Mass & secondary structure propensity of amino acids explain their mutability and evolutionary replacements
Abstract Why is an amino acid replacement in a protein accepted during evolution? The answer given by bioinformatics relies on the frequency of change of each amino acid by another one and the propensity of each to remain unchanged. We propose that these replacement rules are recoverable from the se...
Enregistré dans:
Auteurs principaux: | Hugo J. Bohórquez, Carlos F. Suárez, Manuel E. Patarroyo |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Langue: | EN |
Publié: |
Nature Portfolio
2017
|
Sujets: | |
Accès en ligne: | https://doaj.org/article/cb76b1d6138444888f1136d1f6f0f2f2 |
Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
Documents similaires
-
Optimization of amino acid replacement costs by mutational pressure in bacterial genomes
par: Paweł Błażej, et autres
Publié: (2017) -
iSNO-PseAAC: predict cysteine S-nitrosylation sites in proteins by incorporating position specific amino acid propensity into pseudo amino acid composition.
par: Yan Xu, et autres
Publié: (2013) -
Evolutionary systems biology of amino acid biosynthetic cost in yeast.
par: Michael D Barton, et autres
Publié: (2010) -
Mutability dynamics of an emergent single stranded DNA virus in a naïve host.
par: Subir Sarker, et autres
Publié: (2014) -
Using mutability landscapes of a promiscuous tautomerase to guide the engineering of enantioselective Michaelases
par: Jan-Ytzen van der Meer, et autres
Publié: (2016)