Exploiting collider bias to apply two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization methods to one-sample individual level data.

Over the last decade the availability of SNP-trait associations from genome-wide association studies has led to an array of methods for performing Mendelian randomization studies using only summary statistics. A common feature of these methods, besides their intuitive simplicity, is the ability to c...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ciarrah Barry, Junxi Liu, Rebecca Richmond, Martin K Rutter, Deborah A Lawlor, Frank Dudbridge, Jack Bowden
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c099838721364574958c3eb547906b95
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c099838721364574958c3eb547906b95
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c099838721364574958c3eb547906b952021-12-02T20:03:23ZExploiting collider bias to apply two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization methods to one-sample individual level data.1553-73901553-740410.1371/journal.pgen.1009703https://doaj.org/article/c099838721364574958c3eb547906b952021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009703https://doaj.org/toc/1553-7390https://doaj.org/toc/1553-7404Over the last decade the availability of SNP-trait associations from genome-wide association studies has led to an array of methods for performing Mendelian randomization studies using only summary statistics. A common feature of these methods, besides their intuitive simplicity, is the ability to combine data from several sources, incorporate multiple variants and account for biases due to weak instruments and pleiotropy. With the advent of large and accessible fully-genotyped cohorts such as UK Biobank, there is now increasing interest in understanding how best to apply these well developed summary data methods to individual level data, and to explore the use of more sophisticated causal methods allowing for non-linearity and effect modification. In this paper we describe a general procedure for optimally applying any two sample summary data method using one sample data. Our procedure first performs a meta-analysis of summary data estimates that are intentionally contaminated by collider bias between the genetic instruments and unmeasured confounders, due to conditioning on the observed exposure. These estimates are then used to correct the standard observational association between an exposure and outcome. Simulations are conducted to demonstrate the method's performance against naive applications of two sample summary data MR. We apply the approach to the UK Biobank cohort to investigate the causal role of sleep disturbance on HbA1c levels, an important determinant of diabetes. Our approach can be viewed as a generalization of Dudbridge et al. (Nat. Comm. 10: 1561), who developed a technique to adjust for index event bias when uncovering genetic predictors of disease progression based on case-only data. Our work serves to clarify that in any one sample MR analysis, it can be advantageous to estimate causal relationships by artificially inducing and then correcting for collider bias.Ciarrah BarryJunxi LiuRebecca RichmondMartin K RutterDeborah A LawlorFrank DudbridgeJack BowdenPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleGeneticsQH426-470ENPLoS Genetics, Vol 17, Iss 8, p e1009703 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Genetics
QH426-470
spellingShingle Genetics
QH426-470
Ciarrah Barry
Junxi Liu
Rebecca Richmond
Martin K Rutter
Deborah A Lawlor
Frank Dudbridge
Jack Bowden
Exploiting collider bias to apply two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization methods to one-sample individual level data.
description Over the last decade the availability of SNP-trait associations from genome-wide association studies has led to an array of methods for performing Mendelian randomization studies using only summary statistics. A common feature of these methods, besides their intuitive simplicity, is the ability to combine data from several sources, incorporate multiple variants and account for biases due to weak instruments and pleiotropy. With the advent of large and accessible fully-genotyped cohorts such as UK Biobank, there is now increasing interest in understanding how best to apply these well developed summary data methods to individual level data, and to explore the use of more sophisticated causal methods allowing for non-linearity and effect modification. In this paper we describe a general procedure for optimally applying any two sample summary data method using one sample data. Our procedure first performs a meta-analysis of summary data estimates that are intentionally contaminated by collider bias between the genetic instruments and unmeasured confounders, due to conditioning on the observed exposure. These estimates are then used to correct the standard observational association between an exposure and outcome. Simulations are conducted to demonstrate the method's performance against naive applications of two sample summary data MR. We apply the approach to the UK Biobank cohort to investigate the causal role of sleep disturbance on HbA1c levels, an important determinant of diabetes. Our approach can be viewed as a generalization of Dudbridge et al. (Nat. Comm. 10: 1561), who developed a technique to adjust for index event bias when uncovering genetic predictors of disease progression based on case-only data. Our work serves to clarify that in any one sample MR analysis, it can be advantageous to estimate causal relationships by artificially inducing and then correcting for collider bias.
format article
author Ciarrah Barry
Junxi Liu
Rebecca Richmond
Martin K Rutter
Deborah A Lawlor
Frank Dudbridge
Jack Bowden
author_facet Ciarrah Barry
Junxi Liu
Rebecca Richmond
Martin K Rutter
Deborah A Lawlor
Frank Dudbridge
Jack Bowden
author_sort Ciarrah Barry
title Exploiting collider bias to apply two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization methods to one-sample individual level data.
title_short Exploiting collider bias to apply two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization methods to one-sample individual level data.
title_full Exploiting collider bias to apply two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization methods to one-sample individual level data.
title_fullStr Exploiting collider bias to apply two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization methods to one-sample individual level data.
title_full_unstemmed Exploiting collider bias to apply two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization methods to one-sample individual level data.
title_sort exploiting collider bias to apply two-sample summary data mendelian randomization methods to one-sample individual level data.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/c099838721364574958c3eb547906b95
work_keys_str_mv AT ciarrahbarry exploitingcolliderbiastoapplytwosamplesummarydatamendelianrandomizationmethodstoonesampleindividualleveldata
AT junxiliu exploitingcolliderbiastoapplytwosamplesummarydatamendelianrandomizationmethodstoonesampleindividualleveldata
AT rebeccarichmond exploitingcolliderbiastoapplytwosamplesummarydatamendelianrandomizationmethodstoonesampleindividualleveldata
AT martinkrutter exploitingcolliderbiastoapplytwosamplesummarydatamendelianrandomizationmethodstoonesampleindividualleveldata
AT deborahalawlor exploitingcolliderbiastoapplytwosamplesummarydatamendelianrandomizationmethodstoonesampleindividualleveldata
AT frankdudbridge exploitingcolliderbiastoapplytwosamplesummarydatamendelianrandomizationmethodstoonesampleindividualleveldata
AT jackbowden exploitingcolliderbiastoapplytwosamplesummarydatamendelianrandomizationmethodstoonesampleindividualleveldata
_version_ 1718375684392353792