Structural design principles for specific ultra-high affinity interactions between colicins/pyocins and immunity proteins

Abstract The interactions of the antibiotic proteins colicins/pyocins with immunity proteins is a seminal model system for studying protein–protein interactions and specificity. Yet, a precise and quantitative determination of which structural elements and residues determine their binding affinity a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Avital Shushan, Mickey Kosloff
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/eebc68ecefcd47f48e1af52640e17f11
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:eebc68ecefcd47f48e1af52640e17f11
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:eebc68ecefcd47f48e1af52640e17f112021-12-02T14:03:46ZStructural design principles for specific ultra-high affinity interactions between colicins/pyocins and immunity proteins10.1038/s41598-021-83265-22045-2322https://doaj.org/article/eebc68ecefcd47f48e1af52640e17f112021-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83265-2https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The interactions of the antibiotic proteins colicins/pyocins with immunity proteins is a seminal model system for studying protein–protein interactions and specificity. Yet, a precise and quantitative determination of which structural elements and residues determine their binding affinity and specificity is still lacking. Here, we used comparative structure-based energy calculations to map residues that substantially contribute to interactions across native and engineered complexes of colicins/pyocins and immunity proteins. We show that the immunity protein α1–α2 motif is a unique structurally-dissimilar element that restricts interaction specificity towards all colicins/pyocins, in both engineered and native complexes. This motif combines with a diverse and extensive array of electrostatic/polar interactions that enable the exquisite specificity that characterizes these interactions while achieving ultra-high affinity. Surprisingly, the divergence of these contributing colicin residues is reciprocal to residue conservation in immunity proteins. The structurally-dissimilar immunity protein α1–α2 motif is recognized by divergent colicins similarly, while the conserved immunity protein α3 helix interacts with diverse colicin residues. Electrostatics thus plays a key role in setting interaction specificity across all colicins and immunity proteins. Our analysis and resulting residue-level maps illuminate the molecular basis for these protein–protein interactions, with implications for drug development and rational engineering of these interfaces.Avital ShushanMickey KosloffNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-15 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Avital Shushan
Mickey Kosloff
Structural design principles for specific ultra-high affinity interactions between colicins/pyocins and immunity proteins
description Abstract The interactions of the antibiotic proteins colicins/pyocins with immunity proteins is a seminal model system for studying protein–protein interactions and specificity. Yet, a precise and quantitative determination of which structural elements and residues determine their binding affinity and specificity is still lacking. Here, we used comparative structure-based energy calculations to map residues that substantially contribute to interactions across native and engineered complexes of colicins/pyocins and immunity proteins. We show that the immunity protein α1–α2 motif is a unique structurally-dissimilar element that restricts interaction specificity towards all colicins/pyocins, in both engineered and native complexes. This motif combines with a diverse and extensive array of electrostatic/polar interactions that enable the exquisite specificity that characterizes these interactions while achieving ultra-high affinity. Surprisingly, the divergence of these contributing colicin residues is reciprocal to residue conservation in immunity proteins. The structurally-dissimilar immunity protein α1–α2 motif is recognized by divergent colicins similarly, while the conserved immunity protein α3 helix interacts with diverse colicin residues. Electrostatics thus plays a key role in setting interaction specificity across all colicins and immunity proteins. Our analysis and resulting residue-level maps illuminate the molecular basis for these protein–protein interactions, with implications for drug development and rational engineering of these interfaces.
format article
author Avital Shushan
Mickey Kosloff
author_facet Avital Shushan
Mickey Kosloff
author_sort Avital Shushan
title Structural design principles for specific ultra-high affinity interactions between colicins/pyocins and immunity proteins
title_short Structural design principles for specific ultra-high affinity interactions between colicins/pyocins and immunity proteins
title_full Structural design principles for specific ultra-high affinity interactions between colicins/pyocins and immunity proteins
title_fullStr Structural design principles for specific ultra-high affinity interactions between colicins/pyocins and immunity proteins
title_full_unstemmed Structural design principles for specific ultra-high affinity interactions between colicins/pyocins and immunity proteins
title_sort structural design principles for specific ultra-high affinity interactions between colicins/pyocins and immunity proteins
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/eebc68ecefcd47f48e1af52640e17f11
work_keys_str_mv AT avitalshushan structuraldesignprinciplesforspecificultrahighaffinityinteractionsbetweencolicinspyocinsandimmunityproteins
AT mickeykosloff structuraldesignprinciplesforspecificultrahighaffinityinteractionsbetweencolicinspyocinsandimmunityproteins
_version_ 1718392116974977024