Evaluation of excess significance bias in animal studies of neurological diseases.
Animal studies generate valuable hypotheses that lead to the conduct of preventive or therapeutic clinical trials. We assessed whether there is evidence for excess statistical significance in results of animal studies on neurological disorders, suggesting biases. We used data from meta-analyses of i...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Konstantinos K Tsilidis, Orestis A Panagiotou, Emily S Sena, Eleni Aretouli, Evangelos Evangelou, David W Howells, Rustam Al-Shahi Salman, Malcolm R Macleod, John P A Ioannidis |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/bca865a5a5cf43c1bf8387fb018d8c16 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Publication bias in reports of animal stroke studies leads to major overstatement of efficacy.
por: Emily S Sena, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
GWAS of allometric body-shape indices in UK Biobank identifies loci suggesting associations with morphogenesis, organogenesis, adrenal cell renewal and cancer
por: Sofia Christakoudi, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Fifty-year fate and impact of general medical journals.
por: John P A Ioannidis, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Can animal models of disease reliably inform human studies?
por: H Bart van der Worp, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Stem cell transplantation in traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies.
por: Ana Antonic, et al.
Publicado: (2013)