Evaluation of Performance and Perception of Learning in Teaching Human Anatomy: Traditional Method vs Constructivist Method

SUMMARY: The aim of the present study was to analyze the performance and perception of learning in relation to the Traditional Method (TM) and Constructivist Method (CM) in the teaching of Human Anatomy. The sample consisted of 76 students of the Physical Education course of the State University of...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Vitorino,Roger W. S, Fornaziero,Célia Cristina, Vignoto Fernandes,Eduardo
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Sociedad Chilena de Anatomía 2020
Materias:	Active learning Passive learning Lecture Teaching practices
Acceso en línea:	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-95022020000100074
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:scielo:S0717-95022020000100074
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:scielo:S0717-950220200001000742019-11-22Evaluation of Performance and Perception of Learning in Teaching Human Anatomy: Traditional Method vs Constructivist MethodVitorino,Roger W. SFornaziero,Célia CristinaVignoto Fernandes,Eduardo Active learning Passive learning Lecture Teaching practices SUMMARY: The aim of the present study was to analyze the performance and perception of learning in relation to the Traditional Method (TM) and Constructivist Method (CM) in the teaching of Human Anatomy. The sample consisted of 76 students of the Physical Education course of the State University of Londrina, randomly distributed into two groups: TM and CM. The TM group received theoretical-expository and practical classes. The CM group was taken to the laboratory for practical classes and the participants of this class were allocated in up to seven per work table. Didactic materials and cadaveric parts were made available for consultation. After both intervention methods, the groups performed an evaluation on the studied content. The following week, a crossover was performed between the groups and, after the intervention, all participants were again evaluated. Before being given the outcome of their evaluations, participants were asked to answer questions about their perception of learning in relation to the above-mentioned methods. After the analysis, it was verified that the TM group obtained better results in the tests when compared to the CM group. In addition, according to students' perceptions, TM also favored learning more than CM. Therefore, it was evidenced in the present study that the traditional method was more favorable both for the quantitative performance and learning perception of the participants.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad Chilena de AnatomíaInternational Journal of Morphology v.38 n.1 20202020-02-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-95022020000100074en10.4067/S0717-95022020000100074
institution	Scielo Chile
collection	Scielo Chile
language	English
topic	Active learning Passive learning Lecture Teaching practices
spellingShingle	Active learning Passive learning Lecture Teaching practices Vitorino,Roger W. S Fornaziero,Célia Cristina Vignoto Fernandes,Eduardo Evaluation of Performance and Perception of Learning in Teaching Human Anatomy: Traditional Method vs Constructivist Method
description	SUMMARY: The aim of the present study was to analyze the performance and perception of learning in relation to the Traditional Method (TM) and Constructivist Method (CM) in the teaching of Human Anatomy. The sample consisted of 76 students of the Physical Education course of the State University of Londrina, randomly distributed into two groups: TM and CM. The TM group received theoretical-expository and practical classes. The CM group was taken to the laboratory for practical classes and the participants of this class were allocated in up to seven per work table. Didactic materials and cadaveric parts were made available for consultation. After both intervention methods, the groups performed an evaluation on the studied content. The following week, a crossover was performed between the groups and, after the intervention, all participants were again evaluated. Before being given the outcome of their evaluations, participants were asked to answer questions about their perception of learning in relation to the above-mentioned methods. After the analysis, it was verified that the TM group obtained better results in the tests when compared to the CM group. In addition, according to students' perceptions, TM also favored learning more than CM. Therefore, it was evidenced in the present study that the traditional method was more favorable both for the quantitative performance and learning perception of the participants.
author	Vitorino,Roger W. S Fornaziero,Célia Cristina Vignoto Fernandes,Eduardo
author_facet	Vitorino,Roger W. S Fornaziero,Célia Cristina Vignoto Fernandes,Eduardo
author_sort	Vitorino,Roger W. S
title	Evaluation of Performance and Perception of Learning in Teaching Human Anatomy: Traditional Method vs Constructivist Method
title_short	Evaluation of Performance and Perception of Learning in Teaching Human Anatomy: Traditional Method vs Constructivist Method
title_full	Evaluation of Performance and Perception of Learning in Teaching Human Anatomy: Traditional Method vs Constructivist Method
title_fullStr	Evaluation of Performance and Perception of Learning in Teaching Human Anatomy: Traditional Method vs Constructivist Method
title_full_unstemmed	Evaluation of Performance and Perception of Learning in Teaching Human Anatomy: Traditional Method vs Constructivist Method
title_sort	evaluation of performance and perception of learning in teaching human anatomy: traditional method vs constructivist method
publisher	Sociedad Chilena de Anatomía
publishDate	2020
url	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-95022020000100074
work_keys_str_mv	AT vitorinorogerws evaluationofperformanceandperceptionoflearninginteachinghumananatomytraditionalmethodvsconstructivistmethod AT fornazieroceliacristina evaluationofperformanceandperceptionoflearninginteachinghumananatomytraditionalmethodvsconstructivistmethod AT vignotofernandeseduardo evaluationofperformanceandperceptionoflearninginteachinghumananatomytraditionalmethodvsconstructivistmethod
_version_	1718445129842294784

Evaluation of Performance and Perception of Learning in Teaching Human Anatomy: Traditional Method vs Constructivist Method

Ejemplares similares