Poor reliability between Cochrane reviewers and blinded external reviewers when applying the Cochrane risk of bias tool in physical therapy trials.
<h4>Objectives</h4>To test the inter-rater reliability of the RoB tool applied to Physical Therapy (PT) trials by comparing ratings from Cochrane review authors with those of blinded external reviewers.<h4>Methods</h4>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PT were identified...
Enregistré dans:
Auteurs principaux: | Susan Armijo-Olivo, Maria Ospina, Bruno R da Costa, Matthias Egger, Humam Saltaji, Jorge Fuentes, Christine Ha, Greta G Cummings |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Langue: | EN |
Publié: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014
|
Sujets: | |
Accès en ligne: | https://doaj.org/article/fa1f1f0f37a84164b582adf27aae84d8 |
Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
Documents similaires
-
Statistical multiplicity in systematic reviews of anaesthesia interventions: a quantification and comparison between Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews.
par: Georgina Imberger, et autres
Publié: (2011) -
Reporting of methods to prepare, pilot and perform data extraction in systematic reviews: analysis of a sample of 152 Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews
par: Roland Brian Büchter, et autres
Publié: (2021) - Lord Thomas Cochrane
-
Cochrane systematic reviews of Chinese herbal medicines: an overview.
par: Jing Hu, et autres
Publié: (2011) -
Archibald Cochrane (1909-1988)
Publié: (2007)