Accelerating Causal Inference and Feature Selection Methods through G-Test Computation Reuse
This article presents a novel and remarkably efficient method of computing the statistical G-test made possible by exploiting a connection with the fundamental elements of information theory: by writing the <i>G</i> statistic as a sum of joint entropy terms, its computation is decomposed...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/2a57924c93f741e0b2061a803f960863 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | This article presents a novel and remarkably efficient method of computing the statistical G-test made possible by exploiting a connection with the fundamental elements of information theory: by writing the <i>G</i> statistic as a sum of joint entropy terms, its computation is decomposed into easily reusable partial results with no change in the resulting value. This method greatly improves the efficiency of applications that perform a series of G-tests on permutations of the same features, such as feature selection and causal inference applications because this decomposition allows for an intensive reuse of these partial results. The efficiency of this method is demonstrated by implementing it as part of an experiment involving IPC–MB, an efficient Markov blanket discovery algorithm, applicable both as a feature selection algorithm and as a causal inference method. The results show outstanding efficiency gains for IPC–MB when the G-test is computed with the proposed method, compared to the unoptimized G-test, but also when compared to IPC–MB++, a variant of IPC–MB which is enhanced with an AD–tree, both static and dynamic. Even if this proposed method of computing the G-test is presented here in the context of IPC–MB, it is in fact bound neither to IPC–MB in particular, nor to feature selection or causal inference applications in general, because this method targets the information-theoretic concept that underlies the G-test, namely conditional mutual information. This aspect grants it wide applicability in data sciences. |
|---|