Poor reliability between Cochrane reviewers and blinded external reviewers when applying the Cochrane risk of bias tool in physical therapy trials.
<h4>Objectives</h4>To test the inter-rater reliability of the RoB tool applied to Physical Therapy (PT) trials by comparing ratings from Cochrane review authors with those of blinded external reviewers.<h4>Methods</h4>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PT were identified...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Susan Armijo-Olivo, Maria Ospina, Bruno R da Costa, Matthias Egger, Humam Saltaji, Jorge Fuentes, Christine Ha, Greta G Cummings |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/fa1f1f0f37a84164b582adf27aae84d8 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Statistical multiplicity in systematic reviews of anaesthesia interventions: a quantification and comparison between Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews.
por: Georgina Imberger, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Reporting of methods to prepare, pilot and perform data extraction in systematic reviews: analysis of a sample of 152 Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews
por: Roland Brian Büchter, et al.
Publicado: (2021) - Lord Thomas Cochrane
-
Cochrane systematic reviews of Chinese herbal medicines: an overview.
por: Jing Hu, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Archibald Cochrane (1909-1988)
Publicado: (2007)