Schelling, Cavell, and the Truth of Skepticism
This paper argues that (1) McDowell wrongly assumes that “terror”, Cavell’s reaction to the radical contingency of our shared modes of knowing or our “attunement”, expresses a skepticism that is antinomically bound to an equally unacceptable dogmatism because (2) Cavell rather regards terror as a m...
Saved in:
Main Author: | G. Anthony Bruno |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Language: | EN |
Published: |
MULPress
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doaj.org/article/7c57a7268fc64c21bd7c6e7fe3569452 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Cavell’s Method
by: Sandra Laugier
Published: (2021) -
Cavell and Philosophical Vertigo
by: Duncan Pritchard
Published: (2021) -
Cavell and the "History of the Rejection of the Human"
by: Edward Guetti
Published: (2021) -
Cavell and the Quest for a Voice
by: Sofia Miguens
Published: (2021) -
Stanley Cavell on What We Say
by: Arata Hamawaki
Published: (2021)