerrie Lynn ThompsonColla J. MacDonaldAthabasca University PressarticleOnline learninglearners’ perspectivescommunity of inquiry frameworkcognitive presencesocial presenceteaching presenceSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691ENInternational Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Vol 7, Iss 3 (2006)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Online learning
learners’ perspectives
community of inquiry framework
cognitive presence
social presence
teaching presence
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
spellingShingle Online learning
learners’ perspectives
community of inquiry framework
cognitive presence
social presence
teaching presence
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Emma J. Stodel
Terrie Lynn Thompson
Colla J. MacDonald
Learners' Perspectives on what is Missing from Online Learning: Interpretations through the Community of Inquiry Framework
description Despite the success that instructors and learners often enjoy with online university courses, learners have also reported that they miss face-to-face contact when learning online. The purpose of this inquiry was to identify learners’ perceptions of what is missing from online learning and provide recommendations for how we can continue to innovate and improve the online learning experience. The inquiry was qualitative in nature and conducted from a constructivist perspective. Ten learners who had indicated that they missed and/or would have liked more face-to-face contact following their participation in an online course were interviewed to elicit responses that would provide insights into what it is they miss about face-to-face contact when learning online. Five themes emerged: robustness of online dialogue, spontaneity and improvisation, perceiving and being perceived by the other, getting to know others, and learning to be an online learner. Garrison and colleagues’ (Garrison, Anderson, & Archer, 2000) community of inquiry framework was used to interpret the findings.
format article
author Emma J. Stodel
Terrie Lynn Thompson
Colla J. MacDonald
author_facet Emma J. Stodel
Terrie Lynn Thompson
Colla J. MacDonald
author_sort Emma J. Stodel
title Learners' Perspectives on what is Missing from Online Learning: Interpretations through the Community of Inquiry Framework
title_short Learners' Perspectives on what is Missing from Online Learning: Interpretations through the Community of Inquiry Framework
title_full Learners' Perspectives on what is Missing from Online Learning: Interpretations through the Community of Inquiry Framework
title_fullStr Learners' Perspectives on what is Missing from Online Learning: Interpretations through the Community of Inquiry Framework
title_full_unstemmed Learners' Perspectives on what is Missing from Online Learning: Interpretations through the Community of Inquiry Framework
title_sort learners' perspectives on what is missing from online learning: interpretations through the community of inquiry framework
publisher Athabasca University Press
publishDate 2006
url https://doaj.org/article/a1c80eaad66e473cbd21f88edbefa688
work_keys_str_mv AT emmajstodel learnersperspectivesonwhatismissingfromonlinelearninginterpretationsthroughthecommunityofinquiryframework
AT terrielynnthompson learnersperspectivesonwhatismissingfromonlinelearninginterpretationsthroughthecommunityofinquiryframework
AT collajmacdonald learnersperspectivesonwhatismissingfromonlinelearninginterpretationsthroughthecommunityofinquiryframework
_version_ 1718376577903886336