Critical Relevance of Stochastic Effects on Low-Bacterial-Biomass 16S rRNA Gene Analysis

ABSTRACT The bacterial microbiome of human body sites, previously considered sterile, remains highly controversial because it can be challenging to isolate signal from noise when low-biomass samples are being analyzed. We tested the hypothesis that stochastic sequencing noise, separable from reagent...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: John R. Erb-Downward, Nicole R. Falkowski, Jennifer C. D’Souza, Lisa M. McCloskey, Roderick A. McDonald, Christopher A. Brown, Kerby Shedden, Robert P. Dickson, Christine M. Freeman, Kathleen A. Stringer, Betsy Foxman, Gary B. Huffnagle, Jeffrey L. Curtis, Sara D. Adar
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ad2262303bef4b7eacca97265e84955c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ad2262303bef4b7eacca97265e84955c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ad2262303bef4b7eacca97265e84955c2021-11-15T15:56:47ZCritical Relevance of Stochastic Effects on Low-Bacterial-Biomass 16S rRNA Gene Analysis10.1128/mBio.00258-202150-7511https://doaj.org/article/ad2262303bef4b7eacca97265e84955c2020-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/mBio.00258-20https://doaj.org/toc/2150-7511ABSTRACT The bacterial microbiome of human body sites, previously considered sterile, remains highly controversial because it can be challenging to isolate signal from noise when low-biomass samples are being analyzed. We tested the hypothesis that stochastic sequencing noise, separable from reagent contamination, is generated during sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform when DNA input is below a critical threshold. We first purified DNA from serial dilutions of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and from negative controls using three DNA purification kits, quantified input using droplet digital PCR, and then sequenced the 16S rRNA gene in four technical replicates. This process identified reproducible contaminant signal that was separable from an irreproducible stochastic noise, which occurred as bacterial biomass of samples decreased. This approach was then applied to authentic respiratory samples from healthy individuals (n = 22) that ranged from high to ultralow bacterial biomass. Using oral rinse, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, and exhaled breath condensate (EBC) samples and matched controls, we were able to demonstrate (i) that stochastic noise dominates sequencing in real-world low-bacterial-biomass samples that contain fewer than 104 copies of the 16S rRNA gene per sample, (ii) that critical examination of the community composition of technical replicates can be used to separate signal from noise, and (iii) that EBC is an irreproducible sampling modality for sampling the microbiome of the lower airways. We anticipate that these results combined with suggested methods for identifying and dealing with noisy communities will facilitate increased reproducibility while simultaneously permitting characterization of potentially important low-biomass communities. IMPORTANCE DNA contamination from external sources (reagents, environment, operator, etc.) has long been assumed to be the main cause of spurious signals that appear under low-bacterial-biomass conditions. Here, we demonstrate that contamination can be separated from another, random signal generated during low-biomass-sample sequencing. This stochastic noise is not reproduced between technical replicates; however, results for any one replicate taken alone could look like a microbial community different from the controls. Using this information, we investigated respiratory samples from healthy humans and determined the narrow range of bacterial biomass where samples transition from producing reproducible microbial sequences to ones dominated by noise. We present a rigorous approach to studies involving low-bacterial-biomass samples to detect this source of noise and provide a framework for deciding if a sample is likely to be dominated by noise. We anticipate that this work will facilitate increased reproducibility in the characterization of potentially important low-biomass communities.John R. Erb-DownwardNicole R. FalkowskiJennifer C. D’SouzaLisa M. McCloskeyRoderick A. McDonaldChristopher A. BrownKerby SheddenRobert P. DicksonChristine M. FreemanKathleen A. StringerBetsy FoxmanGary B. HuffnagleJeffrey L. CurtisSara D. AdarAmerican Society for Microbiologyarticle16S rRNA genecontaminationexhaled breath condensatelow biomasslung microbiomesequencing noiseMicrobiologyQR1-502ENmBio, Vol 11, Iss 3 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic 16S rRNA gene
contamination
exhaled breath condensate
low biomass
lung microbiome
sequencing noise
Microbiology
QR1-502
spellingShingle 16S rRNA gene
contamination
exhaled breath condensate
low biomass
lung microbiome
sequencing noise
Microbiology
QR1-502
John R. Erb-Downward
Nicole R. Falkowski
Jennifer C. D’Souza
Lisa M. McCloskey
Roderick A. McDonald
Christopher A. Brown
Kerby Shedden
Robert P. Dickson
Christine M. Freeman
Kathleen A. Stringer
Betsy Foxman
Gary B. Huffnagle
Jeffrey L. Curtis
Sara D. Adar
Critical Relevance of Stochastic Effects on Low-Bacterial-Biomass 16S rRNA Gene Analysis
description ABSTRACT The bacterial microbiome of human body sites, previously considered sterile, remains highly controversial because it can be challenging to isolate signal from noise when low-biomass samples are being analyzed. We tested the hypothesis that stochastic sequencing noise, separable from reagent contamination, is generated during sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform when DNA input is below a critical threshold. We first purified DNA from serial dilutions of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and from negative controls using three DNA purification kits, quantified input using droplet digital PCR, and then sequenced the 16S rRNA gene in four technical replicates. This process identified reproducible contaminant signal that was separable from an irreproducible stochastic noise, which occurred as bacterial biomass of samples decreased. This approach was then applied to authentic respiratory samples from healthy individuals (n = 22) that ranged from high to ultralow bacterial biomass. Using oral rinse, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, and exhaled breath condensate (EBC) samples and matched controls, we were able to demonstrate (i) that stochastic noise dominates sequencing in real-world low-bacterial-biomass samples that contain fewer than 104 copies of the 16S rRNA gene per sample, (ii) that critical examination of the community composition of technical replicates can be used to separate signal from noise, and (iii) that EBC is an irreproducible sampling modality for sampling the microbiome of the lower airways. We anticipate that these results combined with suggested methods for identifying and dealing with noisy communities will facilitate increased reproducibility while simultaneously permitting characterization of potentially important low-biomass communities. IMPORTANCE DNA contamination from external sources (reagents, environment, operator, etc.) has long been assumed to be the main cause of spurious signals that appear under low-bacterial-biomass conditions. Here, we demonstrate that contamination can be separated from another, random signal generated during low-biomass-sample sequencing. This stochastic noise is not reproduced between technical replicates; however, results for any one replicate taken alone could look like a microbial community different from the controls. Using this information, we investigated respiratory samples from healthy humans and determined the narrow range of bacterial biomass where samples transition from producing reproducible microbial sequences to ones dominated by noise. We present a rigorous approach to studies involving low-bacterial-biomass samples to detect this source of noise and provide a framework for deciding if a sample is likely to be dominated by noise. We anticipate that this work will facilitate increased reproducibility in the characterization of potentially important low-biomass communities.
format article
author John R. Erb-Downward
Nicole R. Falkowski
Jennifer C. D’Souza
Lisa M. McCloskey
Roderick A. McDonald
Christopher A. Brown
Kerby Shedden
Robert P. Dickson
Christine M. Freeman
Kathleen A. Stringer
Betsy Foxman
Gary B. Huffnagle
Jeffrey L. Curtis
Sara D. Adar
author_facet John R. Erb-Downward
Nicole R. Falkowski
Jennifer C. D’Souza
Lisa M. McCloskey
Roderick A. McDonald
Christopher A. Brown
Kerby Shedden
Robert P. Dickson
Christine M. Freeman
Kathleen A. Stringer
Betsy Foxman
Gary B. Huffnagle
Jeffrey L. Curtis
Sara D. Adar
author_sort John R. Erb-Downward
title Critical Relevance of Stochastic Effects on Low-Bacterial-Biomass 16S rRNA Gene Analysis
title_short Critical Relevance of Stochastic Effects on Low-Bacterial-Biomass 16S rRNA Gene Analysis
title_full Critical Relevance of Stochastic Effects on Low-Bacterial-Biomass 16S rRNA Gene Analysis
title_fullStr Critical Relevance of Stochastic Effects on Low-Bacterial-Biomass 16S rRNA Gene Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Critical Relevance of Stochastic Effects on Low-Bacterial-Biomass 16S rRNA Gene Analysis
title_sort critical relevance of stochastic effects on low-bacterial-biomass 16s rrna gene analysis
publisher American Society for Microbiology
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/ad2262303bef4b7eacca97265e84955c
work_keys_str_mv AT johnrerbdownward criticalrelevanceofstochasticeffectsonlowbacterialbiomass16srrnageneanalysis
AT nicolerfalkowski criticalrelevanceofstochasticeffectsonlowbacterialbiomass16srrnageneanalysis
AT jennifercdsouza criticalrelevanceofstochasticeffectsonlowbacterialbiomass16srrnageneanalysis
AT lisammccloskey criticalrelevanceofstochasticeffectsonlowbacterialbiomass16srrnageneanalysis
AT roderickamcdonald criticalrelevanceofstochasticeffectsonlowbacterialbiomass16srrnageneanalysis
AT christopherabrown criticalrelevanceofstochasticeffectsonlowbacterialbiomass16srrnageneanalysis
AT kerbyshedden criticalrelevanceofstochasticeffectsonlowbacterialbiomass16srrnageneanalysis
AT robertpdickson criticalrelevanceofstochasticeffectsonlowbacterialbiomass16srrnageneanalysis
AT christinemfreeman criticalrelevanceofstochasticeffectsonlowbacterialbiomass16srrnageneanalysis
AT kathleenastringer criticalrelevanceofstochasticeffectsonlowbacterialbiomass16srrnageneanalysis
AT betsyfoxman criticalrelevanceofstochasticeffectsonlowbacterialbiomass16srrnageneanalysis
AT garybhuffnagle criticalrelevanceofstochasticeffectsonlowbacterialbiomass16srrnageneanalysis
AT jeffreylcurtis criticalrelevanceofstochasticeffectsonlowbacterialbiomass16srrnageneanalysis
AT saradadar criticalrelevanceofstochasticeffectsonlowbacterialbiomass16srrnageneanalysis
_version_ 1718427112796323840