Tailored vs. Standard Curriculum and General English Achievement: A Study of Teachers’ Views

This study was conducted in two phases. The first one is the preliminary phase aimed at tailoring the standard curriculum based on learners’ needs analysis. The second one is the main phase, intended to evaluate the tailored curriculum based on teachers’ views. The participants in the preliminary p...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bizhan Hekmatshoar Tabari, Ramin Rahimy
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
ES
Publicado: Universidad de La Sabana 2021
Materias:
EGP
NA
L
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d8449701911042d38d54628c6612a289
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d8449701911042d38d54628c6612a289
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d8449701911042d38d54628c6612a2892021-11-29T02:19:14ZTailored vs. Standard Curriculum and General English Achievement: A Study of Teachers’ Views10.5294/laclil.2021.14.1.52011-67212322-9721https://doaj.org/article/d8449701911042d38d54628c6612a2892021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://laclil.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/LACLIL/article/view/14409https://doaj.org/toc/2011-6721https://doaj.org/toc/2322-9721 This study was conducted in two phases. The first one is the preliminary phase aimed at tailoring the standard curriculum based on learners’ needs analysis. The second one is the main phase, intended to evaluate the tailored curriculum based on teachers’ views. The participants in the preliminary phase of the study (tailoring the curriculum) were 346 non-native male and female undergraduate students who received the same Pre-Requisite General English course at their first semester in university. They were studying different majors, including Accounting, Architecture, Civil Engineering, Electrical Engineering, and Mechanical Engineering. The participants in the main phase (evaluation of the tailored curriculum by teachers) were 10 non-native male (7) and female (3) teachers who taught the Pre-Requisite General English course through the tailored curriculum. The findings of the study supported the hypothesis that the teachers have a positive attitude toward using the tailored curriculum in teaching the Pre-Requisite General English course. It seems that the implementation of this tailored program, which is based on learner-needs-analysis, can enhance the effectiveness of the English for General Purposes (EGP) course, compared to the standard one. Bizhan Hekmatshoar TabariRamin RahimyUniversidad de La SabanaarticleEnglish for General PurposesEGPneeds analysisNApre-requisite general English coursecurriculum developmentEducationLSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691ENESLatin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, Vol 14, Iss 1 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
ES
topic English for General Purposes
EGP
needs analysis
NA
pre-requisite general English course
curriculum development
Education
L
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
spellingShingle English for General Purposes
EGP
needs analysis
NA
pre-requisite general English course
curriculum development
Education
L
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Bizhan Hekmatshoar Tabari
Ramin Rahimy
Tailored vs. Standard Curriculum and General English Achievement: A Study of Teachers’ Views
description This study was conducted in two phases. The first one is the preliminary phase aimed at tailoring the standard curriculum based on learners’ needs analysis. The second one is the main phase, intended to evaluate the tailored curriculum based on teachers’ views. The participants in the preliminary phase of the study (tailoring the curriculum) were 346 non-native male and female undergraduate students who received the same Pre-Requisite General English course at their first semester in university. They were studying different majors, including Accounting, Architecture, Civil Engineering, Electrical Engineering, and Mechanical Engineering. The participants in the main phase (evaluation of the tailored curriculum by teachers) were 10 non-native male (7) and female (3) teachers who taught the Pre-Requisite General English course through the tailored curriculum. The findings of the study supported the hypothesis that the teachers have a positive attitude toward using the tailored curriculum in teaching the Pre-Requisite General English course. It seems that the implementation of this tailored program, which is based on learner-needs-analysis, can enhance the effectiveness of the English for General Purposes (EGP) course, compared to the standard one.
format article
author Bizhan Hekmatshoar Tabari
Ramin Rahimy
author_facet Bizhan Hekmatshoar Tabari
Ramin Rahimy
author_sort Bizhan Hekmatshoar Tabari
title Tailored vs. Standard Curriculum and General English Achievement: A Study of Teachers’ Views
title_short Tailored vs. Standard Curriculum and General English Achievement: A Study of Teachers’ Views
title_full Tailored vs. Standard Curriculum and General English Achievement: A Study of Teachers’ Views
title_fullStr Tailored vs. Standard Curriculum and General English Achievement: A Study of Teachers’ Views
title_full_unstemmed Tailored vs. Standard Curriculum and General English Achievement: A Study of Teachers’ Views
title_sort tailored vs. standard curriculum and general english achievement: a study of teachers’ views
publisher Universidad de La Sabana
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/d8449701911042d38d54628c6612a289
work_keys_str_mv AT bizhanhekmatshoartabari tailoredvsstandardcurriculumandgeneralenglishachievementastudyofteachersviews
AT raminrahimy tailoredvsstandardcurriculumandgeneralenglishachievementastudyofteachersviews
_version_ 1718407675901902848