Using the mTSES to Evaluate and Optimize mLearning Professional Development

The impact of targeted professional development activities on teachers’ perceptions of self-efficacy with mobile learning remains understudied. Power (2015a) used the Mobile Teacher’s Sense of Efficacy Scale (mTSES) survey instrument to measure the effects of a mobile learning themed professional d...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robert Leo Power, Dean Cristol, Belinda Gimbert, Robin Bartoletti, Whitney Kilgore
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Athabasca University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ea633ac453db481cb20ae3764ca6b97f
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ea633ac453db481cb20ae3764ca6b97f
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ea633ac453db481cb20ae3764ca6b97f2021-12-02T19:25:57ZUsing the mTSES to Evaluate and Optimize mLearning Professional Development10.19173/irrodl.v17i4.24591492-3831https://doaj.org/article/ea633ac453db481cb20ae3764ca6b97f2016-07-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2459https://doaj.org/toc/1492-3831 The impact of targeted professional development activities on teachers’ perceptions of self-efficacy with mobile learning remains understudied. Power (2015a) used the Mobile Teacher’s Sense of Efficacy Scale (mTSES) survey instrument to measure the effects of a mobile learning themed professional development course on teachers’ confidence with and interest in mobile learning. The current study looks at changes in perceptions of self-efficacy amongst participants in another open course about mobile learning called Instructional Design for Mobile Learning (ID4ML), which took place from May 4 – June 6, 2015 (Power, Bartoletti & Kilgore, 2015). The purpose of this study is to verify the reliability and construct validity of the mTSES instrument developed by Power (2015a, 2015b) and Power, Cristol and Gimbert (2014), and to explore trends in self-efficacy changes amongst a more diversified participant population. This paper reports on the findings from the analysis of data collected using the mTSES tool. The findings provide useful feedback on the impacts of participating in the ID4ML course. They also provide further support for the utility of the mTSES instrument as a measure of perceptions of self-efficacy with mobile learning. These findings point to the potential utility of the mTSES as a tool for both planning and evaluating mLearning professional development training for teachers. Robert Leo PowerDean CristolBelinda GimbertRobin BartolettiWhitney KilgoreAthabasca University PressarticleCSAMmLearningmobile learningmTSESprofessional developmentself-efficacySpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691ENInternational Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Vol 17, Iss 4 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic CSAM
mLearning
mobile learning
mTSES
professional development
self-efficacy
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
spellingShingle CSAM
mLearning
mobile learning
mTSES
professional development
self-efficacy
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Robert Leo Power
Dean Cristol
Belinda Gimbert
Robin Bartoletti
Whitney Kilgore
Using the mTSES to Evaluate and Optimize mLearning Professional Development
description The impact of targeted professional development activities on teachers’ perceptions of self-efficacy with mobile learning remains understudied. Power (2015a) used the Mobile Teacher’s Sense of Efficacy Scale (mTSES) survey instrument to measure the effects of a mobile learning themed professional development course on teachers’ confidence with and interest in mobile learning. The current study looks at changes in perceptions of self-efficacy amongst participants in another open course about mobile learning called Instructional Design for Mobile Learning (ID4ML), which took place from May 4 – June 6, 2015 (Power, Bartoletti & Kilgore, 2015). The purpose of this study is to verify the reliability and construct validity of the mTSES instrument developed by Power (2015a, 2015b) and Power, Cristol and Gimbert (2014), and to explore trends in self-efficacy changes amongst a more diversified participant population. This paper reports on the findings from the analysis of data collected using the mTSES tool. The findings provide useful feedback on the impacts of participating in the ID4ML course. They also provide further support for the utility of the mTSES instrument as a measure of perceptions of self-efficacy with mobile learning. These findings point to the potential utility of the mTSES as a tool for both planning and evaluating mLearning professional development training for teachers.
format article
author Robert Leo Power
Dean Cristol
Belinda Gimbert
Robin Bartoletti
Whitney Kilgore
author_facet Robert Leo Power
Dean Cristol
Belinda Gimbert
Robin Bartoletti
Whitney Kilgore
author_sort Robert Leo Power
title Using the mTSES to Evaluate and Optimize mLearning Professional Development
title_short Using the mTSES to Evaluate and Optimize mLearning Professional Development
title_full Using the mTSES to Evaluate and Optimize mLearning Professional Development
title_fullStr Using the mTSES to Evaluate and Optimize mLearning Professional Development
title_full_unstemmed Using the mTSES to Evaluate and Optimize mLearning Professional Development
title_sort using the mtses to evaluate and optimize mlearning professional development
publisher Athabasca University Press
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/ea633ac453db481cb20ae3764ca6b97f
work_keys_str_mv AT robertleopower usingthemtsestoevaluateandoptimizemlearningprofessionaldevelopment
AT deancristol usingthemtsestoevaluateandoptimizemlearningprofessionaldevelopment
AT belindagimbert usingthemtsestoevaluateandoptimizemlearningprofessionaldevelopment
AT robinbartoletti usingthemtsestoevaluateandoptimizemlearningprofessionaldevelopment
AT whitneykilgore usingthemtsestoevaluateandoptimizemlearningprofessionaldevelopment
_version_ 1718376592198074368