Evaluación de docentes clínicos de Postgrado: desarrollo y propiedades psicométricas del instrumento MEDUC-PG14

Background: Feedback is one of the most important tools to improve teaching in medical education. Aim: To develop an instrument to assess the performance of clinical postgraduate teachers in medical specialties. Material and Methods: A qualitative methodology consisting in interviews and focus-group...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pizarro,Margarita, Solís,Nancy, Rojas,Viviana, Díaz,Luis Antonio, Padilla,Oslando, Letelier,Luz María, Aizman,Andrés, Sarfatis,Alberto, Olivos,Trinidad, Soza,Alejandro, Delfino,Alejandro, Latorre,Gonzalo, Ivanovic-Zuvic,Danisa, Hoyl,Trinidad, Bitran,Marcela, Arab,Juan Pablo, Riquelme,Arnoldo
Lenguaje:Spanish / Castilian
Publicado: Sociedad Médica de Santiago 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872015000800007
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:scielo:S0034-98872015000800007
record_format dspace
spelling oai:scielo:S0034-988720150008000072015-10-01Evaluación de docentes clínicos de Postgrado: desarrollo y propiedades psicométricas del instrumento MEDUC-PG14Pizarro,MargaritaSolís,NancyRojas,VivianaDíaz,Luis AntonioPadilla,OslandoLetelier,Luz MaríaAizman,AndrésSarfatis,AlbertoOlivos,TrinidadSoza,AlejandroDelfino,AlejandroLatorre,GonzaloIvanovic-Zuvic,DanisaHoyl,TrinidadBitran,MarcelaArab,Juan PabloRiquelme,Arnoldo Educational measurement Questionnaires Specialties, medical Background: Feedback is one of the most important tools to improve teaching in medical education. Aim: To develop an instrument to assess the performance of clinical postgraduate teachers in medical specialties. Material and Methods: A qualitative methodology consisting in interviews and focus-groups followed by a quantitative methodology to generate consensus, was employed. After generating the instrument, psychometric tests were performed to assess the construct validity (factor analysis) and reliability (Cronbach’s alpha). Results: Experts in medical education, teachers and residents of a medical school participated in interviews and focus groups. With this information, 26 categories (79 items) were proposed and reduced to 14 items (Likert scale 1-5) by an expert’s Delphi panel, generating the MEDUC-PG14 survey, which was answered by 123 residents from different programs of medical specialties. Construct validity was carried out. Factor analysis showed three domains: Teaching and evaluation, respectful behavior towards patients and health care team, and providing feedback. The global score was 4.46 ± 0.94 (89% of the maximum). One teachers’ strength, as evaluated by their residents was “respectful behavior” with 4.85 ± 0.42 (97% of the maximum). “Providing feedback” obtained 4.09 ± 1.0 points (81.8% of the maximum). MEDUC-PG14 survey had a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.947. Conclusions: MEDUC-PG14 survey is a useful and reliable guide for teacher evaluation in medical specialty programs. Also provides feedback to improve educational skills of postgraduate clinical teachers.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad Médica de SantiagoRevista médica de Chile v.143 n.8 20152015-08-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872015000800007es10.4067/S0034-98872015000800007
institution Scielo Chile
collection Scielo Chile
language Spanish / Castilian
topic Educational measurement
Questionnaires
Specialties, medical
spellingShingle Educational measurement
Questionnaires
Specialties, medical
Pizarro,Margarita
Solís,Nancy
Rojas,Viviana
Díaz,Luis Antonio
Padilla,Oslando
Letelier,Luz María
Aizman,Andrés
Sarfatis,Alberto
Olivos,Trinidad
Soza,Alejandro
Delfino,Alejandro
Latorre,Gonzalo
Ivanovic-Zuvic,Danisa
Hoyl,Trinidad
Bitran,Marcela
Arab,Juan Pablo
Riquelme,Arnoldo
Evaluación de docentes clínicos de Postgrado: desarrollo y propiedades psicométricas del instrumento MEDUC-PG14
description Background: Feedback is one of the most important tools to improve teaching in medical education. Aim: To develop an instrument to assess the performance of clinical postgraduate teachers in medical specialties. Material and Methods: A qualitative methodology consisting in interviews and focus-groups followed by a quantitative methodology to generate consensus, was employed. After generating the instrument, psychometric tests were performed to assess the construct validity (factor analysis) and reliability (Cronbach’s alpha). Results: Experts in medical education, teachers and residents of a medical school participated in interviews and focus groups. With this information, 26 categories (79 items) were proposed and reduced to 14 items (Likert scale 1-5) by an expert’s Delphi panel, generating the MEDUC-PG14 survey, which was answered by 123 residents from different programs of medical specialties. Construct validity was carried out. Factor analysis showed three domains: Teaching and evaluation, respectful behavior towards patients and health care team, and providing feedback. The global score was 4.46 ± 0.94 (89% of the maximum). One teachers’ strength, as evaluated by their residents was “respectful behavior” with 4.85 ± 0.42 (97% of the maximum). “Providing feedback” obtained 4.09 ± 1.0 points (81.8% of the maximum). MEDUC-PG14 survey had a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.947. Conclusions: MEDUC-PG14 survey is a useful and reliable guide for teacher evaluation in medical specialty programs. Also provides feedback to improve educational skills of postgraduate clinical teachers.
author Pizarro,Margarita
Solís,Nancy
Rojas,Viviana
Díaz,Luis Antonio
Padilla,Oslando
Letelier,Luz María
Aizman,Andrés
Sarfatis,Alberto
Olivos,Trinidad
Soza,Alejandro
Delfino,Alejandro
Latorre,Gonzalo
Ivanovic-Zuvic,Danisa
Hoyl,Trinidad
Bitran,Marcela
Arab,Juan Pablo
Riquelme,Arnoldo
author_facet Pizarro,Margarita
Solís,Nancy
Rojas,Viviana
Díaz,Luis Antonio
Padilla,Oslando
Letelier,Luz María
Aizman,Andrés
Sarfatis,Alberto
Olivos,Trinidad
Soza,Alejandro
Delfino,Alejandro
Latorre,Gonzalo
Ivanovic-Zuvic,Danisa
Hoyl,Trinidad
Bitran,Marcela
Arab,Juan Pablo
Riquelme,Arnoldo
author_sort Pizarro,Margarita
title Evaluación de docentes clínicos de Postgrado: desarrollo y propiedades psicométricas del instrumento MEDUC-PG14
title_short Evaluación de docentes clínicos de Postgrado: desarrollo y propiedades psicométricas del instrumento MEDUC-PG14
title_full Evaluación de docentes clínicos de Postgrado: desarrollo y propiedades psicométricas del instrumento MEDUC-PG14
title_fullStr Evaluación de docentes clínicos de Postgrado: desarrollo y propiedades psicométricas del instrumento MEDUC-PG14
title_full_unstemmed Evaluación de docentes clínicos de Postgrado: desarrollo y propiedades psicométricas del instrumento MEDUC-PG14
title_sort evaluación de docentes clínicos de postgrado: desarrollo y propiedades psicométricas del instrumento meduc-pg14
publisher Sociedad Médica de Santiago
publishDate 2015
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872015000800007
work_keys_str_mv AT pizarromargarita evaluaciondedocentesclinicosdepostgradodesarrolloypropiedadespsicometricasdelinstrumentomeducpg14
AT solisnancy evaluaciondedocentesclinicosdepostgradodesarrolloypropiedadespsicometricasdelinstrumentomeducpg14
AT rojasviviana evaluaciondedocentesclinicosdepostgradodesarrolloypropiedadespsicometricasdelinstrumentomeducpg14
AT diazluisantonio evaluaciondedocentesclinicosdepostgradodesarrolloypropiedadespsicometricasdelinstrumentomeducpg14
AT padillaoslando evaluaciondedocentesclinicosdepostgradodesarrolloypropiedadespsicometricasdelinstrumentomeducpg14
AT letelierluzmaria evaluaciondedocentesclinicosdepostgradodesarrolloypropiedadespsicometricasdelinstrumentomeducpg14
AT aizmanandres evaluaciondedocentesclinicosdepostgradodesarrolloypropiedadespsicometricasdelinstrumentomeducpg14
AT sarfatisalberto evaluaciondedocentesclinicosdepostgradodesarrolloypropiedadespsicometricasdelinstrumentomeducpg14
AT olivostrinidad evaluaciondedocentesclinicosdepostgradodesarrolloypropiedadespsicometricasdelinstrumentomeducpg14
AT sozaalejandro evaluaciondedocentesclinicosdepostgradodesarrolloypropiedadespsicometricasdelinstrumentomeducpg14
AT delfinoalejandro evaluaciondedocentesclinicosdepostgradodesarrolloypropiedadespsicometricasdelinstrumentomeducpg14
AT latorregonzalo evaluaciondedocentesclinicosdepostgradodesarrolloypropiedadespsicometricasdelinstrumentomeducpg14
AT ivanoviczuvicdanisa evaluaciondedocentesclinicosdepostgradodesarrolloypropiedadespsicometricasdelinstrumentomeducpg14
AT hoyltrinidad evaluaciondedocentesclinicosdepostgradodesarrolloypropiedadespsicometricasdelinstrumentomeducpg14
AT bitranmarcela evaluaciondedocentesclinicosdepostgradodesarrolloypropiedadespsicometricasdelinstrumentomeducpg14
AT arabjuanpablo evaluaciondedocentesclinicosdepostgradodesarrolloypropiedadespsicometricasdelinstrumentomeducpg14
AT riquelmearnoldo evaluaciondedocentesclinicosdepostgradodesarrolloypropiedadespsicometricasdelinstrumentomeducpg14
_version_ 1718436836514201600