Learners' Perspectives on what is Missing from Online Learning: Interpretations through the Community of Inquiry Framework
Despite the success that instructors and learners often enjoy with online university courses, learners have also reported that they miss face-to-face contact when learning online. The purpose of this inquiry was to identify learners’ perceptions of what is missing from online learning and provide re...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Athabasca University Press
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/a1c80eaad66e473cbd21f88edbefa688 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:a1c80eaad66e473cbd21f88edbefa688 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:a1c80eaad66e473cbd21f88edbefa6882021-12-02T19:25:29ZLearners' Perspectives on what is Missing from Online Learning: Interpretations through the Community of Inquiry Framework10.19173/irrodl.v7i3.3251492-3831https://doaj.org/article/a1c80eaad66e473cbd21f88edbefa6882006-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/325https://doaj.org/toc/1492-3831Despite the success that instructors and learners often enjoy with online university courses, learners have also reported that they miss face-to-face contact when learning online. The purpose of this inquiry was to identify learners’ perceptions of what is missing from online learning and provide recommendations for how we can continue to innovate and improve the online learning experience. The inquiry was qualitative in nature and conducted from a constructivist perspective. Ten learners who had indicated that they missed and/or would have liked more face-to-face contact following their participation in an online course were interviewed to elicit responses that would provide insights into what it is they miss about face-to-face contact when learning online. Five themes emerged: robustness of online dialogue, spontaneity and improvisation, perceiving and being perceived by the other, getting to know others, and learning to be an online learner. Garrison and colleagues’ (Garrison, Anderson, & Archer, 2000) community of inquiry framework was used to interpret the findings.Emma J. StodelTerrie Lynn ThompsonColla J. MacDonaldAthabasca University PressarticleOnline learninglearners’ perspectivescommunity of inquiry frameworkcognitive presencesocial presenceteaching presenceSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691ENInternational Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Vol 7, Iss 3 (2006) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Online learning learners’ perspectives community of inquiry framework cognitive presence social presence teaching presence Special aspects of education LC8-6691 |
spellingShingle |
Online learning learners’ perspectives community of inquiry framework cognitive presence social presence teaching presence Special aspects of education LC8-6691 Emma J. Stodel Terrie Lynn Thompson Colla J. MacDonald Learners' Perspectives on what is Missing from Online Learning: Interpretations through the Community of Inquiry Framework |
description |
Despite the success that instructors and learners often enjoy with online university courses, learners have also reported that they miss face-to-face contact when learning online. The purpose of this inquiry was to identify learners’ perceptions of what is missing from online learning and provide recommendations for how we can continue to innovate and improve the online learning experience. The inquiry was qualitative in nature and conducted from a constructivist perspective. Ten learners who had indicated that they missed and/or would have liked more face-to-face contact following their participation in an online course were interviewed to elicit responses that would provide insights into what it is they miss about face-to-face contact when learning online. Five themes emerged: robustness of online dialogue, spontaneity and improvisation, perceiving and being perceived by the other, getting to know others, and learning to be an online learner. Garrison and colleagues’ (Garrison, Anderson, & Archer, 2000) community of inquiry framework was used to interpret the findings. |
format |
article |
author |
Emma J. Stodel Terrie Lynn Thompson Colla J. MacDonald |
author_facet |
Emma J. Stodel Terrie Lynn Thompson Colla J. MacDonald |
author_sort |
Emma J. Stodel |
title |
Learners' Perspectives on what is Missing from Online Learning: Interpretations through the Community of Inquiry Framework |
title_short |
Learners' Perspectives on what is Missing from Online Learning: Interpretations through the Community of Inquiry Framework |
title_full |
Learners' Perspectives on what is Missing from Online Learning: Interpretations through the Community of Inquiry Framework |
title_fullStr |
Learners' Perspectives on what is Missing from Online Learning: Interpretations through the Community of Inquiry Framework |
title_full_unstemmed |
Learners' Perspectives on what is Missing from Online Learning: Interpretations through the Community of Inquiry Framework |
title_sort |
learners' perspectives on what is missing from online learning: interpretations through the community of inquiry framework |
publisher |
Athabasca University Press |
publishDate |
2006 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/a1c80eaad66e473cbd21f88edbefa688 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT emmajstodel learnersperspectivesonwhatismissingfromonlinelearninginterpretationsthroughthecommunityofinquiryframework AT terrielynnthompson learnersperspectivesonwhatismissingfromonlinelearninginterpretationsthroughthecommunityofinquiryframework AT collajmacdonald learnersperspectivesonwhatismissingfromonlinelearninginterpretationsthroughthecommunityofinquiryframework |
_version_ |
1718376577903886336 |