Whose wellbeing is it anyway?

In this opinion piece, I suggest the need for a critical examination of the ‘wellbeing’ agenda currently being developed throughout Higher Education (HE) in the UK. I suggest that problems arise when notions of ‘wellbeing’ are used without being sufficiently well-defined, and are then accepted as th...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Sunny Dhillon
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Association for Learning Development in Higher Education (ALDinHE) 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/cb3964f7d2ab4ba6b08ba562028bd3dc
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:cb3964f7d2ab4ba6b08ba562028bd3dc
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:cb3964f7d2ab4ba6b08ba562028bd3dc2021-11-29T14:02:49ZWhose wellbeing is it anyway?10.47408/jldhe.v0i0.4601759-667Xhttps://doaj.org/article/cb3964f7d2ab4ba6b08ba562028bd3dc2018-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://repl.gianfj.com/index.php/jldhe/article/view/460https://doaj.org/toc/1759-667XIn this opinion piece, I suggest the need for a critical examination of the ‘wellbeing’ agenda currently being developed throughout Higher Education (HE) in the UK. I suggest that problems arise when notions of ‘wellbeing’ are used without being sufficiently well-defined, and are then accepted as the barometer of student health. This approach will be elucidated by contextualising the situation students find themselves in contemporary neoliberal universities; situating the crucial intermediary role that learning developers and student support services fulfil between academics and students; and exploring different modes of engagement available to those in these roles. Drawing upon the critical pedagogy of Biesta (2013), I argue that the remit of cultivating critical thinking and independent study skills means that learning developers, through one-to-one meetings, may sometimes be as well-placed as those with specific wellbeing roles (such as counsellors or mental health workers) to acknowledge and explore students’ personal and social anxieties and concerns with compassion. This approach may seem to be at odds with wellbeing rhetoric, which, I argue, can act to detract from critical engagement with the explicit challenges facing students in the contemporary socio-political milieu. My aim is therefore to reintroduce the notion of criticality within the discussions taking place among academics and professional support staff, which in turn may inform practice. Central to my aim in this is to raise broader questions around the primary role of academics and professionals in HE; for example, is it to train students to passively ‘fit in’ within society or to educate them in a manner such that they will act agentively in society? Sunny DhillonAssociation for Learning Development in Higher Education (ALDinHE)articlecritical thinkingneoliberalismpedagogy of discomfortwellbeingTheory and practice of educationLB5-3640ENJournal of Learning Development in Higher Education (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic critical thinking
neoliberalism
pedagogy of discomfort
wellbeing
Theory and practice of education
LB5-3640
spellingShingle critical thinking
neoliberalism
pedagogy of discomfort
wellbeing
Theory and practice of education
LB5-3640
Sunny Dhillon
Whose wellbeing is it anyway?
description In this opinion piece, I suggest the need for a critical examination of the ‘wellbeing’ agenda currently being developed throughout Higher Education (HE) in the UK. I suggest that problems arise when notions of ‘wellbeing’ are used without being sufficiently well-defined, and are then accepted as the barometer of student health. This approach will be elucidated by contextualising the situation students find themselves in contemporary neoliberal universities; situating the crucial intermediary role that learning developers and student support services fulfil between academics and students; and exploring different modes of engagement available to those in these roles. Drawing upon the critical pedagogy of Biesta (2013), I argue that the remit of cultivating critical thinking and independent study skills means that learning developers, through one-to-one meetings, may sometimes be as well-placed as those with specific wellbeing roles (such as counsellors or mental health workers) to acknowledge and explore students’ personal and social anxieties and concerns with compassion. This approach may seem to be at odds with wellbeing rhetoric, which, I argue, can act to detract from critical engagement with the explicit challenges facing students in the contemporary socio-political milieu. My aim is therefore to reintroduce the notion of criticality within the discussions taking place among academics and professional support staff, which in turn may inform practice. Central to my aim in this is to raise broader questions around the primary role of academics and professionals in HE; for example, is it to train students to passively ‘fit in’ within society or to educate them in a manner such that they will act agentively in society?
format article
author Sunny Dhillon
author_facet Sunny Dhillon
author_sort Sunny Dhillon
title Whose wellbeing is it anyway?
title_short Whose wellbeing is it anyway?
title_full Whose wellbeing is it anyway?
title_fullStr Whose wellbeing is it anyway?
title_full_unstemmed Whose wellbeing is it anyway?
title_sort whose wellbeing is it anyway?
publisher Association for Learning Development in Higher Education (ALDinHE)
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/cb3964f7d2ab4ba6b08ba562028bd3dc
work_keys_str_mv AT sunnydhillon whosewellbeingisitanyway
_version_ 1718407312458121216