Third-party online organizational reviews: Explaining review-and-rating patterns of the United States military and large corporate organizations

Virtual spaces are a new and influential means by which present and past organizational members share reviews of their organizational experiences and socialize potential newcomers; however, online reviews can be negative and jeopardize an organization’s image. This investigation employed social iden...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: William T. Howe, Jr., Ryan S. Bisel
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e7e3ffac8ec64208a0f0845071548c05
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e7e3ffac8ec64208a0f0845071548c05
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e7e3ffac8ec64208a0f0845071548c052021-12-01T05:03:04ZThird-party online organizational reviews: Explaining review-and-rating patterns of the United States military and large corporate organizations2451-958810.1016/j.chbr.2020.100006https://doaj.org/article/e7e3ffac8ec64208a0f0845071548c052020-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958820300063https://doaj.org/toc/2451-9588Virtual spaces are a new and influential means by which present and past organizational members share reviews of their organizational experiences and socialize potential newcomers; however, online reviews can be negative and jeopardize an organization’s image. This investigation employed social identity theory and uncertainty management theory as a means of explaining patterned user ratings of organizational reviews online. In a first study, we content analyzed socialization storytelling about Basic Training on americangrit.com. Statistical analysis revealed that viewers rated stories more highly when the story portrayed the military favorably. In a second study, a content analysis of organizational reviews posted to indeed.com replicated and extended this pattern: Website visitors rewarded positive reviews of U.S. Military branches with higher ratings, while reviews of large corporate organizations (i.e., Apple, Bank of America, Michelin) varied. Implications for theory and practice conclude the paper.William T. Howe, Jr.Ryan S. BiselElsevierarticleOrganizational socializationSocial identity theoryUncertainty management theoryTotalistic organizationsVirtual spacesMilitaryElectronic computers. Computer scienceQA75.5-76.95PsychologyBF1-990ENComputers in Human Behavior Reports, Vol 1, Iss , Pp 100006- (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Organizational socialization
Social identity theory
Uncertainty management theory
Totalistic organizations
Virtual spaces
Military
Electronic computers. Computer science
QA75.5-76.95
Psychology
BF1-990
spellingShingle Organizational socialization
Social identity theory
Uncertainty management theory
Totalistic organizations
Virtual spaces
Military
Electronic computers. Computer science
QA75.5-76.95
Psychology
BF1-990
William T. Howe, Jr.
Ryan S. Bisel
Third-party online organizational reviews: Explaining review-and-rating patterns of the United States military and large corporate organizations
description Virtual spaces are a new and influential means by which present and past organizational members share reviews of their organizational experiences and socialize potential newcomers; however, online reviews can be negative and jeopardize an organization’s image. This investigation employed social identity theory and uncertainty management theory as a means of explaining patterned user ratings of organizational reviews online. In a first study, we content analyzed socialization storytelling about Basic Training on americangrit.com. Statistical analysis revealed that viewers rated stories more highly when the story portrayed the military favorably. In a second study, a content analysis of organizational reviews posted to indeed.com replicated and extended this pattern: Website visitors rewarded positive reviews of U.S. Military branches with higher ratings, while reviews of large corporate organizations (i.e., Apple, Bank of America, Michelin) varied. Implications for theory and practice conclude the paper.
format article
author William T. Howe, Jr.
Ryan S. Bisel
author_facet William T. Howe, Jr.
Ryan S. Bisel
author_sort William T. Howe, Jr.
title Third-party online organizational reviews: Explaining review-and-rating patterns of the United States military and large corporate organizations
title_short Third-party online organizational reviews: Explaining review-and-rating patterns of the United States military and large corporate organizations
title_full Third-party online organizational reviews: Explaining review-and-rating patterns of the United States military and large corporate organizations
title_fullStr Third-party online organizational reviews: Explaining review-and-rating patterns of the United States military and large corporate organizations
title_full_unstemmed Third-party online organizational reviews: Explaining review-and-rating patterns of the United States military and large corporate organizations
title_sort third-party online organizational reviews: explaining review-and-rating patterns of the united states military and large corporate organizations
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/e7e3ffac8ec64208a0f0845071548c05
work_keys_str_mv AT williamthowejr thirdpartyonlineorganizationalreviewsexplainingreviewandratingpatternsoftheunitedstatesmilitaryandlargecorporateorganizations
AT ryansbisel thirdpartyonlineorganizationalreviewsexplainingreviewandratingpatternsoftheunitedstatesmilitaryandlargecorporateorganizations
_version_ 1718405634851864576