Clinical Reasoning in the Ward Setting: A Rapid Response Scenario for Residents and Attendings

Introduction There is a need for educational resources supporting the practice and assessment of the complex processes of clinical reasoning in the inpatient setting along a continuum of physician experience levels. Methods Using participatory design, we created a scenario-based simulation integrati...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Megan Ohmer, Steven J. Durning, Walter Kucera, Matthew Nealeigh, Sarah Ordway, Thomas Mellor, Jeffery Mikita, Anna Howle, Sarah Krajnik, Abigail Konopasky, Divya Ramani, Alexis Battista
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Association of American Medical Colleges 2019
Materias:
L
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f39c4a79e5574c74b8bd6ae97f63ca65
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f39c4a79e5574c74b8bd6ae97f63ca65
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f39c4a79e5574c74b8bd6ae97f63ca652021-11-22T13:57:11ZClinical Reasoning in the Ward Setting: A Rapid Response Scenario for Residents and Attendings10.15766/mep_2374-8265.108342374-8265https://doaj.org/article/f39c4a79e5574c74b8bd6ae97f63ca652019-09-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.mededportal.org/doi/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10834https://doaj.org/toc/2374-8265Introduction There is a need for educational resources supporting the practice and assessment of the complex processes of clinical reasoning in the inpatient setting along a continuum of physician experience levels. Methods Using participatory design, we created a scenario-based simulation integrating diagnostic ambiguity, contextual factors, and rising patient acuity to increase complexity. Resources include an open-ended written exercise and think-aloud reflection protocol to elicit diagnostic and management reasoning and reflection on that reasoning. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the initial implementation evaluation results. Results Twenty physicians from multiple training stages and specialties (interns, residents, attendings, family physicians, internists, surgeons) underwent the simulated scenario. Participants engaged in clinical reasoning processes consistent with the design, considering a total of 19 differential diagnoses. Ten participants provided the correct leading diagnosis, tension pneumothorax, with an additional eight providing pneumothorax and all participants offering relevant supporting evidence. There was also good evidence of management reasoning, with all participants either performing an intervention or calling for assistance and reflecting on management plans in the think-aloud. The scenario was a reasonable approximation of clinical practice, with a mean authenticity rating of 4.15 out of 5. Finally, the scenario presented adequate challenge, with interns and residents rating it as only slightly more challenging (means of 7.83 and 7.17, respectively) than attendings (mean of 6.63 out of 10). Discussion Despite the challenges of scenario complexity, evaluation results indicate that this resource supports the observation and analysis of diagnostic and management reasoning of diverse specialties from interns through attendings.Megan OhmerSteven J. DurningWalter KuceraMatthew NealeighSarah OrdwayThomas MellorJeffery MikitaAnna HowleSarah KrajnikAbigail KonopaskyDivya RamaniAlexis BattistaAssociation of American Medical CollegesarticleClinical ReasoningSimulationStandardized PatientScenario-Based SimulationThink-AloudMedical/Surgical WardMedicine (General)R5-920EducationLENMedEdPORTAL, Vol 15 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Clinical Reasoning
Simulation
Standardized Patient
Scenario-Based Simulation
Think-Aloud
Medical/Surgical Ward
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Education
L
spellingShingle Clinical Reasoning
Simulation
Standardized Patient
Scenario-Based Simulation
Think-Aloud
Medical/Surgical Ward
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Education
L
Megan Ohmer
Steven J. Durning
Walter Kucera
Matthew Nealeigh
Sarah Ordway
Thomas Mellor
Jeffery Mikita
Anna Howle
Sarah Krajnik
Abigail Konopasky
Divya Ramani
Alexis Battista
Clinical Reasoning in the Ward Setting: A Rapid Response Scenario for Residents and Attendings
description Introduction There is a need for educational resources supporting the practice and assessment of the complex processes of clinical reasoning in the inpatient setting along a continuum of physician experience levels. Methods Using participatory design, we created a scenario-based simulation integrating diagnostic ambiguity, contextual factors, and rising patient acuity to increase complexity. Resources include an open-ended written exercise and think-aloud reflection protocol to elicit diagnostic and management reasoning and reflection on that reasoning. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the initial implementation evaluation results. Results Twenty physicians from multiple training stages and specialties (interns, residents, attendings, family physicians, internists, surgeons) underwent the simulated scenario. Participants engaged in clinical reasoning processes consistent with the design, considering a total of 19 differential diagnoses. Ten participants provided the correct leading diagnosis, tension pneumothorax, with an additional eight providing pneumothorax and all participants offering relevant supporting evidence. There was also good evidence of management reasoning, with all participants either performing an intervention or calling for assistance and reflecting on management plans in the think-aloud. The scenario was a reasonable approximation of clinical practice, with a mean authenticity rating of 4.15 out of 5. Finally, the scenario presented adequate challenge, with interns and residents rating it as only slightly more challenging (means of 7.83 and 7.17, respectively) than attendings (mean of 6.63 out of 10). Discussion Despite the challenges of scenario complexity, evaluation results indicate that this resource supports the observation and analysis of diagnostic and management reasoning of diverse specialties from interns through attendings.
format article
author Megan Ohmer
Steven J. Durning
Walter Kucera
Matthew Nealeigh
Sarah Ordway
Thomas Mellor
Jeffery Mikita
Anna Howle
Sarah Krajnik
Abigail Konopasky
Divya Ramani
Alexis Battista
author_facet Megan Ohmer
Steven J. Durning
Walter Kucera
Matthew Nealeigh
Sarah Ordway
Thomas Mellor
Jeffery Mikita
Anna Howle
Sarah Krajnik
Abigail Konopasky
Divya Ramani
Alexis Battista
author_sort Megan Ohmer
title Clinical Reasoning in the Ward Setting: A Rapid Response Scenario for Residents and Attendings
title_short Clinical Reasoning in the Ward Setting: A Rapid Response Scenario for Residents and Attendings
title_full Clinical Reasoning in the Ward Setting: A Rapid Response Scenario for Residents and Attendings
title_fullStr Clinical Reasoning in the Ward Setting: A Rapid Response Scenario for Residents and Attendings
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Reasoning in the Ward Setting: A Rapid Response Scenario for Residents and Attendings
title_sort clinical reasoning in the ward setting: a rapid response scenario for residents and attendings
publisher Association of American Medical Colleges
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/f39c4a79e5574c74b8bd6ae97f63ca65
work_keys_str_mv AT meganohmer clinicalreasoninginthewardsettingarapidresponsescenarioforresidentsandattendings
AT stevenjdurning clinicalreasoninginthewardsettingarapidresponsescenarioforresidentsandattendings
AT walterkucera clinicalreasoninginthewardsettingarapidresponsescenarioforresidentsandattendings
AT matthewnealeigh clinicalreasoninginthewardsettingarapidresponsescenarioforresidentsandattendings
AT sarahordway clinicalreasoninginthewardsettingarapidresponsescenarioforresidentsandattendings
AT thomasmellor clinicalreasoninginthewardsettingarapidresponsescenarioforresidentsandattendings
AT jefferymikita clinicalreasoninginthewardsettingarapidresponsescenarioforresidentsandattendings
AT annahowle clinicalreasoninginthewardsettingarapidresponsescenarioforresidentsandattendings
AT sarahkrajnik clinicalreasoninginthewardsettingarapidresponsescenarioforresidentsandattendings
AT abigailkonopasky clinicalreasoninginthewardsettingarapidresponsescenarioforresidentsandattendings
AT divyaramani clinicalreasoninginthewardsettingarapidresponsescenarioforresidentsandattendings
AT alexisbattista clinicalreasoninginthewardsettingarapidresponsescenarioforresidentsandattendings
_version_ 1718417590604267520