Comparison of 3Â mm versus 4Â mm rigid endoscope in diagnostic nasal endoscopy
Objective: Compare nasal endoscopy with 3 mm versus conventional 4 mm rigid 30° endoscopes for visualization, patient comfort, and examiner ease. Methods: Ten adults with no previous sinus surgery underwent bilateral nasal endoscopy with both 4 mm and 3 mm endoscopes (resulting in 20 paired nas...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Gregory S. Neel, Ryan L. Kau, Stephen F. Bansberg, Devyani Lal |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Language: | EN |
Published: |
KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doaj.org/article/f6a7fe1602d04c2fa088feb41a0ae0af |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Nasal endoscopy protocols in the era of COVID-19
by: Jacob Fried, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Application of drug-induced sleep endoscopy in patients treated with upper airway stimulation therapy
by: Adrian A. Ong, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Chronic rhinosinusitis and endoscopic sinus surgery
by: Opeyemi O. Daramola, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Evaluation of sheep sinonasal endoscopic anatomy as a model for rhinologic research
by: Luis Macias-Valle, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Thirty years of endoscopic sinus surgery: What have we learned?
by: Bobby A. Tajudeen, et al.
Published: (2017)