Cheating in online courses: Evidence from online proctoring
This study revives the unsettled debate on the extent of academic dishonesty in online courses. It takes advantage of a quasi experiment in which online proctoring using a webcam recording software was introduced for high-stakes exams in two online courses. Each course remained the same in its struc...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/aa3ab9a201f44c44854292da11561291 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:aa3ab9a201f44c44854292da11561291 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:aa3ab9a201f44c44854292da115612912021-12-01T05:03:29ZCheating in online courses: Evidence from online proctoring2451-958810.1016/j.chbr.2020.100033https://doaj.org/article/aa3ab9a201f44c44854292da115612912020-08-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958820300336https://doaj.org/toc/2451-9588This study revives the unsettled debate on the extent of academic dishonesty in online courses. It takes advantage of a quasi experiment in which online proctoring using a webcam recording software was introduced for high-stakes exams in two online courses. Each course remained the same in its structure, content and assessments before and after the introduction of online proctoring. Analysis of exam scores shows that online proctoring was associated with a decrease in average performance in both courses. Furthermore, the decrease in scores persists when accounting for potential confounding factors in a regression framework. Finally, in separate regressions of exam performance on student characteristics, the regression explanatory power was higher for scores under proctoring. We interpret these results as evidence that cheating took place in the online courses prior to proctoring. The results also imply that online proctoring is an effective tool to mitigate academic dishonesty in online courses.Seife DendirR. Stockton MaxwellElsevierarticleAcademic dishonestyCheatingOnline proctoringWebcam proctoringOnline coursesElectronic computers. Computer scienceQA75.5-76.95PsychologyBF1-990ENComputers in Human Behavior Reports, Vol 2, Iss , Pp 100033- (2020) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Academic dishonesty Cheating Online proctoring Webcam proctoring Online courses Electronic computers. Computer science QA75.5-76.95 Psychology BF1-990 |
spellingShingle |
Academic dishonesty Cheating Online proctoring Webcam proctoring Online courses Electronic computers. Computer science QA75.5-76.95 Psychology BF1-990 Seife Dendir R. Stockton Maxwell Cheating in online courses: Evidence from online proctoring |
description |
This study revives the unsettled debate on the extent of academic dishonesty in online courses. It takes advantage of a quasi experiment in which online proctoring using a webcam recording software was introduced for high-stakes exams in two online courses. Each course remained the same in its structure, content and assessments before and after the introduction of online proctoring. Analysis of exam scores shows that online proctoring was associated with a decrease in average performance in both courses. Furthermore, the decrease in scores persists when accounting for potential confounding factors in a regression framework. Finally, in separate regressions of exam performance on student characteristics, the regression explanatory power was higher for scores under proctoring. We interpret these results as evidence that cheating took place in the online courses prior to proctoring. The results also imply that online proctoring is an effective tool to mitigate academic dishonesty in online courses. |
format |
article |
author |
Seife Dendir R. Stockton Maxwell |
author_facet |
Seife Dendir R. Stockton Maxwell |
author_sort |
Seife Dendir |
title |
Cheating in online courses: Evidence from online proctoring |
title_short |
Cheating in online courses: Evidence from online proctoring |
title_full |
Cheating in online courses: Evidence from online proctoring |
title_fullStr |
Cheating in online courses: Evidence from online proctoring |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cheating in online courses: Evidence from online proctoring |
title_sort |
cheating in online courses: evidence from online proctoring |
publisher |
Elsevier |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/aa3ab9a201f44c44854292da11561291 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT seifedendir cheatinginonlinecoursesevidencefromonlineproctoring AT rstocktonmaxwell cheatinginonlinecoursesevidencefromonlineproctoring |
_version_ |
1718405563369390080 |