Identification and comparison of key criteria of feedback of funding decisions: mixed-methods analysis of funder and applicant perspectives
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Abby Bull, Katie Meadmore, Kathryn Fackrell, Amanda Blatch-Jones, Alejandra Recio-Saucedo, Simon Fraser |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Language: | EN |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doaj.org/article/beb3a7064d0b471eba0059bd5ed7722b |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
A conversation on the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on junior researchers’ careers with funders and university leaders
Published: (2021) - Multiple Criteria Decision Making (20841531)
-
Selected decisions of the International Monetary Fund and selected documents.
Published: (1981) -
"He who pays the piper calls the tune": Researcher experiences of funder suppression of health behaviour intervention trial findings.
by: Sam McCrabb, et al.
Published: (2021) -
The what, why and when of adapting interventions for new contexts: A qualitative study of researchers, funders, journal editors and practitioners' understandings.
by: Lauren Copeland, et al.
Published: (2021)