Comparison of classical nucleation theory and modern theory of phase transition in the case of electrochemical nucleation

Electrodeposition of nanostructures has been considered in terms of the classical Gibbs and the Cahn–Hilliard–Hillert theories. Agreement between the Cahn–Hilliard–Hillert and Gibbs theories has been obtained. Therefore, there is no contradiction between the Cahn–Hilliard– Hillert and Gibbs theories...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Baranov, Serghei
Format: article
Language:EN
Published: D.Ghitu Institute of Electronic Engineering and Nanotechnologies 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doaj.org/article/c2be98954c9f4d28a8943ce167eb730c
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c2be98954c9f4d28a8943ce167eb730c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c2be98954c9f4d28a8943ce167eb730c2021-11-21T11:57:31ZComparison of classical nucleation theory and modern theory of phase transition in the case of electrochemical nucleation544.22537-63651810-648Xhttps://doaj.org/article/c2be98954c9f4d28a8943ce167eb730c2016-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://mjps.nanotech.md/archive/2016/article/50390https://doaj.org/toc/1810-648Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2537-6365Electrodeposition of nanostructures has been considered in terms of the classical Gibbs and the Cahn–Hilliard–Hillert theories. Agreement between the Cahn–Hilliard–Hillert and Gibbs theories has been obtained. Therefore, there is no contradiction between the Cahn–Hilliard– Hillert and Gibbs theories. Baranov, SergheiD.Ghitu Institute of Electronic Engineering and NanotechnologiesarticlePhysicsQC1-999ElectronicsTK7800-8360ENMoldavian Journal of the Physical Sciences, Vol 15, Iss 3-4, Pp 225-230 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Physics
QC1-999
Electronics
TK7800-8360
spellingShingle Physics
QC1-999
Electronics
TK7800-8360
Baranov, Serghei
Comparison of classical nucleation theory and modern theory of phase transition in the case of electrochemical nucleation
description Electrodeposition of nanostructures has been considered in terms of the classical Gibbs and the Cahn–Hilliard–Hillert theories. Agreement between the Cahn–Hilliard–Hillert and Gibbs theories has been obtained. Therefore, there is no contradiction between the Cahn–Hilliard– Hillert and Gibbs theories.
format article
author Baranov, Serghei
author_facet Baranov, Serghei
author_sort Baranov, Serghei
title Comparison of classical nucleation theory and modern theory of phase transition in the case of electrochemical nucleation
title_short Comparison of classical nucleation theory and modern theory of phase transition in the case of electrochemical nucleation
title_full Comparison of classical nucleation theory and modern theory of phase transition in the case of electrochemical nucleation
title_fullStr Comparison of classical nucleation theory and modern theory of phase transition in the case of electrochemical nucleation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of classical nucleation theory and modern theory of phase transition in the case of electrochemical nucleation
title_sort comparison of classical nucleation theory and modern theory of phase transition in the case of electrochemical nucleation
publisher D.Ghitu Institute of Electronic Engineering and Nanotechnologies
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/c2be98954c9f4d28a8943ce167eb730c
work_keys_str_mv AT baranovserghei comparisonofclassicalnucleationtheoryandmoderntheoryofphasetransitioninthecaseofelectrochemicalnucleation
_version_ 1718419388759015424