Roles of course facilitators, learners, and technology in the flow of information of a cMOOC

Distributed Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are based on the premise that online learning occurs through a network of interconnected learners. The teachers’ role in distributed courses extends to forming such a network by facilitating communication that connects learners and their separate pers...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oleksandra Skrypnyk, Srećko Joksimović, Vitomir Kovanović, Dragan Gašević, Shane Dawson
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Athabasca University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6b9b1c059a5a49a19df03639730b4b02
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6b9b1c059a5a49a19df03639730b4b02
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6b9b1c059a5a49a19df03639730b4b022021-12-02T19:20:40ZRoles of course facilitators, learners, and technology in the flow of information of a cMOOC10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.21701492-3831https://doaj.org/article/6b9b1c059a5a49a19df03639730b4b022015-06-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2170https://doaj.org/toc/1492-3831 Distributed Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are based on the premise that online learning occurs through a network of interconnected learners. The teachers’ role in distributed courses extends to forming such a network by facilitating communication that connects learners and their separate personal learning environments scattered around the Internet. The study reported in this paper examined who fulfilled such an influential role in a particular distributed MOOC – a connectivist course (cMOOC) offered in 2011. Social network analysis was conducted over a socio-technical network of the Twitter-based course interactions, comprising both human course participants and hashtags; where the latter represented technological affordances for scaling course communication. The results of the week-by-week analysis of the network of interactions suggest that the teaching function becomes distributed among influential actors in the network. As the course progressed, both human and technological actors comprising the network subsumed the teaching functions, and exerted influence over the network formation. Regardless, the official course facilitators preserved a high level of influence over the flow of information in the investigated cMOOC. Oleksandra SkrypnykSrećko JoksimovićVitomir KovanovićDragan GaševićShane DawsonAthabasca University Pressarticleteachingsocio-technical networkssocial network analysisMOOCsSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691ENInternational Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Vol 16, Iss 3 (2015)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic teaching
socio-technical networks
social network analysis
MOOCs
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
spellingShingle teaching
socio-technical networks
social network analysis
MOOCs
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Oleksandra Skrypnyk
Srećko Joksimović
Vitomir Kovanović
Dragan Gašević
Shane Dawson
Roles of course facilitators, learners, and technology in the flow of information of a cMOOC
description Distributed Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are based on the premise that online learning occurs through a network of interconnected learners. The teachers’ role in distributed courses extends to forming such a network by facilitating communication that connects learners and their separate personal learning environments scattered around the Internet. The study reported in this paper examined who fulfilled such an influential role in a particular distributed MOOC – a connectivist course (cMOOC) offered in 2011. Social network analysis was conducted over a socio-technical network of the Twitter-based course interactions, comprising both human course participants and hashtags; where the latter represented technological affordances for scaling course communication. The results of the week-by-week analysis of the network of interactions suggest that the teaching function becomes distributed among influential actors in the network. As the course progressed, both human and technological actors comprising the network subsumed the teaching functions, and exerted influence over the network formation. Regardless, the official course facilitators preserved a high level of influence over the flow of information in the investigated cMOOC.
format article
author Oleksandra Skrypnyk
Srećko Joksimović
Vitomir Kovanović
Dragan Gašević
Shane Dawson
author_facet Oleksandra Skrypnyk
Srećko Joksimović
Vitomir Kovanović
Dragan Gašević
Shane Dawson
author_sort Oleksandra Skrypnyk
title Roles of course facilitators, learners, and technology in the flow of information of a cMOOC
title_short Roles of course facilitators, learners, and technology in the flow of information of a cMOOC
title_full Roles of course facilitators, learners, and technology in the flow of information of a cMOOC
title_fullStr Roles of course facilitators, learners, and technology in the flow of information of a cMOOC
title_full_unstemmed Roles of course facilitators, learners, and technology in the flow of information of a cMOOC
title_sort roles of course facilitators, learners, and technology in the flow of information of a cmooc
publisher Athabasca University Press
publishDate 2015
url https://doaj.org/article/6b9b1c059a5a49a19df03639730b4b02
work_keys_str_mv AT oleksandraskrypnyk rolesofcoursefacilitatorslearnersandtechnologyintheflowofinformationofacmooc
AT sreckojoksimovic rolesofcoursefacilitatorslearnersandtechnologyintheflowofinformationofacmooc
AT vitomirkovanovic rolesofcoursefacilitatorslearnersandtechnologyintheflowofinformationofacmooc
AT dragangasevic rolesofcoursefacilitatorslearnersandtechnologyintheflowofinformationofacmooc
AT shanedawson rolesofcoursefacilitatorslearnersandtechnologyintheflowofinformationofacmooc
_version_ 1718376798485479424