The impact of different DNA extraction kits and laboratories upon the assessment of human gut microbiota composition by 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
<h4>Introduction</h4>Determining bacterial community structure in fecal samples through DNA sequencing is an important facet of intestinal health research. The impact of different commercially available DNA extraction kits upon bacterial community structures has received relatively littl...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/c98343b17e2844f799fdc6a7f299a077 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:c98343b17e2844f799fdc6a7f299a077 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:c98343b17e2844f799fdc6a7f299a0772021-11-18T08:31:23ZThe impact of different DNA extraction kits and laboratories upon the assessment of human gut microbiota composition by 16S rRNA gene sequencing.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0088982https://doaj.org/article/c98343b17e2844f799fdc6a7f299a0772014-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24586470/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Introduction</h4>Determining bacterial community structure in fecal samples through DNA sequencing is an important facet of intestinal health research. The impact of different commercially available DNA extraction kits upon bacterial community structures has received relatively little attention. The aim of this study was to analyze bacterial communities in volunteer and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patient fecal samples extracted using widely used DNA extraction kits in established gastrointestinal research laboratories.<h4>Methods</h4>Fecal samples from two healthy volunteers (H3 and H4) and two relapsing IBD patients (I1 and I2) were investigated. DNA extraction was undertaken using MoBio Powersoil and MP Biomedicals FastDNA SPIN Kit for Soil DNA extraction kits. PCR amplification for pyrosequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA genes was performed in both laboratories on all samples. Hierarchical clustering of sequencing data was done using the Yue and Clayton similarity coefficient.<h4>Results</h4>DNA extracted using the FastDNA kit and the MoBio kit gave median DNA concentrations of 475 (interquartile range 228-561) and 22 (IQR 9-36) ng/µL respectively (p<0.0001). Hierarchical clustering of sequence data by Yue and Clayton coefficient revealed four clusters. Samples from individuals H3 and I2 clustered by patient; however, samples from patient I1 extracted with the MoBio kit clustered with samples from patient H4 rather than the other I1 samples. Linear modelling on relative abundance of common bacterial families revealed significant differences between kits; samples extracted with MoBio Powersoil showed significantly increased Bacteroidaceae, Ruminococcaceae and Porphyromonadaceae, and lower Enterobacteriaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Clostridiaceae, and Erysipelotrichaceae (p<0.05).<h4>Conclusion</h4>This study demonstrates significant differences in DNA yield and bacterial DNA composition when comparing DNA extracted from the same fecal sample with different extraction kits. This highlights the importance of ensuring that samples in a study are prepared with the same method, and the need for caution when cross-comparing studies that use different methods.Nicholas A KennedyAlan W WalkerSusan H BerrySylvia H DuncanFreda M FarquarsonPetra LouisJohn M ThomsonUK IBD Genetics ConsortiumJack SatsangiHarry J FlintJulian ParkhillCharlie W LeesGeorgina L HoldPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 2, p e88982 (2014) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN |
| topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
| spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Nicholas A Kennedy Alan W Walker Susan H Berry Sylvia H Duncan Freda M Farquarson Petra Louis John M Thomson UK IBD Genetics Consortium Jack Satsangi Harry J Flint Julian Parkhill Charlie W Lees Georgina L Hold The impact of different DNA extraction kits and laboratories upon the assessment of human gut microbiota composition by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. |
| description |
<h4>Introduction</h4>Determining bacterial community structure in fecal samples through DNA sequencing is an important facet of intestinal health research. The impact of different commercially available DNA extraction kits upon bacterial community structures has received relatively little attention. The aim of this study was to analyze bacterial communities in volunteer and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patient fecal samples extracted using widely used DNA extraction kits in established gastrointestinal research laboratories.<h4>Methods</h4>Fecal samples from two healthy volunteers (H3 and H4) and two relapsing IBD patients (I1 and I2) were investigated. DNA extraction was undertaken using MoBio Powersoil and MP Biomedicals FastDNA SPIN Kit for Soil DNA extraction kits. PCR amplification for pyrosequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA genes was performed in both laboratories on all samples. Hierarchical clustering of sequencing data was done using the Yue and Clayton similarity coefficient.<h4>Results</h4>DNA extracted using the FastDNA kit and the MoBio kit gave median DNA concentrations of 475 (interquartile range 228-561) and 22 (IQR 9-36) ng/µL respectively (p<0.0001). Hierarchical clustering of sequence data by Yue and Clayton coefficient revealed four clusters. Samples from individuals H3 and I2 clustered by patient; however, samples from patient I1 extracted with the MoBio kit clustered with samples from patient H4 rather than the other I1 samples. Linear modelling on relative abundance of common bacterial families revealed significant differences between kits; samples extracted with MoBio Powersoil showed significantly increased Bacteroidaceae, Ruminococcaceae and Porphyromonadaceae, and lower Enterobacteriaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Clostridiaceae, and Erysipelotrichaceae (p<0.05).<h4>Conclusion</h4>This study demonstrates significant differences in DNA yield and bacterial DNA composition when comparing DNA extracted from the same fecal sample with different extraction kits. This highlights the importance of ensuring that samples in a study are prepared with the same method, and the need for caution when cross-comparing studies that use different methods. |
| format |
article |
| author |
Nicholas A Kennedy Alan W Walker Susan H Berry Sylvia H Duncan Freda M Farquarson Petra Louis John M Thomson UK IBD Genetics Consortium Jack Satsangi Harry J Flint Julian Parkhill Charlie W Lees Georgina L Hold |
| author_facet |
Nicholas A Kennedy Alan W Walker Susan H Berry Sylvia H Duncan Freda M Farquarson Petra Louis John M Thomson UK IBD Genetics Consortium Jack Satsangi Harry J Flint Julian Parkhill Charlie W Lees Georgina L Hold |
| author_sort |
Nicholas A Kennedy |
| title |
The impact of different DNA extraction kits and laboratories upon the assessment of human gut microbiota composition by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. |
| title_short |
The impact of different DNA extraction kits and laboratories upon the assessment of human gut microbiota composition by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. |
| title_full |
The impact of different DNA extraction kits and laboratories upon the assessment of human gut microbiota composition by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. |
| title_fullStr |
The impact of different DNA extraction kits and laboratories upon the assessment of human gut microbiota composition by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The impact of different DNA extraction kits and laboratories upon the assessment of human gut microbiota composition by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. |
| title_sort |
impact of different dna extraction kits and laboratories upon the assessment of human gut microbiota composition by 16s rrna gene sequencing. |
| publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/c98343b17e2844f799fdc6a7f299a077 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT nicholasakennedy theimpactofdifferentdnaextractionkitsandlaboratoriesupontheassessmentofhumangutmicrobiotacompositionby16srrnagenesequencing AT alanwwalker theimpactofdifferentdnaextractionkitsandlaboratoriesupontheassessmentofhumangutmicrobiotacompositionby16srrnagenesequencing AT susanhberry theimpactofdifferentdnaextractionkitsandlaboratoriesupontheassessmentofhumangutmicrobiotacompositionby16srrnagenesequencing AT sylviahduncan theimpactofdifferentdnaextractionkitsandlaboratoriesupontheassessmentofhumangutmicrobiotacompositionby16srrnagenesequencing AT fredamfarquarson theimpactofdifferentdnaextractionkitsandlaboratoriesupontheassessmentofhumangutmicrobiotacompositionby16srrnagenesequencing AT petralouis theimpactofdifferentdnaextractionkitsandlaboratoriesupontheassessmentofhumangutmicrobiotacompositionby16srrnagenesequencing AT johnmthomson theimpactofdifferentdnaextractionkitsandlaboratoriesupontheassessmentofhumangutmicrobiotacompositionby16srrnagenesequencing AT ukibdgeneticsconsortium theimpactofdifferentdnaextractionkitsandlaboratoriesupontheassessmentofhumangutmicrobiotacompositionby16srrnagenesequencing AT jacksatsangi theimpactofdifferentdnaextractionkitsandlaboratoriesupontheassessmentofhumangutmicrobiotacompositionby16srrnagenesequencing AT harryjflint theimpactofdifferentdnaextractionkitsandlaboratoriesupontheassessmentofhumangutmicrobiotacompositionby16srrnagenesequencing AT julianparkhill theimpactofdifferentdnaextractionkitsandlaboratoriesupontheassessmentofhumangutmicrobiotacompositionby16srrnagenesequencing AT charliewlees theimpactofdifferentdnaextractionkitsandlaboratoriesupontheassessmentofhumangutmicrobiotacompositionby16srrnagenesequencing AT georginalhold theimpactofdifferentdnaextractionkitsandlaboratoriesupontheassessmentofhumangutmicrobiotacompositionby16srrnagenesequencing AT nicholasakennedy impactofdifferentdnaextractionkitsandlaboratoriesupontheassessmentofhumangutmicrobiotacompositionby16srrnagenesequencing AT alanwwalker impactofdifferentdnaextractionkitsandlaboratoriesupontheassessmentofhumangutmicrobiotacompositionby16srrnagenesequencing AT susanhberry impactofdifferentdnaextractionkitsandlaboratoriesupontheassessmentofhumangutmicrobiotacompositionby16srrnagenesequencing AT sylviahduncan impactofdifferentdnaextractionkitsandlaboratoriesupontheassessmentofhumangutmicrobiotacompositionby16srrnagenesequencing AT fredamfarquarson impactofdifferentdnaextractionkitsandlaboratoriesupontheassessmentofhumangutmicrobiotacompositionby16srrnagenesequencing AT petralouis impactofdifferentdnaextractionkitsandlaboratoriesupontheassessmentofhumangutmicrobiotacompositionby16srrnagenesequencing AT johnmthomson impactofdifferentdnaextractionkitsandlaboratoriesupontheassessmentofhumangutmicrobiotacompositionby16srrnagenesequencing AT ukibdgeneticsconsortium impactofdifferentdnaextractionkitsandlaboratoriesupontheassessmentofhumangutmicrobiotacompositionby16srrnagenesequencing AT jacksatsangi impactofdifferentdnaextractionkitsandlaboratoriesupontheassessmentofhumangutmicrobiotacompositionby16srrnagenesequencing AT harryjflint impactofdifferentdnaextractionkitsandlaboratoriesupontheassessmentofhumangutmicrobiotacompositionby16srrnagenesequencing AT julianparkhill impactofdifferentdnaextractionkitsandlaboratoriesupontheassessmentofhumangutmicrobiotacompositionby16srrnagenesequencing AT charliewlees impactofdifferentdnaextractionkitsandlaboratoriesupontheassessmentofhumangutmicrobiotacompositionby16srrnagenesequencing AT georginalhold impactofdifferentdnaextractionkitsandlaboratoriesupontheassessmentofhumangutmicrobiotacompositionby16srrnagenesequencing |
| _version_ |
1718421708160892928 |