THE COMPARISON OF THE INFORMATION LITERACY SELF EFFICACY OF PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS IN TERMS OF SOME VARIABLES

In this study, it is aimed that teachers information literacy self-efficacy is compared to some variables. For this reason descriptive survey model is preferred in this study. Data collection tool of this study is information literacy self-efficacy scale. This scale is implemented on 783 prospective...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murat TUNCER, Kürşat BALCI
Formato: article
Lenguaje:DE
EN
FR
TR
Publicado: Fırat University 2019
Materias:
H
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fcb949074fd14078b54701349b5d2ad4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:fcb949074fd14078b54701349b5d2ad4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:fcb949074fd14078b54701349b5d2ad42021-11-24T09:21:03ZTHE COMPARISON OF THE INFORMATION LITERACY SELF EFFICACY OF PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS IN TERMS OF SOME VARIABLES2148-416310.9761/JASSS1385https://doaj.org/article/fcb949074fd14078b54701349b5d2ad42019-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jasstudies.com/index.jsp?mod=tammetin&makaleadi=107705358_40TuncerMurat-vd_S-719-737.pdf&key=26766https://doaj.org/toc/2148-4163In this study, it is aimed that teachers information literacy self-efficacy is compared to some variables. For this reason descriptive survey model is preferred in this study. Data collection tool of this study is information literacy self-efficacy scale. This scale is implemented on 783 prospective teachers from various departments of The Faculty of Education in Fırat University. In this way data collection is successfully completed. The findings of the independent groups were compared by t test and one way analysis of variance, but when homogeneity requirement cannot be maintained, it was applied Mann Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis H test. One of the findings in this study is that taking the information literacy course in research methods class and self-efficacy variables make no difference. Furthermore, in the library literacy self-efficacy sub-dimension of the information literacy self-efficacy scale, significant difference has been observed compared to the most preferred information getting variable. When Responses to the items of the scale compared in terms of the variable section it was observed significant difference in general of the scale and all the sub-factors of the scale. Increasing in the quantity and quality of information quality, the importance of having lifelong learning skills has revealed the need of developing such as information literacy skills. It has to be determined prospective teachers’ information literacy efficacy on which level before they work and it has to be tried to eliminate the observed defects. It needs to be created a difference among lifelong learning skills of information literacy self-efficacy.Murat TUNCERKürşat BALCIFırat Universityarticleinformation literacy, selfefficacy, teacher training, information communitySocial SciencesHSocial sciences (General)H1-99DEENFRTRJournal of Academic Social Science Studies , Vol 6, Iss 20, Pp 719-737 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language DE
EN
FR
TR
topic information literacy, self
efficacy, teacher training, information community
Social Sciences
H
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
spellingShingle information literacy, self
efficacy, teacher training, information community
Social Sciences
H
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
Murat TUNCER
Kürşat BALCI
THE COMPARISON OF THE INFORMATION LITERACY SELF EFFICACY OF PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS IN TERMS OF SOME VARIABLES
description In this study, it is aimed that teachers information literacy self-efficacy is compared to some variables. For this reason descriptive survey model is preferred in this study. Data collection tool of this study is information literacy self-efficacy scale. This scale is implemented on 783 prospective teachers from various departments of The Faculty of Education in Fırat University. In this way data collection is successfully completed. The findings of the independent groups were compared by t test and one way analysis of variance, but when homogeneity requirement cannot be maintained, it was applied Mann Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis H test. One of the findings in this study is that taking the information literacy course in research methods class and self-efficacy variables make no difference. Furthermore, in the library literacy self-efficacy sub-dimension of the information literacy self-efficacy scale, significant difference has been observed compared to the most preferred information getting variable. When Responses to the items of the scale compared in terms of the variable section it was observed significant difference in general of the scale and all the sub-factors of the scale. Increasing in the quantity and quality of information quality, the importance of having lifelong learning skills has revealed the need of developing such as information literacy skills. It has to be determined prospective teachers’ information literacy efficacy on which level before they work and it has to be tried to eliminate the observed defects. It needs to be created a difference among lifelong learning skills of information literacy self-efficacy.
format article
author Murat TUNCER
Kürşat BALCI
author_facet Murat TUNCER
Kürşat BALCI
author_sort Murat TUNCER
title THE COMPARISON OF THE INFORMATION LITERACY SELF EFFICACY OF PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS IN TERMS OF SOME VARIABLES
title_short THE COMPARISON OF THE INFORMATION LITERACY SELF EFFICACY OF PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS IN TERMS OF SOME VARIABLES
title_full THE COMPARISON OF THE INFORMATION LITERACY SELF EFFICACY OF PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS IN TERMS OF SOME VARIABLES
title_fullStr THE COMPARISON OF THE INFORMATION LITERACY SELF EFFICACY OF PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS IN TERMS OF SOME VARIABLES
title_full_unstemmed THE COMPARISON OF THE INFORMATION LITERACY SELF EFFICACY OF PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS IN TERMS OF SOME VARIABLES
title_sort comparison of the information literacy self efficacy of prospective teachers in terms of some variables
publisher Fırat University
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/fcb949074fd14078b54701349b5d2ad4
work_keys_str_mv AT murattuncer thecomparisonoftheinformationliteracyselfefficacyofprospectiveteachersintermsofsomevariables
AT kursatbalci thecomparisonoftheinformationliteracyselfefficacyofprospectiveteachersintermsofsomevariables
AT murattuncer comparisonoftheinformationliteracyselfefficacyofprospectiveteachersintermsofsomevariables
AT kursatbalci comparisonoftheinformationliteracyselfefficacyofprospectiveteachersintermsofsomevariables
_version_ 1718415270439026688