Managing cognitive load in simulations: exploring the role of simulation technologists

Background: Facilitating simulation is a complex task with high cognitive load. Simulation technologists are often recruited to help run scenarios and lower some of the extraneous load. We used cognitive load theory to explore the impact of technologists on instructors, identifying sources of instr...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matt Sibbald, Bingxian Wang, Kyla Caners
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Canadian Medical Education Journal 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/dd9ddb927a424525916c3080911ed357
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:dd9ddb927a424525916c3080911ed357
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:dd9ddb927a424525916c3080911ed3572021-12-01T22:41:42ZManaging cognitive load in simulations: exploring the role of simulation technologists10.36834/cmej.680931923-1202https://doaj.org/article/dd9ddb927a424525916c3080911ed3572019-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cmej/article/view/68093https://doaj.org/toc/1923-1202 Background: Facilitating simulation is a complex task with high cognitive load. Simulation technologists are often recruited to help run scenarios and lower some of the extraneous load. We used cognitive load theory to explore the impact of technologists on instructors, identifying sources of instructor cognitive load with and without technologists present. Methods: Data was collected from 56 simulation sessions for postgraduate emergency medicine residents. Instructors delivered 14 of the sessions without a technologist. After each session, the instructor and simulation technologist (if present) provided quantitative and qualitative data on the cognitive load of the simulation. Results: Instructors rated their cognitive load similarly regardless of whether simulation technologists were present. However, the composition of their cognitive load differed. Instructors experienced less cognitive load related to the simulator and technical resources when technologists were present. Qualitative feedback from instructors suggested real consequences to these differences in cognitive load in (1) perceived complexities in running the scenario, and (2) observations of learners. Conclusions: We provide evidence that simulation technologists can remove some of the extraneous load related to the simulator and technical resources for the instructor, allowing the instructor to focus more on observing the learner(s) and tailoring the scenario to their actions. Matt SibbaldBingxian WangKyla CanersCanadian Medical Education JournalarticleEducation (General)L7-991Medicine (General)R5-920ENCanadian Medical Education Journal, Vol 10, Iss 4 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Education (General)
L7-991
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle Education (General)
L7-991
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Matt Sibbald
Bingxian Wang
Kyla Caners
Managing cognitive load in simulations: exploring the role of simulation technologists
description Background: Facilitating simulation is a complex task with high cognitive load. Simulation technologists are often recruited to help run scenarios and lower some of the extraneous load. We used cognitive load theory to explore the impact of technologists on instructors, identifying sources of instructor cognitive load with and without technologists present. Methods: Data was collected from 56 simulation sessions for postgraduate emergency medicine residents. Instructors delivered 14 of the sessions without a technologist. After each session, the instructor and simulation technologist (if present) provided quantitative and qualitative data on the cognitive load of the simulation. Results: Instructors rated their cognitive load similarly regardless of whether simulation technologists were present. However, the composition of their cognitive load differed. Instructors experienced less cognitive load related to the simulator and technical resources when technologists were present. Qualitative feedback from instructors suggested real consequences to these differences in cognitive load in (1) perceived complexities in running the scenario, and (2) observations of learners. Conclusions: We provide evidence that simulation technologists can remove some of the extraneous load related to the simulator and technical resources for the instructor, allowing the instructor to focus more on observing the learner(s) and tailoring the scenario to their actions.
format article
author Matt Sibbald
Bingxian Wang
Kyla Caners
author_facet Matt Sibbald
Bingxian Wang
Kyla Caners
author_sort Matt Sibbald
title Managing cognitive load in simulations: exploring the role of simulation technologists
title_short Managing cognitive load in simulations: exploring the role of simulation technologists
title_full Managing cognitive load in simulations: exploring the role of simulation technologists
title_fullStr Managing cognitive load in simulations: exploring the role of simulation technologists
title_full_unstemmed Managing cognitive load in simulations: exploring the role of simulation technologists
title_sort managing cognitive load in simulations: exploring the role of simulation technologists
publisher Canadian Medical Education Journal
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/dd9ddb927a424525916c3080911ed357
work_keys_str_mv AT mattsibbald managingcognitiveloadinsimulationsexploringtheroleofsimulationtechnologists
AT bingxianwang managingcognitiveloadinsimulationsexploringtheroleofsimulationtechnologists
AT kylacaners managingcognitiveloadinsimulationsexploringtheroleofsimulationtechnologists
_version_ 1718404073641738240