Iterative static modeling of channelized reservoirs using history-matched facies probability data and rejection of training image

Abstract Most inverse reservoir modeling techniques require many forward simulations, and the posterior models cannot preserve geological features of prior models. This study proposes an iterative static modeling approach that utilizes dynamic data for rejecting an unsuitable training image (TI) amo...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kyungbook Lee, Sungil Kim, Jonggeun Choe, Baehyun Min, Hyun Suk Lee
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2018
Materias:
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e5822848121e49acad9a3a9f2630e358
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:Abstract Most inverse reservoir modeling techniques require many forward simulations, and the posterior models cannot preserve geological features of prior models. This study proposes an iterative static modeling approach that utilizes dynamic data for rejecting an unsuitable training image (TI) among a set of TI candidates and for synthesizing history-matched pseudo-soft data. The proposed method is applied to two cases of channelized reservoirs, which have uncertainty in channel geometry such as direction, amplitude, and width. Distance-based clustering is applied to the initial models in total to select the qualified models efficiently. The mean of the qualified models is employed as a history-matched facies probability map in the next iteration of static models. Also, the most plausible TI is determined among TI candidates by rejecting other TIs during the iteration. The posterior models of the proposed method outperform updated models of ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) and ensemble smoother (ES) because they describe the true facies connectivity with bimodal distribution and predict oil and water production with a reasonable range of uncertainty. In terms of simulation time, it requires 30 times of forward simulation in history matching, while the EnKF and ES need 9000 times and 200 times, respectively.